Troops "Warned" About Politics
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
June 14, 2008 12:32am CST
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs recently wrote an unusual letter to all our troops "reminding" them that they're not allowed to participate in political debate. I understand this is nothing new but for some reason I think this just doesn't seem right. It's always said that military members and their families tend to vote Republican but I've been hearing recently that this isn't necessarily so today, at least not in the numbers it used to be. I think this letter tends to reinforce that opinion.
I'd like to hear of military families here. What do you think about this "reminder"? Does it smell a bit of a right-wing conspiracy, an attempt to keep the fact that the troops who have been sent into harm's way by George W. Bush aren't as supportive of Bush's party as they may wish them to be? Just asking...what do you guys think? I think if anyone has the right to speak their mind whenever they feel like it, it's our troops, and I believe that no matter what they happen to think, whether they agree with me or are of a totally opposite opinion from mine.
Annie
2 people like this
3 responses
@Zergonipal (807)
• Poland
14 Jun 08
Everyone have a right to have his/hers own opinion and everyone have right of free speach. I think that troops aren't any diffrence here.
3 people like this
@calcynic (433)
• United States
14 Jun 08
This is just one more example of the insidious nature of this stinking war. Every single piece of information managed by our fearless leader. No cameras at Dover AFB, where the flag draped coffins are off-loaded. All reporters imbedded so the news can be managed down to the last semicolon.
There is a law preventing federal employees from electioneering at work or on gov't property, as I was subject to it when I worked for the Navy, but that didn't apply to political discussions...electioneering isn't a right; the free exchange of ideas is.
We were never reprimanded in Nam for arguing politics or even the pros and cons of the war itself. We would get yelled at by lifers for not being gung ho when we talked to a reporter, but nothing would come of it. If you gave an honest, negative opinion of our involvement, it would get printed...except in Stars and Stripes.
What's happening here is a morale crusher...I know we felt like the government owned us lock stock and barrel, to be stripped of the basic right of a U.S.citizen would have been a bridge too far.
The press was allowed to freelance Vietnam, at their own risk, and they did an excellent job covering it. They brought it into our living rooms and we, as a country slowly, but surely began to get it. Bush/Cheney don't want everybody to get it...it's to FUBAR to let us see thru the smoke and mirrors.
2 people like this
@ElicBxn (64172)
• United States
14 Jun 08
My dad worked for a not for profit that was associated with the government of Texas and he said that we (while in his household) could not participate in politics because he had to work with whoever won. Alianating some group just wasn't to be done so long as he was putting the roof over our heads.
Since I've been out, I have, but maybe less than some might prefer.
2 people like this




