Poking The Bear's Eye Is Not The Smartest Thing!

@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
August 16, 2008 1:14pm CST
Mikheil Saakashvili President of Georgia thought he could get away with a lightning coup breakaway province of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Instead Vladimir Putin took the opportunity to kick the Georgian army out of Abkhazia, as well, to bomb Tbilisi and to seize Gori within 48 hours. Saakashvili's blunder probably means permanent loss of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Simply stated Georgia started this fight, Russia finished it. A lesson from the world do not poke the bear in the eye.
2 people like this
5 responses
@evanslf (484)
16 Aug 08
I suspect that Russia, or at least its proxies in South Ossetia did something to provoke Saakashvili to take the action that he took. That said, Saakashvili was very unwise to go into South Ossetia with his tanks hoping that Russia would do nothing - perhaps he thought, mistakenly, that the US would then come to his aid. Big mistake. But Russia have to be careful now not to overplay their hand, they need at the very least to withdraw their forces back to the S. Ossetia and Abkazian borders. Then, with international monitors, Russia may well get what it seeks by having referendums in these two breakaway regions that will likely vote to join Russia. Bad leadership by Saakashvili - he has almost certainly lost the two provinces by his ill-considered actions.
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
16 Aug 08
Saakashvili over played his hand, and Putin called his bluff.
1 person likes this
• United States
17 Aug 08
When you put it that way, Russia did the smart, right, thing. So, there are two sides to everything.
2 people like this
@urbandekay (18278)
26 Aug 08
Bush was even more stupid, if that is possible, than he usually is, in his hypocritical posturing about Russian aggression. Russia went in because Georgia had moved into South Ossetia and had committed atrocities. Bushes rhetoric is laughable. If, the West supported Georgia breaking away from Russia they should support the Ossetian people's struggle for independence. Instead Bush is just using it as an excuse to make trouble and try in typical American fashion to demonize Russia. Well, we in Europe should be crying for freedom for South Ossetia and telling Bush to keep his mouth shut, unless he can raise his thinking above that of the average window licker. But Georgia's democracy is no better than Americas own hardly deserving the name of democracy. Bush's posturing is laughable from a European perspective, when he spouts off about Russia, whilst heading a hugely aggressive stance elsewhere. Just because US supported the independence of Georgia, for their own ends, doesn't mean they are right. Nor does US hatred of Russia mean they are wrong. And to be honest, who trust America, they have proved themselves treacherous. Shooting a British newsman (Not a friendly fire accident but a war crime) and then refusing access to British Justice. Lets have an end to US moral stances till they clean up their act and put there own house in order. all the best urban
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
17 Aug 08
They could have done better by negotiating a peaceful separation. War is a last resort. I do not understand these politics, but there are peaceful means to get the same ends and that does not get the Russians mad at them. They do not have embassies and consulates or the art of diplomacy for nothing. Oh I have no idea whether Sasskashvili tried the diplomatic way at first If he did not, then it is his fault that Russia rose against Georgia.
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
16 Aug 08
In order for it to have been a coup, the regions would have to have been part of Russia. The internationally and U.N recognized borders put them as part of Georgia. It was probably more like Georgia trying to stop a coup, a rebellion and a cesesion.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
17 Aug 08
Abkhazia and South Ossestia has been trying to brake away from Georgia since the 90's and join Russia. All Abkhazia and South Ossestia was trying do not is the same thing the 11 southern state did in 1860.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
17 Aug 08
And in 1860 Lincoln said that was illegal and fought a civil war over it. How would we have felt if Mexico decided to invade the Union in a war that was none of their business?
1 person likes this