Cheney to American People - "So?"

@anniepa (27955)
United States
March 19, 2008 7:50pm CST
During an interview with Martha Radditz aired on ABC's Good Morning America, VP D1ck Cheney flatly told Radditz he doesn't care what the American people think about the war in Iraq. Below is part of the exchange which can be found here: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/19/cheney-poll-iraq/ CHENEY: On the security front, I think there’s a general consensus that we’ve made major progress, that the surge has worked. That’s been a major success. RADDATZ: Two-third of Americans say it’s not worth fighting. CHENEY: So? RADDATZ So? You don’t care what the American people think? CHENEY: No. I think you cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations in the public opinion polls. Cheney doesn't care what the public thinks but he apparently still thinks he can speak for us; last month, Cheney declared, “The American people will not support a policy of retreat.” If Cheney were actually listening to the “American people,” he would know that 61 percent actually supports the redeployment of U.S. troops. So, what do you think? Is your reaction also, "So"? Annie
2 people like this
6 responses
@whiteheron (4222)
• United States
20 Mar 08
Let's be real here. When has Cheney ever showed much interest in pleasing the public? He is well known as a cold fish... meaning that he tends to be rather uncommunicative unless talking suits his purposes and is rather unfeeling, at least in his public presentation. This is his trademark. If he were to change his stripes now, who would believe him?Vice President Cheney and President Bush are cemented in place. They cannot back down. They cannot admit fault and say that they made a mistake in entering Iraq in the first place as they have too much pride. They attacked a nation which had no weapons of mass destruction because that nation's leader had too much pride and too much fear to admit that he had no such weapons. They attacked Iraq even though there were people on the ground who had provided information that indicated that there were no weapons of mass destruction present. They chose to listen to the one person who was in favor of the war against Iraq because they had a vested interest in doing so... It was not the public welfare or public opinion that they were thinking of then. They lied to the public and attempted to connect 9/11 to Iraq while continuing to support Pakistan and Saudi Arabia which were indeed partly responsible for 9/11. They attacked Iraq while still attempting to conduct a war in Afghanistan. They called those who disagreed with their actions unpatriotic or anti-American and people bought into it and for awhile kept quiet. They conducted a premptive strike against Iraq and were strongly reproached by the United Nations and by the religious community for doing so. They did this and they did not care what anyone said. Do you really expect people like this to start caring now about publc opinion?Does it matter that their term is coming to an end and they are thinking about legacies? If anything, these thoughts just make them more entrenched. They had no plan when they entered Iraq other than to fight. They now have no plan to leave. They do not have the intelligence or wisdom to construct a viable Redout plan and perhaps they are well aware of this fact. They will leave it for the next President and Vice President to deal with... It will be their gift to them and they will not be unhappy to be free of the responsibility for it.
• United States
20 Mar 08
How can you launch a preemptive strike against a country that you are already at war with, and have a ceasefire agreement with? Bush enforced the ceasefire.... end of story.
• United States
20 Mar 08
Anniepa... that question is not even relevant. There were a hell of a lot of American troops killed in WW2 by Japanese and German soldiers during the actual fighting. Since there is no combat between US and Japanese and German troops occurring today .... in what way does that compare or even relate to Iraq now?
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Mar 08
How many troops have been killed in Japan or Germany in recent years? Annie
• United States
20 Mar 08
i am not surprised. I heard part of his interview this morning and changed the channel. It is very clear that he doesnt care about what is happening with the economy because of this war. I am concerned for the troops who are there, the ones who have just come home, and the ones that are on their way now. All of these Americans dying and what is the real cause. I seem to have actually forgotten why the war in Iraq started to begin with. oh yeah weapons of mass destruction. so they didnt find any and Sadaam admitted he lied. what would cheney say to that...so.
3 people like this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
20 Mar 08
So what? Cheney and Bush are right. The president should not base their decisions on public opinion. They should base their decisions on what they think is best for the country. Just because Clinton stuck his finger in the air to test public opinion before he made a decision does not mean that it is required. Bush has never relied on public opi9nion, and that is the mark of a good leader. You liberals are just pissed because Bush is not bowing to your childish demands. I say get over it and grow up. The only reason you are even putting this out is tto try to deflect attention from the curremt Obma flap. It is just another way to try and demonize Bush and company for actually doing their jobs.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Mar 08
"Bush has never relied on public opi9nion, and that is the mark of a good leader." Is he not supposed to be serving the public? I'd say you're well in the minority if you say he's a "good leader"! "You liberals are just pissed because Bush is not bowing to your childish demands. I say get over it and grow up." It's clear it's Bush and Cheney who need to grow up. Their arrogance isn't one bit attractive on men of their age. "The only reason you are even putting this out is tto try to deflect attention from the curremt Obma flap. It is just another way to try and demonize Bush and company for actually doing their jobs." They've done a pretty good job of demonizing themselves! As far as putting this out to deflect attention from the current Obama flap, talk about the pot and the kettle. Time and time again this Administration has come up with a foiled terror attempt or a new threat to cover up the latest scandal or blunder made by one of their own or any good news about the Democrats. Annie
• United States
21 Mar 08
Actually, the liberals and MoveOn have ran a campaign of character assassination against the Bush Administration ever since Gore lost in 2000. So lets talk a bit more about the pot and the kettle...
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
20 Mar 08
This is precisely the reason presidents are elected to four year terms and not one or two years. The American public is very fickle and most people fail to see the big picture. You don't just win a war and drop a country on it's a$s. You need to clean up after yourself, get a friendly government installed, increase stability in the nation, and slowly decrease the military presence. Most Americans think that wars are won overnight and troops return home the next morning. That just isn't how it works and if people took a look at Japan, Germany, and Korea they might actually realize that. Public opinion is important, but it can't be the sole deciding factor in political decisions, especially those involving war.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
20 Mar 08
The American public hasn't been very fickle for the past four years, actually. Even those who claim the "surge is working" admit we've made very little progress politically in Iraq. As for the surge working, it's a simple matter of too little, too late. The things that were done last year should have been done from the start and then maybe there would be several American troops still alive or intact and several hundred thousand Iraqis still alive. Annie
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
22 Mar 08
Apparently you consider yourself much more informed than the average person so I have to ask, where do you get your information? From Fox News and the right wing blogs that are always posted here? You can certainly disagree with me but don't say I'm not informed because I watch as much news from various sources as more anyone, I read many different news magazines and newspapers plus I'm constantly looking things up online. I also do watch Stewart, Colbert, Olbermann and Maher who, with the exception of Olbermann may all be considered comedians but they also have intelligent debates with different guests and panels. Keith Olbermann may be the "anti-Bill O'" but his facts always check out. I'm not sure how we strayed this far from the original topic here, which was the incredible arrogance of D1ckhead Cheney. Who, by the way Republican Lincoln Chafee called the most arrogant person he'd ever met. Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
21 Mar 08
Annie most people know nothing about the war in Iraq. All they know is what they hear on the Daily Show or the Colbert report. The real news constantly reports our losses but says nothing about the progress being made in Iraq. With information like that it's impossible for the average American to truly understand what is going on in Iraq unless they have friends or relatives directly involved.
@raydene (9871)
• United States
20 Mar 08
Well Doll He came from Vermont but they say they do not want him back! We don't want him in NY either. xoxoxoxoxoxoxo
3 people like this
@skinnychick (6905)
• United States
21 Mar 08
LOL more great people news in politics. Smug; just what we need in office. But then again, has any other politician ever cared what America thought anyway??