Wal-Mart opposes OBAMA!

United States
August 1, 2008 6:58am CST
Yes, it is true. One of the biggest, most profitable corporations in America is against Obama. Wal-Mart is warning managers and employees that under an Obama administration rules would be changed so as to make it easier for companies to be unionized. Wal-Mart fears that. Read about it here. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121755649066303381.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news I say Wal-Mart's fears are justified that Obama would make it easier for unions to get a foothold, by why fear the union? Good management can exist with a union. I've seen it happen. It does take exceptionally good management. Do Wal-Mart executives think their management team just is not up to the challenge? What do you say?
2 people like this
6 responses
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
1 Aug 08
I am strongly anti-union and think they cause way more problems then they solve. Not only that, they are also bastions of socialism. After having been in the position of having to take part in voting a union out, and seen the tactics that they use including damaged vehicles and threats, I think unions should be outlawed because they are made up of outlaws.
2 people like this
• United States
1 Aug 08
People who can not advance themselves through merit or by making a more valuable contribution do love unions. This is the same mindset that loves socialism. Union leaders are just like politicians. So, the long story short is that you are right. LOL... did I tell you my wife is a shop steward? Yes, it is true. But don't worry she knows the problems with unions better than us. She ran for office to get rid of the shop steward they had. Now, my wife catches crap from the union because she gets problems solved with the boss without any paper work or gievances being filed. There's a problem? They they work it out immediately. Saves time and more work gets done. Everyone's happy about this except the union higher ups. They want documentation to prove management is a bunch of meanies instead of hard working people just trying to get a job done, too.
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Aug 08
In the case of General Motors, which is losing money hand over fist, the union and management's incompetance at dealing with the union absolutely is what is destroying the company. Which is sad, as my 2004 Chevy Impala is an excellant car that had a good price. I'd gladly buy another but I don't expect this one to wear out anytime soon.
• Alexandria, Virginia
2 Aug 08
gm is going broke not because of unions but the failure to aggressive market hybrid cars
1 person likes this
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
1 Aug 08
I am not against unions, but I don't think union are not always the answer. From what I understand from people I know who work at WalMart, WalMart isn't anti-union.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Aug 08
I am a former stockholder of Wal-Mart. My mother worked at Wal-Mart for many years, and I follow the business news. This experience tells me that Wal-Mart is very anti-union. Even to the point Wal-Mart is strongly suspected of closing individual stores that had the potential of forming a union. Yes, this is against the law, but Wal-Mart always gave another reason for closing the store.
@sedel1027 (17846)
• Cupertino, California
1 Aug 08
I have never worked there. I doubt unions would solve any problem with Wal-Mart, they seem to create more problems than to solve them. Around here Wal-mart pays what is a fair wage (compared to other business in the area) and they even pay health insurance for the part times. If Wal-mart is unionized, then they would have to unionize Target and other large "discount" stores.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Aug 08
I agree unions would not solve any problems at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart actually is one of the best run companies there is.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
1 Aug 08
My first job was at Wal-Mart, and after college I became a manager, so I think I can comment. The fear of unions is that it would make Wal-Mart less competitive through becoming less flexible. With unions there are set in stone job description, at Wal-Mart there are no such thing as a set in stone job description. Look at Wal-Mart's competions and you will see companies that are not unionized either. Target would love nothing better than to see Wal-Mart become unionized. The closest competator to Wal-Mart that is unionized is Krogers.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Aug 08
Sounds to me like you are completely on the money. I'm not aware of any company becoming more profitable after a union.
1 person likes this
@laglen (19759)
• United States
1 Aug 08
I am not against unions (born and raised in Michigan), I believe they have their uses. But what concerns me about them, is the pressure, cost, and strong arming. Does Walmart management have what it takes? Heck no! Not to mention, a percentage of their employees will be easy prey. I really think that the federal government needs to stay out of big business.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Aug 08
Without a doubt, unions are an absolute necessity. Not that all companies should have a union, they shouldn't. However, all companies should know that their employees could form a union if they wanted. As to Wal-Mart, my mother worked at one for something like 15 years. She loved it, but it was her first job. She did not have anything to which to compare that experience. I told her some of the things she related to me about her job broke labor law and she did not believe me, until finally she found another job closer to home. After that, seeing how other companies operated, she decided not to ever work for Wal-Mart again. BTW: I am not anti-union. My wife is a shop steward. As an independent trucker I had numerous conversations with Teamsters and use to deliever to a Ford plant and interacted with UAW members. I have seen the good and the bad of unions.
• Alexandria, Virginia
2 Aug 08
we need to send a message to walmart let us all stop shopping there!!!!!
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Aug 08
Jeesh... I can't stop shopping there. Every place else near here is more expensive.
@stoa2008 (62)
• United States
2 Aug 08
I have no problem with unions, as long as they aren't government-sponsored and especially as long as employees aren't *mandated* to join one. Whenever someone is forced to do something, that's a good indication that they are being taken advantage of. And for all the complaints people have about big corporations, I have just as many about big labor and big government.
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Aug 08
I actually have more complaints about big government than anything else. No one kills more innocent people than big government.