a choice

hi To be honest, in such a case i'll take few minitues off, close my eyes and think following things: 1. If i kill myself now, my family will be ruined. 2. I may die right now naturally, then I wouldn't get a chance to think over my family. 3. If i agree to kill the teenager how will that affect me? After considering these points i'll go and kill the teenager. because 1. I know I'm not a criminal, and so not harmful to the society and I have to be responsible to my family as well. 2. I don't know that the teenager isn't a criminal or there is no surity that he won't be so in the future. If he becomes a criminal, then my action will be held responsible. Further since he is teenager, he isn't responsible to maiantain a family. 3. So I'll kill him and won't repent because i have come tothe conclusion that I have eradicated not a teenager but a possibility which may affect society in future at the cost of proven non criminal (myself).

I would not take my own life, I have a family to take care of and that is the utmost importance to me. It might sound selfish, but I want to see my babygirl grow up, and see her daddy walk her down the aisle. Obviously its survival first, and saving second, unless its the life of my daughter or my fiance. I would defiantly lay down on my life for either of them without thought.

I could never make a concious decision that would result in orphaning my children. I wouldn't want to kill either, but if it was a matter of survival, I would probably take the teenager's life...but I would probably never be able to forgive myself, either - unless said person was threatening me and that's why I killed him. If he was putting me in mortal danger through his actions, I wouldn't feel so bad about taking him out. This reminds me of all that stuff in The Dark Knight - sad, having to choose when the potential victims aren't threatening each other.