Batista or undertaker who is the best
By sundarsweb
@sundarsweb (107)
India
April 20, 2008 8:08am CST
I still cant figure out whether batista or undertaker is the best.Past week on smack down when both fought the match became a tie due to count out missed by both.this week they again clash but this time for the World Heavy Weight Championship.So who among these two do you think is tye best performer.
11 responses
@MGjhaud (23119)
• Philippines
27 Apr 08
My father admires Batista and he loves wrestling so much. And I too loves Batista over Undertaker. I guess undertaker is too much of an entertaiment. He has the weird look and black make-up and clothes. Batista projects as a wrestler.
I guess Batista, as the current champion (last time I checked), will win the fight.
@masalawnabata (92)
• Philippines
6 Jun 08
In our country Philippines, we admire Batista coz he is a half filipino :)
but if we compare taker and batista, i could say the undertaker is the best, taker been there don that, while batista he has many things to do like winning chapionship more than once
@nixta619 (43)
•
29 Jun 08
in my opinion i think batista is better than the phenom because he won the title from edge with out a submission, unlike the undertaker. plus the animal has been able to make the undertaker loose and he might have won the last man standing match on smackdown, when he speared undertaker off the ramp, but the thing fell on top of both of them before either one of them could get up and move
batista im sure would have won that,bbut he fell out too.
he also won the championship from the undertaker times before
@chelle39574 (215)
• United States
27 Apr 08
hands down Undertaker although batista is good i have to say the undertaker has proven himself over and over
@mefadon3 (296)
• United States
23 Apr 08
The Undertaker is better. Batista has beaten the Undertaker twice, but the second victory was assisted by Edge. Undertaker has more victories over Batista.
@figjam00 (1445)
• India
23 Apr 08
I answer is very easy -Undertaker is the best. I think is Batista is not yet in the league of Undertaker. I mean Taker is the verteran in the business and wrestling consistently in the WWE. On the other hand Batista is just on WWE for 5 years or so. Batista is nothing but muscle power and on other hand deadman excel at every area like submissions, high flying etc. But I got to admit lately Batista is playing great and he's on great form.
@astonmartin (85)
• India
22 Apr 08
As both these men are very powerful individuals. but if u go by record batista has only deafeted the undertaker once. on the other hand undertaker has deafeted batista many times . so as the record suggests undertaker is better . but as you know records are sometimes misleading .so it is quite early to tell.but as my personal opinion i think undertaker is better,
