college students ?or rascal?

Tweet

Debate or quarrel ?It's ridiculous to pinpoint. It took place in the class of a course called MAODENGSAN. The course is compulsory in chinese collge .For it's a summary of political wisdom of great chinese leader .As a chinese college student ,it's a most essential request for us to learn something about it .Though there are sizable amount of quite valuable theory that can be applied to solving variable problems ,from political events to business affair ,down to interpersonal relationship , it still seems not a bit tedious and banal to us .If we don't skip the class ,then we would choose to do something esle or even chat or sleep in the class .In a word ,such kind of course which relate too much to theory is not to our fancy. However,this course is fairly important .It makes up an immense part in the total credits .So no matter how reluctant we are ,we have no choice but to pay as much emphasis as possible .The credit is made up of two parts .One is determined by the last exam .The other has something to do with a topic we are forced to study outside the class .The whole class are divided into several groups .Each group confer over the topic together .The result is expected to be made into a verbal edition as well as a DV.It's really a big challenge for all of us .Not only because those so-called spirits are too profound to catch on ,but aslo for the technique of making DVis unfamiliar to most of us. Worst still,my group and another one from a different major are the first two groups to present our topic result .We have been bothered by it for a long period Sometimes i even felt we were going to either break down or go mad .As a lack of experience ,i don't think our job is a good one ,let alone live up to someone's expection . Today came the reckoning day .After seeing both groups' work ,all i could say is just so bad . To be honest ,i still know little about the topic after so much effort .And most of others seem share the same feeling with me .You can hardly imagine how miserable to get through the dull reprsentation .One student delievered his monologue ,dispensing one dry fact after another .He droned on and on until it came to the last word . The second part of the representation was questioning.We two groups were to be question by other student .Out this stage ,one of students from my institute pointed out the other institute's shortages .Her intense adverse critism promoted the war .Student from the other institute fought back at once .They argued that our objective was cnclear and our DV was really sucked .As soon as that finished his last word ,student from my institute stood up and began to emulate the flaws of the other institute .With gives and takes ,the class turned into a leteral mess which seemed uncontrolable . We just came to present our job ,not to attack each other .How our jobs are ,both of us have already seen .Maybe the first student not meaned to ctitisize anyone .She just gave her opinion.But others took it as a attack to their dignity .I think it is not expected in a uinversity .Then what seperate us from those rascal?