Which one of that would you prefer?

Freedom, because there is no such thing as complete safety. People are killed in their own homes everyday here in the U.S.. The degree of safety is about all you can control so yes i had rather have freedom to do as i choose, of course if i had ever lived in a war zone i might think differently!

I believe that safety is much more important. What good is freedom if you have to live in fear?

I would rather have reedom. I can keep myself safe, but I could not bare liing a goernment-made "safe" life without freedom. You should read a book by Margret Atwood called The Handmaid's Tale, which tells a story of what happens when there is safety, but no freedom. I am currently reading a book called Love IN A Torn Land, by Jean Sasson, about a Kurdish woman in Iraq, married to a Peshmerga. It's a fantastic book, and what she and her husband went through was amazig!!! I have a Kurdish friend here in my hometown in Canada, who told me a lot o stories about his escape from Iraq.

I choose both freedom and safety. But if i only have one choice, i choose safety. Nothing is more important than safety.