Do children need two parents?
By BubblyIan
@BubblyIan (750)
September 11, 2008 5:23pm CST
For my first discussion I thought I would start with a less controversial topic - later ones I can stir things.
Something that has always baffled me about the absurd system in the UK - 'winner takes all' 100% of the benefits and tax credits associated with having a child go to one parent, normally the mother! Even if the parents share care equally, only one of them gets 100% of the money!
Clearly the UK government believes that only one parent is necessary for bringing up children.
However, all the evidence indicates that children do significantly better with both parents around - so what do you think? Obviously there are some good single parents, but disproprotionately their children do worse at school, are more likely to end up in prison, become addicted to drugs, alcohol, teenage pregnancy and/or mental illness.
2 people like this
7 responses
@srhelmer (7047)
• Beaver Dam, Wisconsin
12 Sep 08
Obviously, kids don't necessarily need two parents; plenty are raised by only a mom or only a dad. But, I do think it helps. Not just the kids either. I don't think I could stay sane if I didn't have my wife to take our daughter out on girls only shopping trips or something, giving me some time to myself.
@Anne18 (11029)
•
12 Sep 08
I'm very glad that you said some children are raised only by a mom or" only a dad".
As a lot of people only think about single mums and not single dads.
There are a lot of single dads out there bringing children up on there own and doing just as well as the single mums and these dads sometimes get pushed to the side as a lot of people only think about single mums.
1 person likes this
@BubblyIan (750)
•
12 Sep 08
Exactly! But after separation both parents should remain equally important and equally involved in their children's lives. it is a criminal shame that we have a 'winner takes all' system in the UK, which means that one parent normally the mother ends up as primary carer with all the benefits and tax credits the other parent normally the father ends up with very little contact and is persecuted by the father's tax.
When divorcing it is normal to split everything equally, why not time with the children too?
@BubblyIan (750)
•
12 Sep 08
Of course this is a factor. This is why it makes no sense for the UK government to continue to presume that the mother is automatically the better parent and primary carer 'just because she is female' it obviously depends on the people concerned.
@samtaylorskykierajen (7976)
• Canada
12 Sep 08
I have never heard of this and agree it is a ridiculous law , does your goverment think that only one parent is capable of raising children ? Children do much better with two parents . They don't need two parents to survive but a two parent family will have a much easier job raising their children and there will be less stress on the child in a two parent household .
@BubblyIan (750)
•
12 Sep 08
Well that is my presumption as all the laws and rights concerning children are vested in one parent, normally the mother, particularly if the parents are unmarried. it is an absurd system and is fundamentally undermining the future for our children. it is not surprising to me that Britain was recently identified as the worst country in the western world for bringing up children.
@cecelgay (563)
• Philippines
12 Sep 08
You're right that it is much better that children has two parents, this is a normal family life but if the parents are not getting along with i should say that it is better to have one parent than having both while seeing them almost everyday fighting, having both parents beside is not an assurance that children will not be a failure, there are children who grow having separated parents who's successful, the only thing there is that parents need to give the proper love and attention to his kids even they live apart, We just need children to understand why mommy and daddy cant be together. Failure of our children will depend on how we raise and guide them, also it depends on how the children think...
@BubblyIan (750)
•
12 Sep 08
Agreed - and you raise another interesting point - the biggest damage to a child is the animosity between the parents. I see this in court battles over divorce and custody (known as residence in UK). The longer these battles go on the worse the children suffer. Separating parents need to consider the effect on the child of their actions. The worst effect is known as parental alienation syndrome - where the primary carer normally the mother poisons the mind fo the child against the other parent, normally the father. It leads to kids being turned against their fathers and refusing to see them - brainwashed by poisonous mothers - unfortuantely there is rarely any punsihment for this form of child abuse and the UK courts are extremely reluctant to even accept it is happening!
It is also true - failure of our children will depend on how we raise them'. I agree. The most important job we do in this world is bringing up the children - if we do it well they grow up to be law-abiding, decent, honest, self-motivated,w ell balanced members of society. if we do it wrong they end up in prison!
@medney1988 (560)
• United States
12 Sep 08
i think children need two parents. a lot of children however only grow up with one or sometimes none. i'm not saying a child that doesn't grow up with two parents is going to have problems but god intended for us to have two parents. that's why he states that you should be married before children.
@BubblyIan (750)
•
12 Sep 08
Well it takes two to make a baby and it takes two to bring it up properly. In reality, the nature of the parent's legal relationship is of little consequence to a baby that simply wants and needs both aprents around all the time. The issue of marriage is interesting as married couples stay together significantly longer on average than unmarried couples, even when babies are involved. Whether it is because of the commitment given or the difficulty of ending the marriage is not clear, but the evidence suggests that they last longer and hence are better on every score than unmarried couples.
@tparring (106)
• United States
11 Sep 08
I don't think it is necessary for there to be two parents. I grew up in a single parent house hold...and I turned out good. I got a bachelors degree...and I dont get into trouble.
If you think about it...in this day and age, both parents are out working..and they hire baby sitters or something like that. So, in this case there is no parents around to make sure they are doing what they are supposed to be doing.
It is benificial for the child to have both parents around though...but it isnt necessary
@BubblyIan (750)
•
12 Sep 08
Well done - of course - you might be the exception that proves the rule?
The evidence is overwhelming that children brought up by single parents (normally mothers) are significantly more likely to get into trouble and/or do worse at school. Something like 90% of prisoners have little or no contact with their father. It is well known that children from 'deprived' areas do worse at school and are less likely to go to university. Actually - these 'deprived' areas are measured by benefit dependency - single mothers for example are significantly less likely to work - after all why shuld they when the benefit system in the UK takes away 85p of their beneit for every pound that they earn.
You are correct about the problems of two parent families when both parents work - you cannot delegate the job of being a parent to an underqualified person who is doing it for the money. The children suffer that way as well - or even when sent to boarding school.
The best way and what most two parent families do is only one parent works so the other is around most of the time. That is the better way. The best way of course is where there are lots of adults around - aunts, uncles grandparents siblings etc - you should never be outnumbered byc hildren as they become competitive.







