Mexiamerica --- Do you think it will happen? What are your thoughts on this?

It goes so far beyond that. What I am hearing and reading more about is not only the integration of Mexico and America but also the inclusion of Canada in this union. And from what I am reading this is only the first step. From what I am reading and hearing the government in conjuction with the United Nations is working on a plan to integrate the entire world. It will start with a single monetary unit worldwide. From there they will begin working on bringing all nations under one umbrella government using a group like the United Nations to rule over it. Of course my husband doesn't think this will ever happen and certainly not in our lifetimes but I don't know. I've seen the government do some pretty sneaky things in our history. I don't doubt anything at this point.

I would hope to heck that we didnt fight at the alamo for not. and might come down to another one. I think it is ashame that they can drive theeir trucks up here a it takes work from out truckers!

Hello Whiteheron, On the Saturday morning of Labor Day Weekend, 2007 the first authorized Mexican trucks began rolling on American highways -- much to the dismay and displeasure of many. Incidentally, the timing of the transgression against U.S. sovereignty is not to be overlooked -- a major holiday, where many are away from the t.v.s, internet, and newspapers. Among the displeased are the Teamsters and Independent truckers, who have been engaged in a long, legal battle over this proposal. One major contention is that those Mexican truckers are taking work away from USA truckers. Before this plan, Mexican trucks had only a 25 mile buffer to unload their cargo on to American trucks. Not anymore! http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8474.html http://video.nbcsandiego.com/player/?id=150440 http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/index.htm There is much hullabaloo over the 'North American Union', and the "Security and Prosperity Partnership for North America". Most issues pertaining to both are disected and discussed at the link below: http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/NAU/ What are my perspectives on the issue? Well, I am an ardent fan of sovereignty. While the values of Canada and the United States might easily blend, I tend to think the Canadians prefer some 'distance' from the troubles that plague the USA. Conversely, the values of Mexico cannot blend with those of either Canada or the USA, as long as Mexican officials effort themselves to maintain such constricting class divisions. The Mexican Constitution is very much a design to keep the rich in bounty, and the poor right where they are. The clearest indicator of this are the Mexican legal provisions relating to land ownership. Mexico is still a 'patron' society, which would not blend well with the 'equal under the law' aspect of the USA or Canada. Moreover, I live in a border state. I have had more than enough 'Aztlan Reconquista' nonsense. I have no tolerance for anyone, Mexican or otherwise, telling me that my land is not my own. As such, I will fight to my last breath to prevent such a merger, where our national sovereignty would be sacrificed for the sake of big business, and the acquisition of wealth. Not in my lifetime! Hopefully, not ever! What I find most troubling is that the banking industry is already discussing the feasibility of such a merger. This is true of Canadian and USA bankers. Pathos does not even begin to express my distaste over bankers embracing the prospect of the abandon of our Founding Father's vision, and the U.S. Constitution, in the almighty pursuit of riches. Grrrr! Below are two links outlining some of the economic discussions relating to this betrayal of national sovereignty. The W.T.O. and the Global Alliance will stop at nothing to advance this agenda. The only thing standing in their way is the will of 'We The People'. If our tendency toward apathy remains, we shall forever see the landscape of the America that we know -- simply disappear! http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/v5/content/subscribe?user_URL=http://ctv2.theglobeandmail.com%2Fservlet%2Fstory%2FRTGAM.20070521.wrxdodge22%2Fbusiness%2FBusiness%2FbusinessBN%2Fctv-business&ord=67663492&force_login=true http://oldfraser.lexi.net/publications/critical_issues/1999/amero/ On a final note: the first respondent (I'm sorry, I've forgotten the member's I.D.) is absolutelty correct that this North American Union proposal is very much directed by not only the U.N., but the World Trade Organization W.T.O., as well. If anyone doubts the globalization agenda of the U.N., they need only read the words of the U.N. Below is a 2004 excerpt, and link from a U.N. General Assembly report, touting its efforts toward globalization. [b][i]"Globalization ... In an era ofincreasing globalization, Member States asserted that such challenges could beaddressed effectively only through collective global action and called upon theinternational community to work in harmony to build a better world for all.... Many delegationsfelt that globalization had yielded unequivocally positive results. Yet thecontinued imbalance in the distribution of its benefits, the progressive wideningof the gap between developed and developing countries and the worseningeconomic conditions in several countries in the South and the related adverseeffects on the environment would accentuate discontent and frustration. Suchproblems could even lead to violence and instability.... Withglobalization, the inter-linkages and inter dependence among the people of theworld had increased as well as the movement of people across borders. Speakersstressed that migration facilitates the transfer of skills and knowledge andstimulates economic growth and development. Delegations urged all nations tocooperate in ensuring the protection of fundamental rights of migrant workersand called on them to exert every effort to accede to the InternationalConvention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Membersof Their Families. Delegations recognized that to make globalization fairer, theMillennium Declaration must be implemented and the international community mustwaste no more time in achieving the Millennium Development Goals. They welcomedthe report of the World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization andsuggested that the United Nations system should study the report’srecommendations before the review of the Millennium Declaration. Shifting awayfrom a narrow focus of markets, the Report’s recommendations paid greaterattention to people and their varied needs and interests." i]http://www.un.org/esa/desa/desaNews/desa86.html [/i][/b]