Bush Passes the Buck on Climate Change
By anniepa
@anniepa (27955)
United States
July 11, 2008 4:57pm CST
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration on Friday rejected regulating greenhouse gases blamed for global warming, saying it would cause too many job losses.
In a 588-page federal notice, the Environmental Protection Agency made no finding on whether global warming poses a threat to people's health, reversing an earlier conclusion at the insistence of the White House and officially kicking any decision on a solution to the next president and Congress.
Environmentalists criticized the move, while the U.S. Chamber of Commerce worried it left open the door for mandatory reductions.
Read more from this article here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25641109/
Again it appears that this President and Administration are above the law no matter what. If they disagree with the Supreme Court, they sidestep the ruling, if Bush disagrees with a bill passed by Congress, he adds a signing statement concerning the parts he doesn't like, if a current or former member of the Administration is subpoenaed, he or she simply doesn't show up. If they don't like a CDC report they black out the part they don't like. Is anyone else as anxious as I am for this gang to go back to Texas to clear brush?
Annie
1 person likes this
8 responses
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
12 Jul 08
People can't even come to a consensus on what causes global warming. At this point there is nothing I see that comes close to proving the current global changes aren't part of the natural cycle of this world. Was the Ice Age a result of something people did? I see the global warming as just another natural change and frankly, I don't think we have nearly as much power over this planet's geological changes as people think we do.
I still wonder why people complain about the US so much, but don't care that countries like China and India aren't doing anything about global warming either.
3 people like this
@creative_genius (992)
•
12 Jul 08
I think the US seem to be complained about because of the fact that all of your vehicles seem huge compared to the cars in other countries. This is just what I hear from others- not sure if it is true.
@tigertang (1749)
• Singapore
12 Jul 08
How do you tell countries like China and India that they are not allowed to have things like cars, when the average American has been driving them for years on end and these days, it's the Chinese and Indians who are providing the necessary tools to keep the Americans able to drive their cars?
When you look at things this way, environmentalism starts to sound like a form of racism. USA and the developed world were perfectly OK with driving cars and having factories. Suddenly countries like China and India start rising and we get all upset because Chinese and Indians who are getting richer start doing the things that Americans and other nationalities have done for years.
However, I don't think life is that easy. If only we could just dismiss environmentalist as a bunch of knee Jerk liberals out to keep the third world poor! Unfortunately, global warming and environmental degradation are pretty much a fact of life and although the scientist may not agree on everything, caring for the global eco-system is not something you can dismiss as the preserve of a few geeks.
So what can we do? Well, it would be a help if the richest and strongest nation on the planet lead the way and showed the world how you can be prosperous and still have a good quality of life through having a good environment. The richest nation on earth has shown the capability of creating more innovation than any other nation on the planet and can create innovation to create prosperity and keep the environment clean (something which could be sold to the Chinese and Indians, thus reducing grumbles about trade surplus's). Unfortunately, the leader of the free world feels no such obligation other than to lecture the rest of the world about the environment, human rights and so on while he encourages his government to violate the mentioned items.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
12 Jul 08
Creative Genius, it is true. Too many Americans are driving massive gas guzzling cars. Some do it because they have large families, some because they transport large furntiture and materials, others do it just because they like having big cars. I drive a little Mazda Protege and my wife drives a Toyota Yaris as we see no need to drive oversized and overpriced vehicles.
Tigertang, nobody is blaming China or India for driving cars or anything of the sort. That's why I brought it up. It's funny that you pointed out we are the richest country in the world since people are so focused on this recession that they truly believe us to be poor. Just so you know China is the 4th richest country in the world. I don't see the US government lecturing anyone on the environment. We know where we stand on environmental issues. It's well documented and any country as large and heavily populated as the US is going to have more emissions and such than a country like Belgium.
2 people like this
@kenzie45230 (3560)
• United States
12 Jul 08
Since so many scientists disagree about global warming and greenhouse gasses, I'm glad he stopped this one.
2 people like this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
12 Jul 08
The environmentalist have so many different groups and each one has an ax to grind. They come together when it suits them. If you study the environmental laws you will find that when a group sues and wins they get attorney fees. Many of these "environmentalist" are lawyers who are looking to make a living. They get a law passed requiring more wind power and then turn around and sue the state or Utilities for putting up wind farms. Senator Kennedy and Kerry demand that we use more expensive wind power and then pressure other Senators to ban wind power off the coast of their favorite sailing spots. The environmentalist are like many liberals and all they can do is complain and demand more money for their projects and try to stop progress. In Northern Wisconsin they want more land set aside for public land so they can come up and ride their bikes and use the walking trails, paid for by the gas tax, and don't care that they are bankrupting the communities by removing land from logging and other commercial uses. right now over 1/3 of northern Wisconsin is owned by the state, federal or county governments and pay no taxes. With fewer jobs people can't afford the taxes and are forced from their homes. When will it end?
2 people like this
@MrNiceGuy (4139)
• United States
12 Jul 08
He was right to do this.
You know who else did stuff like this (passing on Kyoto for the exact same reason)? Bill Clinton. Did he get sh1t for it? No.
hmm
2 people like this
@LovesTravel (303)
• United States
12 Jul 08
Bush has long made it clear that he prefers the interests of Big Oil and Big Money to those of the law, the people, the climate, or the peace. This is just one more blemish on his abysmal record. Thank goodness his time in office is nearly over. Sometimes the people get what they deserve in their leaders. If the people of the United States deserved Bush, then we have really done some terrible things to muck with our collective karma.
1 person likes this

@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
13 Jul 08
He has grown the economy, reduced taxes for everyone who pays taxes, increased tax revenue, created jobs, prevented terrorist attacks since 9/11. He is fighting and winning a war with out the mass arrest of US Citizens(like FDR), and he is doing this with a hostile press and he does not have to have them arrested (like Lincoln, Wilson and FDR). You hear a few people complaining but you do not see riots and mass protests against him or his policies (like Johnson). Even the Polar Bear Heard has increased in size to 25,000 (up from about 12,000 in the 70's and 80's) during his administration.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
14 Jul 08
That's impossible Bob. We all know that Bush has done nothing but attack Iraq. He didn't create the Department of Homeland Security and he certainly didn't fix airport security. Nope. No way. Airports don't have any increased security to prevent the same thing from happening again and these Sky Marshalls, who have already stopped some attacks, are a myth! He attacked Iraq and that's IT! How dare you claim that in his 8 years he did anything but attack Iraq?
1 person likes this
@LovesTravel (303)
• United States
12 Jul 08
P.S.: The Bush Administration is a failed presidency.
1 person likes this

@steeltownfan5828 (252)
• United States
12 Jul 08
I think I've made it pretty clear how I feel about the global warming myth. There's not nearly a strong enough case that global warming might be a threat to warrant spending the money to monitor it.
2 people like this
@teison2 (5921)
• Norway
11 Jul 08
It does not surprise me at all, but it makes me very sad and upset. It really odes not matter that most other nations go together to make things better if Bush just goes ahead doing whatever he wants. His responisbility is huge, and I wonder what the world will think of him in retrospect. I pray he does not manage to ruin everything for the rest of us, and I hope that the next US election will be a fair one, and that someone with more solidarity and brains win. I am so fed up with Bush ruining things for the rest of us.
1 person likes this
@creative_genius (992)
•
12 Jul 08
Is anyone surprised? I would say he has his own priorities and global warming is not one of them.






