Electing Veeps?
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
August 21, 2008 8:36pm CST
At this point of every presidential election season the voters' attention turns to running mates. The apparent nominees are set, the campaign strategies are well underweigh and the major issues have hit center stage. Nominees usually pick a running mate who will fill some kind of weakness they are experiencing in the big race. In that respect, this election is no different. The other major function of the VP is, traditionally, he or she becomes the heir apparent for the big chair 4-8 years later.
Running mates often bring in voters from geographic or demographic areas unreachable my the frontrunner. Sometimes they convince single issue voters that putting themselves in the little chair in the oval office is better than the other party's candidate in the big chair.
Both Obama and McCain are looking for that special someone who will bring something to the table they are unable to fill themselves. What is different this year is that "something".
What is it that niether candidate seems to be able to do that they are hoping their VP choice will bring to the table?
An energized base!
Obama started out with as energized a base as you can hope for. He had fans only dreamed of by Boy Bands and Hair Bands alike. Women swooned, men stood in wondering awe... Now they seem to be wondering what happened.
McCain had the opposite problem. When he emerged as the apparent nominee, the Republicans were left scratching their heads. Momentum did get rolling after Obama clinched the Democrat nomination. He became the poster child in a "Ok, McCain isn't all we dreamed of, but he's better than Obama" campaign, that seems to have moved him up from "gag me til I die" to "ok, I can choke him down" status. Which, in past elections wouldn't have amounted to much, but it has put McCain ahead of Obama by as much as 5 points.
This search for VP doesn't seem so much about geography, demographics or anything else so mundane. What the two hope their running mate do that they can't do for themselves, is win the White House.
Yes folks, we're no longer electing a President this year, we're electing a Vice President. The term "co-president" was coined for the Clintons, but whether the winner has a D or an R after their name, this election is going to turn on one decision... The Vice President.
3 people like this
2 responses
@bubblyapple (2653)
• Philippines
22 Aug 08
I just have to wonder why each presidential candidate's party has to help them choose. Why do they have to consider what the majority of the party members have to say? I know, it's politics and you have to listen to your party mates and all that. But come to think of it. It would be you who have to deal with the VP candidate all the time, so shouldn't you at least have the right to choose who you want to spend the next few months with on the campaign trail?
I heard in one of McCain's speeches that he would choose a VP candidate who shares the same values and hopes as he does. And I believe that is a very good criteria. If you are going to be running mates, you really have to have the same passion on the same things. It would be very hypocritical of them if not.
I haven't heard Obama say anything about what criteria he is using to be able to choose his running mate for the November elections. But I do observe that in the Democratic Party, there is so much "politicking" going on. Some supporters are even threatening not to support the party anymore if their "bet" is not the one who is chosen.
Well I guess, that's really how politics goes. You just can't help but step back and say "What a jungle it is out there!".
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
22 Aug 08
Because they are the party's nominees.
1 person likes this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
22 Aug 08
I keep hoping the delay in announcing Obama's choice is to give someone time to get down on their knees and beg Al Gore to take on the VP position again. That would be energizing and it would add experience and stature. How can you argue with the qualifications of an X-VP who is a Nobel laureate? (LOL with my tongue in my cheek)
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
22 Aug 08
Al Gore invented the text messaged VP announcement.



