Who wins?- Cancer Vs VHI (AIDS)
By Jose92
@Jose92 (18)
Portugal
July 25, 2008 12:25pm CST
HI there this is the 2nd thread in my "who wins" series. Last one was about whowould win: pirates or ninjas. THe ninjas took over pirates easily.
Now we take this to a higher level. this two contesters are not as easy to defend as the childish and obvious thread about ninjas and pirates:p.
it is possible that you may have to know some science to defend this discussion and your point of view.
think well about your arguments and lets see who wins!!!
1 response
@heartonfire (4119)
• Denmark
25 Jul 08
Lol, win?...win what?win how?... i think i should know the way your other topic on who wins developped ,in order to make a point in this one..but... what kind of arguments should we bring?positive?negative?... i don't understand the question
@Jose92 (18)
• Portugal
25 Jul 08
Ok i understand your confusion.
I learned this from my debating skills class in college, the point is to cativate people to use arguments to make constructive responses.
The point here is for you to say wich one you think is best in what it does.
in this thread we are talking about nasty 2 nasty vírus. BUt you can say that one is more dangerous or nasty than the other, like: more painfull, kills faster, etc.
IT sure is more dificult to defend than who is more deadly, pirates or ninjas for example; but the point is to put the arguments standarts higher.
Say that one is more dangerous thatn the other and say why.
thats the point!
