Bush is apparently rejecting any bail-outs of mortgage lenders
By dragon54u
@dragon54u (31633)
United States
May 19, 2008 9:39pm CST
What do you think of this? From what I know, they were perfectly aware that a lot of those loans were risky, to say the least. Manipulated incomes, poor credit ratings, and doubtful income were all overlooked in favor of lending money to people who really couldn't afford to buy a property. So I have no sympathy for them and feel that they should bail themselves out. I don't want my tax money easing the price they pay for their greed.
However, the fallout from their greed is affecting all of us by bringing down the economy with the loss of jobs and the difficulty in getting mortgages that is being experienced by people who are good candidates! Last May, when I got my very first mortgage (at 53 years old!) I almost felt like a criminal the way they checked me out and demanded verification of every source of income I had, past employment, credit reports and then repeated requests for the same! I knew why they were doing it but it felt pretty crappy and I was nervous I wouldn't get the house--not because I wasn't a good credit risk but because of their caution in a crashing market.
So, I almost didn't get my house because of greedy lenders.
Do you think we should bail them out? If we don't, is it going to have a bad effect on an economy that's already in crisis? I'd really like to know some opposing opinions! (Or agree with me and make me feel smart!)
1 person likes this
2 responses
@jer31558 (3683)
• United States
20 May 08
I think maybe help them out, but not bail them out. I think that whatever help they may received only after completing a course on money management and budgeting. I have been on the other side of that fence, and it wasn't poor planning or overextending myself, I was due to changes in circumstances. Though we may plan for many things, we cannot plan for everything. A few years back, a mill near here shut down causing around 700 people to be out of work. Being a small town, there wasn't jobs to even come close to what they were making for those that were lucky enough to find one. I think that there should be help for those that need it, but I don't think the government should just go out and buy people houses when they get into a tight.
1 person likes this
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
20 May 08
I agree with you regarding consumers. But our senate is talking of bailing out the big lenders, whose greed led to this mess. I think we should let them suffer the consequences.
The money management course is a very good idea for the individual borrowers, though. Too many people now don't know how to manage their money, they just know how to borrow to maintain a lifestyle that's beyond their means.
1 person likes this
@dodoguy (1292)
• Australia
20 May 08
Hi dragon54u,
In my opinion, if the market was left to sort itself out without manipulation and government intervention to protect the interests of the rich bankers, then whatever pain that had to be suffered would have been over and done with years ago.
The distortion of normal market forces to save the greedy from the consequences of their actions is just going to make the inevitable economic collapse substantially worse than it needed to be. The pain, when it finally takes hold, is going to be ten times worse because it has been delayed by successive games of smoke and mirrors and musical chairs.
To be honest, I think Americans are already in an economic crisis, but the government is still in denial. And it'll probably stay that way until something sufficiently awful happens to motivate common people to get off their complacent butts, get organized and revolt against the people in power who have orchestrated the whole mess.
Meanwhile, none of that helps with the day to day pain of trying to make ends meet.
Even here in Australia, where we're supposedly enjoying an economic boom on the back of China's and India's economic growth, the divide between the rich and the poor is getting ever wider, and a lot of the people who think they are rich are already bankrupt with debt but haven't woken up to the fact yet.
And same as in America, the pollies here (who live filthy rich lifestyles at taxpayers' expense) haven't got the faintest idea about how the common folk live.
@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
20 May 08
I personally think we're headed for a bad, bad time. We're not officially in a recession but there are economists saying we are. I'm not so sure we can avoid a depression the way things are going. We're pouring billion every month into the "war on terror" and Bush will invade Iran before the end of the year--my son's friend in the army says he's been ferrying troops over to Iran's border for weeks now.
I stay out of debt and squeeze my pennies, for all the good it'll do me. And if they don't think we're in a recession, they should go ask the average Joe Blow, he'll give them an earful!



