Man of the match - who would you have given it to?

In my point of view, man of the match should be given to the player who had the biggest impact on the match. Ofcourse, players of the winning team usually have a bigger impact but it shouldnt be the basis of differentiaqtion as u cant give man of the match award to a player from losing side,, If u see the performances, which have a bigger impact on the last game between AUS and SL are: Dilshan: 60 runs, some hard-hitting in the final overs, enable Srilanka to reach a modest total of 221 Nathan Braken: 4 wickets and just consuming 29 runs in 10 overs, surely put breaks to Srilankan innings Adam Gilchrist: rapid firing 83 of 50 balls, thrashing SL bowlers all around int he frist 15 overs and match was evntually one sided Amarasinghe: His second spell did the trick along with other SL bowlers, two crucial wickets of Micheal Clarke and Andrew Symonds, both for duck, in the middle overs. Total 3 wickets in the match I personally feel, Both Adam Gilchrist and Amarasinghe deserve the match. Adam Gilchrist took the game away from Srilankans and Amarasinghe by takng wickets if Symonds and Clarke brought Srilanka back..

i think some one in SL should have got it!! there was some partiality over the decision!!