Improving the political process

@clrumfelt (5597)
Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
September 24, 2008 9:37am CST
I think the political process is in a mess because legislation that would help our nation immensely often can't be passed. It won't be passed, not because it is bad legislation, but because bipartisan politics make it bad before passing it on the the president. The buck falls at the desk of the president and if he thinks the tacked on issues would be bad for the nation, if he honors the integrity of his job he will veto the bill even though it contained some good. I wonder if those in Congress who put together the drafts, put so much bad stuff in along with the good either because they don't want a president of the other party to get credit for doing something good for the country, or, perhaps the lobbyists are lining their pockets to an extent they put all the pork they can into the bills. Whatever the problem is, I think one solution would be to give the president the power of a line-item veto. I think it would make Congress focus more intently on the true issues when they put together a bill, and a lot more good things could be done for the USA. What are your thoughts on this? Do you think line-item veto power would put too much power in the hands of the president, or do you think it has the potential to help the checks and balances of the Congressional and Presidential offices work the way it is supposed to?
2 people like this
2 responses
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
25 Sep 08
I think it would be a good idea. The Democratic Congress tacked bad suggestions on the bill so that the president could not pass it. So if there was a bill perhaps to increase the pay of the soldiers or to give them more benefits, and the Democrats did not want Bush to give credit, they would tack on a bill that girls can get abortions without tell their parents, or one that any city that does not allow gay pride parades not get funding. So that bill to help the soldiers will be vetoed because of those evil bills. So a line-item veto would be a good idea and when it becomes law, then no one will think of sneaking an obviously bad law on a good law.
@clrumfelt (5597)
• Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
25 Sep 08
You are right on target. The practice of tacking on stuff to otherwise good bills puts the President and Congress into a gridlock preventing them from helping the USA in so many ways.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40192)
• Canada
18 Feb 09
I read part of the Stimulus bill and they did attach a few things on it, but since it is a Democratic congress and Democratic president, they will probably go through. I sort of think of Obama holding a rubber stamp that says Approved, etc. Thanks for the best response.
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
24 Sep 08
I thought they already had a line item veto. Didn't that go in under Clinton? Whatever, I think it's necessary to have a system of checks and balances, no matter how annoying, it's still the best way to keep things in balance.
1 person likes this
@clrumfelt (5597)
• Tennessee Ridge, Tennessee
24 Sep 08
If the line item veto is available I suppose Congresspeople who want to use tack-ons have to be more crafty with the wording of the bills to make it an ineffective tool.