wwf or wwe ?

till today i can say wwf was far more better and interesting dan wwe..waf was with greater entertainment level dan wwe..

WWF was a great time because it was new and the biggest because of wrestler of name. WWE is good aswell , but there is one problem with WWE ... the story line with the TAG TEAM matches ... they are doing hardly anything with it because is horroribly and irritating.The time of WWF the tag teams was something big next to the other titles. now is some belt you take extra if they are telling you to fight him someone else like in the situation with BATISTA and CENA ... but what about THE HARDY'S ... CHRISTIAN and EDGE ( ok christian is in TNA ) .... the wwf time with ANIMAL etc... they really need to fix that !!!

Bit too early to say to be honest. Give it another 10 or so years, I'll have a clearer opinion. The WWF era had the biggest start that any organisation could ever had wish for at the time: Hulk Hogan. From there, you had Randy Savage, Ultimate Warrior, Shawn Michaels, Brett Hart, The Rock, The Undertaker, Steve Austin, Triple H, D-X! Not to mention the classic array of Tag Teams!

For me I would say the WWF era was better. The time of WWE has not provided me with enough entertainment. Or should I say the level of entertainment that I got when the name was WWF.