Why I Don't Live "Green"...
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
May 14, 2008 5:19pm CST
Back when I was growing up (in the 70s), there was that days' version of "living green". Recycling was just getting going, Woodsy Owl taught us to "Give a Hoot, Don't Pollute" and that Indian guy with the tear in his eye was a moving reminder to not litter.
I also remember being taught how Solar Power, Wind Turbines and Ethanol was going to save us all from the evils of OPEC and big oil.
I agree that we shouldn't litter, and there are economical ways to cut down on pollution, but 30 years have taught us that those were about the only points that the "save the planet" crowd made that stood the test of time.
Wind turbines... is there any form of energy production that is more wasteful and less productive than wind energy? I mean, if you want to put up a turbine for your own needs, go for it. Wind turbines require vast agreage to produce only a little power. How much of our nation are we willing to dedicate to wind power? Apparently not much, even those who believe it has benefits aren't willing to have their view tarnished by wind farms.
Solar power. This was once sold as the ultimate in free energy... What life taught us is that it's a pretty expensive way to get "free" energy. 30 years of innovations and we can't even power a small town with it, much less a city.
Ethanol... Now here's one lie that just keeps on lying. As it turns out, it uses more power than it's worth; it takes thousands of gallons of water; and when you run it in your cars, you get worse gas mileage.
Now we are learning how the ethanol plants are polluting the water and air more than refineries.
So, I won't throw trash on the ground, I will walk when I can, I will turn the lights out when I'm not in the room...but as far as trying to live "Green"?
Sorry, but living green causes too much pollution.
1 person likes this
3 responses
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
15 May 08
This is the solution:
Nuclear power and pure electric cars.
Nuclear power is not what it was 30, 40, 50 years ago. If we 'updated' all the current plants and built more, and used electric cars (the technology for which is making strides every day--the batteries now outlast the cars, and unlike an ICE, you can easily and literally upgrade the electric car when the time comes for a new battery in a way that costs a ton of money with an ICE car), our foreign dependency on oil would vanish.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 May 08
Absolutely, Nuclear power is the best alternative. The only problem is the eco freaks and their childish rants to congress keep the nuclear option from reality.
Eco freaks that lie about caring about our dependence on oil.
1 person likes this
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
15 May 08
They just need to realize that overall, nuclear IS greener and cleaner than coal or oil.
With wind, it kills so many birds that the cost of hiring someone to drive around and clean up the pile of carcasses completely offsets any money saved energy-wise.
Solar's good as a supplement, but at least currently, it's not good enough by itself. As technology progesses, it'll be worth it to stick solar panels on every roof, as it's a source of energy that takes up no additional space.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 May 08
Exactly! The alternative sources are good as supplements, but they have no real viability as a main energy source.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
23 Jul 08
ParaTed I will start giving a hoot when Al Gore starts giving a hoot. Al Gore speaking about global warming on meet the press last Sunday was asked about living in the 25000 sqft house of his got me to think. Alge and his wife live in a house that is 15 time the size of the house that me, and my hubby live in. Because Alge buys carbon credits that mack his house carbon netrual, but I am to believe that my house has a hugh carbon footprint. Alge drives around in a limo and flies in a jet, but that is okay because he buys carbon credits. I have one of those evil suvs and a full size truck, and once again I am the one with the gaint carbon footprint. So I came up with this opinion when Alge starts giving a hoot so will I.
Living green is expensive as you pointed out. Look at the difference between green products than their counterproduct. Pipe dreams and fairy dust will not replace tried and true methods of producing energy. Coal, nuclear, and good old fashion gas is were it is at.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
2 Aug 08
Alge has never once "given a hoot", he is nothing but a snake oil salesman with a niche market.
This is all anyone needs to know about Alge and the rest of the eco-extortionists.
1 person likes this
@olivebranch56 (910)
• United States
18 May 08
Our nice little local government has decided we should all recycle. I have a family of 7. Our disposal co brings out a little green tub, no bigger than a drink crate. No explanation of what we were to do with it. A few weeks later, we get a little note with our bill saying they forgot to mention that we will be charged for the privilege of recycling. Well my family can fill this little tote up in less than a day, much less a week. Then they want us to rinse out the bottles, take off labels, heck they should be paying me a salary for doing the recyclers job. I have yet to put one plastic bottle in the tub and waste my energy taking it to the road. If our government is so worried about the environment they should never had allowed manufacturers to start making plastic containers in the first place, I much preferred glass, you can taste the plastic in beverages.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
19 May 08
Yeah, I remember when we did get paid for recycling, but then local government's started mandating it and charging us for the trouble. It turns out that a lot of them charge for the service, then it all ends up in landfill anyway.
Now we learn that it costs more, and is more polluting to recycle some products.
Thanks greenies!
1 person likes this



