Is commitment also a ticket to being physically intimate to the other?

August 7, 2008 10:54am CST
this question kind of pops into my head at times... let's say that if you're in a relationship, is being a "bf and gf" entitles us to be intimate with each other? like... does it give us the privilege to do certain activities and/or, more or less, does it gives us the "right" to do so? or is it more of a decision? and.... if you choose not to do those things like kissing and etc, is that being unfair to your boyfriend/girlfriend? please give me your opinion on this :-)
3 responses
• United States
11 Aug 08
No one has the RIGHT to intimacy with you. If they see it as a right rather than a privilege, then that is the wrong person for you. If they are manipulative about intimacy, then they are manipulative, controlling and domineering about other things as well. If someone feels it's a*right* then that's an automatic red flag.
11 Aug 08
:-). Yes, that really makes sense..... thank you! :-D
• United States
7 Aug 08
I gotta be frank on this one. Physical intimacy plays a huge role in relationships. It helps two individuals who have a commitment to notice that they are more than "just friends". It is sometimes the physical intimacy that creates the phycological situation in which you feel completely committed to that person that is willing to do "things" that he/she wont do with any other individual.
8 Aug 08
ahh... i see :-) that makes sense... thank you!. when i think of it, when you are in a relationship, people are i guess drawn to physical intimacy... rarely do i find couples that don't engage themselves in any forms of physical intimacy to the other
• United States
7 Aug 08
Being in a committed relationship puts you under no obligation to do anything you do not want to do. If you do not want to kiss or go further, than you should be clear with your significant other about your feelings upfront, so he/she is not surprised later. If they don't want to deal with that, it's their loss. On the other side, you technically don't have to be in a relationship to be intimate with another person. I prefer being in a relationship for intimacy myself, but that's a personal preference on my part. The bottom line is that it is up to each individual, in OR out of a relationship, to decided what they are comfortable with. As long as you're not hurting anyone and you're staying true to yourself, that's what's most important - not labels.
8 Aug 08
thanks for your opinion :-). coz i know a certain couple who were committed, but the guy broke up with the girl because she is not willing to be intimate with him. it kinda surprised me how it is such a big deal to him.. i guess it depends upon the person... anyways, thanks :-)