Bush Smarter than Gore on Climate

United States
April 12, 2008 1:51pm CST
Although I do not subscribe to the flawed theory that CO2 is the driving force behind our climate ... I believe it to be driven by the Sun and water vapor... Bush and Gore bioth think CO2 is the culprit. Last year there appeared a startling comparison between the house of Bush and the house of Gore, with the house of Bush being more environmentally friendly than the house of Gore. http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp Now it has happed again in the area of how Global Warming and the evil influence of CO2 can beset be fought, and the verdict is in.... Bush beats Gore on Global Warming and common sense legislation. On top of that, Bush also beats the IPCC at the same time over the same issue. Who is the masked man that rode in and made this amazing discovery? That would be "prominent climate alarmist Tom Wigley who essentially endorsed President Bush’s approach to global warming, while criticizing that of Gore’s co-Nobelist, the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)" Read all about it here... http://www.junkscience.com/ByTheJunkman/20080403.html Further details can be found here..... http://junkscience.com/apr08/Nature_Dangerous_Assumptions.pdf "Wigley, a lead author of the most recent IPCC report, describes that document as relying on “unrealistic” and “unachievable” CO2 emissions scenarios -- even for the present decade." Although these individuals are erroneously blaming CO2 emissions for our climate... this once again shows that Bush has a better understanding of big picture than Gore does. Can you imagine the mess we would be in if Gore HAD been elected? Bush has already beaten Gore twice in Global Warming and environmental issues. Any thoughts?
3 people like this
2 responses
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
12 Apr 08
Gore is as dumb as a stump. He's an embarrassment to the environmental movement at every turn. What he is, is a snake oil salesman who dupes those who care about the environment.
1 person likes this
• United States
13 Apr 08
When it comes to environmental issues Gore really misses the mark. The sad part is that with all of the attention being focused on CO2 production, the real issues are being ignored. We should be concentrating on pollution and clean air, not on climate change. There is a very real difference between the two.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
12 Apr 08
What you do not understand is that Al Gore bought Carbon Credits from his own company to off set his hugh carbon footpit. It is almost like the question do you want someone that says what you want, or does what you want. Bush practices what he preaches, Al Gore only preaches. If Al Gore wants to stop Global warming he needs to put a plug in his mouth to stop all of that hot air that comes out of it.
• United States
12 Apr 08
What makes you think I don't understand any of it? Buying carbon credits does not change anything, all that does is to help Gore try to reduce his guilt factor in being so wasteful and harmful to the environment. Carbon credits are nothing more than a license to pollute. There is no stopping Global Warming at all. Man made Global Warming is a hoax perpetrated by Gore and the IPCC in order to bring in funds for Gore personally and for the UN, of which the IPCC is a part of. Yes, Gore does need to limit his output of CO2 as does the majority of Congress.... especially the liberal side ... and closing their mouths would be a good start.
2 people like this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
12 Apr 08
Destiny I was joking about you did not understand. Some time I try to joke and it does not come off well.
• United States
13 Apr 08
Global warming is something I take very seriously due to the massive spending spree that we are about to embark upon for no good reason as it is not man made in the first place. coolgadget ... One of those links I provided tell exactly why Bush's house is more environmentally friendly then Gore's house is. I am very disappointed in Bush for falling for the man made global warming hoax, because there is no basis in fact to support that theory.
1 person likes this