FOOD for THOUGHT

I consider these studies to be nonsensical meandering jabberings of educated idiots with too much time on their hands hoping for more grant money to finance their foolhardiness. This is so much like the last great egg scare that since has been thoroughly debunked and since rescinded. Food is food, and as the article itself said it was neither good or bad. There is too much emphasis in trying to designate overall "groups" of people as being affected by this behavior or that food, or whatever activity or habits that people indulge in. These studies aimed at groups mean nothing, because it is individuals who are affected differently by their overall lifestyle. While eggs may not be good for one person, they may be great for another. Everyone is unique, and every individual is affected differently bey different things, combination of things, and circumstances. I categorically reject groups studies on the grounds that they are inaccurate, inconclusive, and completely meaningless. At worst they are a wild guess, and at best they are an educated guess. I am also appalled at the whole health risk issue... while we all want to be healthy, I for one don't want to be healthy at the expense of quality of life. What good does it do if I live to be 100 years old but cannot enjoy it because some study says everything that gives life meaning is a health risk? What then is the point of it all other than to give some activist group another way to limit our freedoms and individual choices with big brother watching over us? If I can't enjoy life, then there is no point in life. Pardon me while I light another.

We eat eggs occasionally. My son could eat them all day - gross I know. I don't see anything wrong with eggs in moderation, as in one or less per week.