Publishing house or self published?

United States
August 1, 2008 9:19pm CST
Which would you choose and why? I always thought I would send my book in and get it published through a house, but the more I read about it, the more I protest. Yes, I want the best book out I can get, but in the end I want it to be my book. Not some editor's idea of the perfect best seller. Yes, they may have made more best sellers than I have, but still.... I have read excerpts from both Dean Koontz and Stephen King where publishers had them change book titles and insist they stick to a certain type of book. That we consumers are too wishy washy and if they were to switch from writing about dogs, then we wouldn't read their stuff. I am eternally grateful that they didn't listen and wrote what was in their hearts and in their heads. I want my title and I want the book the way I wrote it. It is mine darn it. So... I guess I am self publishing... Now to figure out how to do that and what the best way to go about it is. I just always had visions of having my book go to auction and getting high bids from different publishing houses until I make more than I thought possible. Then again... I don't think I would get royalties for that, so it is a trade off isn't it? I can have one big check or I can have checks in the mail for the rest of my life.... hmmmmm. I like the thought of checks in the mail for life. That would make me feel more rich to get more checks than bills. I have a lot to think about before I finish this manuscript.
1 person likes this
4 responses
• Philippines
2 Aug 08
Darn! I've never given that issue a thought yet. I've been wanting to have my "little novel" published and I wasn't even thinking about tapping a publisher house's help or doing it myself. I mean, the former would be an edge than the latter because I know nothing about publishing at all. But nevertheless, I can read about it and give it a shot, right? Shucks! I never even finished my book yet and now there's one more thing that I'll have to worry about. Yeah, I agree. I wouldn't want anybody to change my title or decide how I write and what I should write. I think I'll study about self-publishing my work... Thank you very much for this discussion. It's a big help. God bless you and that book of yours. I'm hoping to read it one day. :)
• United States
2 Aug 08
lol! Only if you are a tweenie book reader. My book is targeting 10-14 year olds. It is history based fiction so they get some learning in when reading about this adventure. I believe wholeheartedly it will be a great hit.
• United States
3 Aug 08
Hey, I won't talk anyone out of a potential sale.
• Philippines
2 Aug 08
Well, I have a 9 year old niece, I can buy the book for her and I always read all the books I give to my nieces first before letting them into it (*wink)...
@sunnflr (2767)
• United States
2 Aug 08
I have a few books on lulu.com a self publishing site. One is a book of poems, I have a version with pics and one without, then I have two childrens activity books. I went with self publishing because they aren't something a real publisher would like. Or I don't believe they would anyway. If I ever write a real book I'd probably try to get it publised with a real place first and if it didn't work then do it myself.
• United States
2 Aug 08
You get paid from Lulu every sale? I am interested in that. I guess I better go read about it. Thanks for the site information.
1 person likes this
@sunnflr (2767)
• United States
2 Aug 08
Yes you set the price you want and lulu gets a comission. It's all laid out for you and very easy to do. You can even make eBooks if you choose.
• United States
3 Aug 08
I will be keeping this site in mind. I have it bookmarked and everything. Thanks for the help.
@1grnthmb (2055)
• United States
4 Aug 08
I am really not sure which would be the best for getting the book out there. I have seen several authors who have used independent publishing houses (Self Published) and not the big publishing houses. If you intended to write various types of books I would stick with the independent publisher but the draw back there is you have to do all of the promoting yourself. While the big publishers will promote for you. I would also think it best to get paid for each book that sells rather then one large check. Often authors get screwed if they write a hit book that they only got paid ten thousand dollars for writing it. It then gets made into a movie and sells many more books. The only one making the money is the publisher.
@mcat19 (1357)
• United States
3 Aug 08
You will need an editor whatever way you chose to go. You won't have to change anything you don't want to. Very few writers get rich writing. I'd love my granddaughter to read your book. She loves historical books. Good luck with what ever you choose.
• United States
3 Aug 08
Yes, I suppose having an editor is wise. I used to think that my language skills were good, but now I am not so sure. I tend to use incomplete sentences and the like. I guess it has been too many years out of school to be that confident. I had kids, so now my brain is rewired. lol