Bail Out Bill: Yes or No?

@mehale (2200)
United States
October 1, 2008 9:58am CST
I have to say that I really don't think this bail out bill is a good idea or a working solution. I admit that it could cause a great depression to rival the one in the 1930's if they don't pass the bill, but what is to say that it won't make things worse if they do pass the bill? Some things are similar to the depression in the 1930's, but they did not bail out anyone back then, and there is really no proof that this will solve the problem. I think it will cause more inflation, more economic worries, and more problems. Plus the big corporations that are at fault for this problem will not learn anything if the government bails them out. There are bound to be better solutions to our economic problems. For example, lets bring more jobs BACK to America - therefore increasing the amount of money made and spent here at home. This would help everyone. Stop some of the unnecessary imports and start producing more goods here in America. That would bring more jobs back here, and it would also bring more money into flow in our national economy. We could then increase our exports and decrease our imports. Again improving our economy. Let's put the thieves that have started this crisis in prison, and try to really fix our economy for a change, instead of helping the rich get richer and the poor get poorer! Let's have a good clean debate here. Are you for or against the Bail Out bill? State your position and explain your reasons, and lets open the floor to debate this important issue!
1 response
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
2 Oct 08
I'm for it. It's jut a band-aid in terms of the economy but it will give us some time to sort things out. The $700 billion is probably not enough and will definitely not miraculously heal the economy over night. But doing nothing will drive us much faster and probably even further down due to panic reactions and people taking drastic measures in an attempt to save their companies. The bailout will open up lines of credit again, which companies need to operate. While I agree that we need to bring home more jobs, it's nto going to work if the companies go under. Yes, on the surface we seem to reward those who got us into this mess into the first place. Those who handed out sub prime mortgages to anybody and everybody who asked for one. And yes, they should be punished and they in fact are currently under investigation. Still, the trickle down effect of doing nothing will hurt each and everyone of us. Our retirement savings took a hit and it will get worse. Even people with outstanding credit will have trouble getting a loan to even buy a car. Most companies operate on some sort of credit line extended to them by the banks. Without it, a lot of companies, and therefore a lot of jobs would be in trouble. We need time to think about a good solution or to just make heads of this mess. You also have to realize that one way or another the tax payer will pay. The alternative may even be more expensive. The Treasure, FDIC, Federal Reserve.. they already have and will have to continue to pump money into the economy in one way or another. They already participated in the latest deals where folding banks were bought up by others. They'll do what's necessary. And the money they use of course is taxpayers money. But the fallout may be much bigger than $700 billion, and we might not even know the total for a very long time. I like that they attach a lot of restrictions to this bailout bill. More oversight and regulation requirements. Limitations on what executives can gain. No golden parachute... stuff like that. We learned from the great depression, and we will learn from this economic problem. Of course personally, I'd rather have my share of the $700 billion in my hand. At about $2,333 per legal resident/citizen of this country, that would be almost $12k for my family. I could pay off quite some debt with that. I mean let's face it, people either pay off debt, put it into investments or savings, or spend it. Either way, the economy would benefit and the rich wouldn't get richer. We all would have a gain. The downside is that it would not necessarily help those banks which are about to fold... Anyhow, once we have something in place, or decide to do nothing, we'll have to think about preventing this from happening again and put proper regulations and oversight in place. There has to be something to protect us average people..
1 person likes this
@mehale (2200)
• United States
5 Oct 08
You have some very good points there, and I have to admit that it does sort of make sense. It just seems that there should have been a better way to fix this...LOL. Hind sight is truly 20-20!