Black Window Sentence!!!!

Whether these two women should have been sentenced would depend on what their real plan was. If they were really investing in homeless men to cover their care while they lived while thinking that, due to age and health, they would probably die and break the bank, then, all that they were guilty of was making a benevolent investment with a perk. However, if they were the ones who were behind the murders--either mowing the men down themselves or else having someone else to--they're guilty of murder and their sentences were very just. If they weren't guilty, they were probably thinking that they would actually be helping some unfortunate men who needed medical care while, also, believing that at least some of them wouldn't be around that long, which would bring in more money for both them and for the care of these men. There are two ways of looking at the story. You don't sentence someone to life without parole (or even to ANY time in prison) for simply engaging in a get-rich-quick scheme that involved no intentional harm to these men and would even end up helping many of them. After all, it doesn't seem as if too many agencies are doing that much in the way of helping them when it comes to things like medical care. This case needs to be looked at to see whether or not there was ever any premeditated murder that was brought about by these women.

killing anyone is generally bad, but for money is worse. However, it is probably right up there in the top two reasons people do it along with love/hate/jealousy, you know, emotions. I am curious though, how much would they have to gain by robbing someone who is homeless? Doesn't really seem to be like a profitable endeavor if you ask me.