Help block dirty fuels in western wildlands
By stvasile
@stvasile (7306)
Romania
March 13, 2008 12:34pm CST
Dear Friends,
The Bush administration wants to sacrifice some of the wildest regions of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to produce fuel from two of the most polluting sources: oil shale and tar sands.
This proposed development -- spanning an area of more than two million acres of wildlife habitat and outstanding recreation areas across three states -- could pollute air and water, jeopardize human health and dramatically worsen global warming.
Please go to http://www.savebiogems.org/yellowstone/takeaction
and tell the Bush administration to protect these sensitive
wildlands for future generations and promote cleaner sources of energy instead.
Oil shale is rock that produces oil when heated to extreme
temperatures. Tar sands contain extremely heavy oil mixed with sand and clay. Tar sands development in Canada has displaced wildlife, created toxic waste sites that go on for miles and generated three times the amount of global warming pollution per barrel produced as conventional fuel.
We must act now to shield our own western wildlands from this nightmare scenario. Oil shale and tar sands development could release dangerous toxic elements such as arsenic, selenium, and boron into the Colorado River watershed -- a vital source of drinking water for local communities.
This area is also home to mule deer, elk, mountain lions, black bears, bald eagles and great horned owls and offers exceptional outdoor recreation opportunities.
Go to http://www.savebiogems.org/yellowstone/takeaction
and tell the Bush administration to put the brakes on dirty oil shale and tar sands development in America's West.
Thank you for helping to save the last western wildlife habitats from destructive development.
1 response
@PinayPrincess (554)
• Philippines
13 Mar 08
Ohh its very sad to hear...
You know what, we are experiencing some kind of a problem here in the Philippines...
Its just sad that our government seems to be unfair.. Thinking only for themselves and not for their fellow countrymen.,.. Good luck to you and your good deed..
1 person likes this
@stvasile (7306)
• Romania
13 Mar 08
I can understand the government of poor countries when they think first of the benefit and second of the environment (although I don't support this course of action), but the United States are not the poorest of all countries so I guess it's twice as worse as normal...



