Why are there 2 Women's Titles?

United States
July 26, 2008 3:09pm CST
They don't do enough with the one they have now. In my opinion, sure keep the Diva's Title but remove the Official Championship Title. I understand that they are introducing more women that have great technical ability, but really are those the ones that are really wearing the gold? One chick kick does not a champion make.
1 person likes this
3 responses
@bumba1988 (1220)
• India
27 Jul 08
Well,it is a good idea as there must be equal number of titles in both Raw and Smackdown.With cuiserweight title going into oblivion,it is a good title to have and why also Smackdown girls cannot have a championship of their own?
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Aug 08
I like the idea of each brand having their own female champ. Well done!
@babostwick (2036)
• United States
27 Jul 08
The Diva Title looks really ugly. I'd rather they just have one woman's title and that be the original one. It makes it seem like it is getting a bit too easy to be champion. I guess it's there way of saying that maybe they're not good enough to hold the Woman's Title so here's this belt for you. I don't know why but I quite honestly don't like that. The Woman's Title could have been used and defended everywhere.
1 person likes this
• United States
27 Jul 08
Fair enough. I agree that title does need a redesign.
@mitija (82)
• United States
26 Jul 08
They barely have enough women who can wrestle to have one belt much less two. The Diva's belt has got to go.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Jul 08
I like the idea of the Diva belt. The main one should go.