Patience... is it a virtue?

@vijigopi (991)
United States
March 21, 2008 3:08pm CST
I recently read this quote "Patience too has its limits.. when it crosses the line it becomes cowardice". I thought about it a lot. Yes, materially speaking, it does look like cowardice, when you are too patient. But what about persons who want to spiritually evolve by controlling their anger? Are they cowards too? I believe those that are looking to expand their divinity definitely need to develop patience beyond any limits. I have heard about an incident that happened to a great saint(named Eknath in Maharashtra). A miscreant deliberately spat on him for over a hundred times(not exaggerating here!!) just after he came out of the river after a bath to do his worship, and he serenely turned back to the river to take a bath again without a word of anger.. for 108 times!! The miscreant fell at his feet and begged forgiveness! I agree it is not possible for everyone, and I definitely would say I draw the line very very soon, but do you think that being patient is being a coward? Where do you draw the limit line?
2 people like this
3 responses
@Tetchie (2932)
• Australia
21 Mar 08
It's a good question. I'm wondering about context to this quote though. When does crossing the line of patience become cowardice? Cowardice can happen when through your inaction you allow someone elses tardiness to hamper your movement forward and you allow this because you are unable to change the situation. Cowardice to not take a stand. Tolerance is what is required to have compassion for a person who is by nature slow but is doing their best to fulfill your requirements. If a person is spiritually evolved enough they can look at the person who is spitting on them - as in the above story - and see that it is by not reacting to being spat at that will in turn have the miscreant no longer need to spit. If you give no reflection to an incident there is nothing to react at. Though in a different context, if someone was deliberately impeding my progress, I would have the will and bravado to take steps to overcome without reaction. It is called choice. You can do that without imparting negative attitudes toward the person who is impeding you. To let it happen and not take action is cowardice.
2 people like this
@lecanis (16647)
• Murfreesboro, Tennessee
22 Mar 08
Very well said, Tetchie.
1 person likes this
@Tetchie (2932)
• Australia
22 Mar 08
Why, thank you lecanis.
@vijigopi (991)
• United States
22 Mar 08
You have a lot of good points to consider.. First I agree with you on the fact that "If you give no reflection to an incident there is nothing to react at". But how do you reach that "no reflection" attitude? I am confused because I have read that the more a person can take insult and injury and still bear no illwill, the more he evolves towards Divinity. The one that does not react either to praise or insult is an enlightened man. Cowardice is in no case warranted for. The fact that you begin to fight at some point itself is a witness that we are not cowards. But some people can put up with a lot of misbehaviour... maybe they are waiting that some sort of conscience will make the other person stop and they take action only when they see no improvement. Like you said, if there is a way we can do that without imparting negatives towards the person impeding us, then it is fine. In case we are not able to find such a way, then how should we react that we don't fall back on our spiritual journey?
@kalav56 (11464)
• India
14 Jun 08
Patience when it leads to exploitation of any kind or promotion of evil intentions on the offender's side would definitely be cowardice.While it is a crime to cheat itis also an even greater crime to let yourself be cheated. [emarathe, emartradhe-- kutta kuttadhan kunivu--is it not? ] We cannot talk of saints and prophets in the same light as us ordinary mortals. They were embodiments of virue and belonged to another plane. We can only endeavour to take a few steps in the path that they have charted out but this has also to be considered in the light of the age in which we are living in and the result of our patience. As a result of being patient, if we are going to achieve what that sadhu did then it is great, but in a real life situation people mistake goodness and patience for weakness in many cases. Where do we draw the line/-vey valid question- I would say that the line has to be drawn if our unbiassed , objective unemotional assessment of the situation gives us a warning signal.This is where emotional detachment comes to play.[this is for ordinary situations and confrontations with people like all of us]I am a person who would hesitate to draw the line and I know the effects of my hesitation too.That is why I am saying all this with conviction.
1 person likes this
@kalav56 (11464)
• India
15 Jun 08
I agree that love is the most elevating characteristic in this world and that no animosity should be borne in mind against anyone.But, one thing I would like to point out is that it would be better to avoid any transaction and potentially controversial subjective issue with others. because in objective situations when people are in a club or working for some common cause this is different and can be handled even if one person does not behave well. But generally, if you analyse a situation objectively [the Sadhu's case is different and as I said he is a mentor and a preceptor and like the merchant who tore every bit of his cloth that was on sale,[remember the story where he showed enormous patience to the rude customer-I also have a vague recollection that it was Valluvar]]he teaches a lesson in patience..To the SADHU the rude man is insignificant, a pebble in his beach and being a saint he displays these saintly qualities. We can take the lesson from these people and apply it to cases where we have no direct transaction with the said person. If someone hurls abuse at us for no reason then we can just smile and walk away. But if we are in a situation that calls for cooperation by two or three grown up individuals ,1] they must have the same wavelength [to come to a compromise] 2] you can never teach an equal different sense of values --especially when they are adults and unless two people are willing to be totally objective and analytical , this is never possible in this world because we are all individualistic and have a multitude of perceptions. I believe in the virtue of patience but as I pointed out earlier we are all imperfect human beings and life has taught me to be emotionally detached if we should not get hurt. .We can only learn to agree to disagree in this world when we deal with equals, adults, and avoid potentially explosive situations. As far as I am concerned it is impossible for me to behave as patiently as even a percentage of how the Sadhu did. As I am a very mild person by nature who shies away from conflicts I have now come to this conclusion.My experiences and outcomes of my patience have made me write this.Once again it is purely subjective.We should never take things lying down and draw the line quickly.Everyone does draw the line and only idealistic people [like all of us ] take a long time to draw the line and then bottle our emotions when we are hurt
1 person likes this
@vijigopi (991)
• United States
14 Jun 08
What you say is true for people who try to cheat others. I think knowing that a person is cheating you and still keeping quiet is cowardice. Firstly because the offender does not know that we know what he does. He will just think that he was successful in outwitting us. But can we not be patient and still stop the other person from cheating us? Can we not try to change the other person's attitude by making him realise that he is trying to do a mistake and we just want him to stop it knowing it is harmful to him as well as others. Is there no way of tapping a person's conscience instead of getting him to task? I agree saints and prophets are different than us. They know what to do to change a person's mind. But don't we have to learn a lesson from their lives - that love is the most powerful force on earth and anybody using love to change a person will most likely be successful. Because a man has both good and bad characteristics. There is always the possibility that the good conscience in him will tell him when pointed out by another in the most loving manner that he is wrong. But fighting will only make the offender go in defense mode. He will only try to justify his own actions rather than admit he is wrong.
@lilaclady (28207)
• Australia
21 Mar 08
no I don't think patience is being a coward, I think it is great if you have it, it just means you are a less stressful person, getting all hyped up about something is not good for you so being patient is a good thing for your health i think.