Should Evolution be considered a religion?

United States
April 10, 2008 12:18pm CST
I've been trying to get some response on this question. I'm working on a paper for college, and would like to "hear" other people's opinions. I'm not up for debate, so don't try to sell me on your personal theory. Just share what think about this idea. I am not big into Science, only need as much of it to understand how to live healthy, and how to conserve our natural resources. I am however, very interested in philosophy and human development. So religion is a big part of my studies. After reading much of the debates here, I have made some valuable observations. Neither side wants to admit that there belief system may have some errors. And evolutionists refuse to admit they don't have all the answers, but they will rely on science to provide them...in due time. They fight for there cause, they ignore opposing evidence and refute it by bringing in religion without fully scientifically proving the theories irrelevant. Hmmmmmm...What do you think?
2 people like this
7 responses
@deebomb (15304)
• United States
15 Apr 08
Any and all religion is based on faith. Evolution is just as much a religion as is Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism. As much as the evolutionist wants to believe it can be proved it can't. The problem is the news media takes every thing that a scientist finds and makes a comment on as being a fact for evolution. It seems to me that the news media is more experts than are the scientists. Most evolutionists can't see the missing facts. so In my opinion it is a religion just as the others are.
1 person likes this
• United States
15 Apr 08
There are onl a select few who see evolutionism as a religion, I am one of them. Did you know that the majority of the religions, were named from outsiders? Let's spread the word as much as we can, and soon the world will see it in a true light, and it will be taken out of schools due to its faith base. Or at least taught along side intelligent design???
1 person likes this
@whywiki (6066)
• Canada
10 Apr 08
Religion has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution is a theory that has been proven time and time again. They have even found the missing link. Religion is belief of some entity that may or may not exist. One is science and the other is just a want to believe in something so you can face eventual demise. Science and fiction shouldn't be confused. No evolution shouldn't be considered a religion as it isn't.
• United States
10 Apr 08
Can you direct me to the evidence of the beginning of microorganisms? Forgive my ignorance, like I said, I'm not big into the science thing. But I do want to understand as much as possible so I don't end up looking like an idiot speaking with my heart instead of my brain.
• United States
10 Apr 08
Thanks rev (hehe) for your response. One thing I need to say is, evolution has been proven to some extent. There have been documented mutations of species. The whole, survival of the species topic. But you are right, when they get down to the very first, they rely on their faith in science. That's why I say it should be considered a religion. Thee are many religions out there, that people of a different religion refuse to believe, but non the less, they are still religious beliefs. Right?
• United States
10 Apr 08
It is no more a foolish idea of evolution as a religion than to worship a tree or a cow. There are many types of religions that people who do not believe or practice cannot understand. In fact to understand a religion is to believe in it.
• United States
11 Apr 08
I believe that religion and science are like two sides of a coin. One looks at one side of the penny and sees a face and says the coin is a picture of a face. The other sees the building on the back and says no it is clearly a picture of a building. They both argue and are certain that the other is wrong. In fact, they are both right and yet simultaneously they are both wrong. lol. I think to find the truth religion and science need to work together. Instead of spending so much time and energy fighting they should both seek the truth together. I would not consider evolution a religion but rather another way of examining life.
• United States
11 Apr 08
I like your point of view. Unfortunately, I doubt enough people will ever be able to see both sides of the coin, and evolutionists will always have reign in the science genre. That's why adding to a religion curriculum would open doors to intelligent design, therefore giving kids a well rounded view. And perhaps in the future, our children will be able to accomplish what we and our predecessors have never been able to.
• United States
11 Apr 08
I hope so. Through the Baha'i Faith I work to promote understanding between science and religion as well as between the various religions. It is no easy task but for every person we bring understanding to there is a little less conflict in the world. Thank you for the discussion.
@Pose123 (21635)
• Canada
22 Apr 08
Hi edgyk8inmomma, Evolution isn't a religion. Religion is based on faith in a higher power. Many people believe in evolution, but I haven't had it explained to my satisfaction. For me evolution does not disprove God, as some people think. Blessings.
• United States
22 Apr 08
Isn't science and scientific evidence a greater "power" that evolutionists have faith in? Do they respond to any scientific evidence that goes against their beliefs (oops...theories, same thing) with openness, or do they stick to their dogma and shut that evidence down because it goes against those beliefs? I don't think evolution disproves god either, neither does many of the religions out there. Whether or not it disproves god has nothing to do with whether or not it should be considered a religion.
@jormins (1223)
• United States
10 Apr 08
I agree with the above poster evolution and religion aren't two things that really relate to each other. I am no expert on evolution but have studied it and I really believe everyone is partially right in their theories, just the hard core religious are too stuck on a literal belief of the Bible. There's no reason God can't be behind evolution. This might be a good movie for you to rent. Its a good look at Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution: http://www.flockofdodos.com/
@jormins (1223)
• United States
11 Apr 08
Its hard for me to say anyone believing in evolution is being too literal of science. Its not like they are taking one source extremely literally. Yes evolution is a lot of extrapolation however it has many, many sources and many, many facts behind it. Whereas I think while the Bible is an excellent source, its just that, one source with many questions surrounding its true origins and editions. I do believe Atheists and people like you describe who say they don't believe in a creator or God really do believe in a creator or God, they just name it differently or have a different way of viewing it (really more anti-religion than anti-god I think). I guess you could say for these people Science or Math is a form of God for them.
1 person likes this
• United States
10 Apr 08
Thanks for your response. I too agree that God can be behind evolution. Some of it has been proven beyond a shadow of doubt. You say the hardcore religious are too stuck on a literal belief of the Bible to accept evolution. Aren't hard core evolutionists too stuck on literal interpretations of science to accept relevant research that could end up proving the existence of some sort of creator?
@rhykos7 (74)
24 Apr 08
no evolution should not be considered religion at all, in fact evolution should be considered anti-religion. the simple reason for this as that evolution is virtually a fact and the evidence is overwhelming. all religion is really, is a superstition based upon old wives tales and fear. i am not trying to have a go at religion here i am just trying to explain why evolution can never be a religion. calling evolution a religion would be like calling maths or algebra religion. they are sciences which is a million miles away from religion one interesting thing about evolution is that we are the only species that has stopped physically evolving because evolution is no longer a forced process for us, and we will vary more and more as a specie as time goes on. science has already got all the answers to evolution except the really small details at the start of evolution. if you really look hard into evolution studies you will find it to be almost full proof except what actually started it in the 1st place. this starting point, many religious scientists like to say it was divine intervention that got the evolution ball rolling and that religion can fit in with evolution, but as always science has to bend over backwards to allow religion to be possible. there's my 20cents worth for you
• United States
24 Apr 08
Thank you for sharing your two cents. I still have to disagree. If it isn't a religion why does it meet all the standards for a religion base? *The dogma is scientific procedure. *People often argue the deity question, but not all religions believe in a deity, sometimes its just a common thought...ie scientific evidence, or proof. *People of religions gather together to learn and grow...science labs, press conferences, webblogs. *People who follow a religion believe their theory is the only plausible for whatever reason...evolutionist have shot down every religious basd theory that has crossed the table. *Religions rely on faith of some sort in the evidence of things unseen...evolutionist have faith in only the visual evidence, but keep tryint to find the evidence to prove the things they can't yet see, and stick it all under the same category. What do you think?
@rhykos7 (74)
24 Apr 08
"all the standards of a religions base"-come off it? you could say that about drinking a cup of tea the dogma is scientific procedure- procedures are in place to objectify, recheck and ensure all evidence is correct and accurate-which is pretty much the opposite of religion where nobody is allowed to question it. "sometimes its a common thought, ie scientific evidence or proof" - are you pulling my leg here-are you comparing one mans idea with scientific evidence? "people gather together"-so every time you are with other people that is a religion? is my work a religion-is going to the pub my religion? "people follow religious faith as only plausible theory" there is a good reason scientists have shot down all religious theories-because not one of those theories has a scratch of evidence or any back bone to them-if they came up with something plausible then science may actually have a challenge from religion instead of the scientist just laughing it off as ridiculous. when it come to evidence-you cant really argue in favor of religion-all they can say is you cant disprove god-there are a lot of things that cant be disproved, but that doesnt make them real where as you cant argue against visual evidence. evolutions biggest evidence is DNA-if you look into this edgy momma you will understand how scientists are able to prove of our evolutionary history- in a response to robs brooklyn girl- we did not evolve from monkeys and apes-monkeys and apes both evolved from the same species that we did, which i guess makes them our cousins-by the way thats why we have a tail bone because we used to have tails-probably for balance as we swung through trees like tarzan lol-we were a cool species than