Public School Waste

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 6, 2008 8:32pm CST
Our public schools constantly complain that there just isn't enough money in the budget to educate our kids properly. They are always coming up with new ways to fleece the taxpayers a little more, and they aren't above a little extortion or heart string yanking to do it either. But for some reason many school board members find the money for trips to "learn more" about how other districts to things, or for educational conferences that somehow always get held in exotic locations... and usually come with the benefit of no requirements to actually attend any classes at the conference. What would be interesting is to see an audit of our school districts, resulting in a report breaking down the expenditures that go to directly educating the students, continuing education for the teachers and purely administrative costs. Judging by the fact that the schools here in Sheboygan have brand new, state of the art exercise rooms (that would be the envy of any Gold's Gym), but can't seem to find the money to buy new text books. I also found something else interesting. When the school district was campaigning for passage of the referedum to build these new gyms, they quoted Dance Team members who complained that they had to practice in a hallway near the auditorium. They said it was embarrassing to practice where everyone walking past them could watch. Last year (two years after the additions were completed and put to use), I was at the school to pick up one of my kids. As I passed the auditorium, what did I see? The Dance Team practicing... with their new gym empty and unused at the time.
2 people like this
3 responses
• United States
7 Oct 08
The problem is they do not spend the money wisely. They do not need more money, they just need to use what they have wisely. They focus on all wrong things. But then that is just one more reason why I homeschool (more of a virtual school). My son is in kindergarten and he is learning things most public school kids do not touch til the second grade.
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
10 Oct 08
Well, that's good for you, but I plan to send my son to a public school. I hope to find the best one I can for him when the time comes, and if I can't, well, maybe I'll try my best to afford a private school. I think socialization is also an important part of learning. I just hope you have your son in some sort of extra-curricular activity, as well, where he can interact with other kids his age. You can have all the knowledge in the world, but if you don't know how to interact it's hard to get ahead. This world is about who you know and not necessarilly what you know.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
14 Nov 08
What socialization? Gangs? Clicques? Teachers who care more about indoctrination than education? Is that the socialization you mean?
@devylan (695)
• United States
14 Nov 08
Ted, of course I must mean that I want my son to join a gang. Please, give me a break. No, that is not what I mean. What I mean is learning how to interact with other people whether they are different from you or the same as you and learning which types of people are better for your well-being. Anyway, I went to public schools growing up and not once did I ever think about joining a gang or participating in anything outside the normal realm of teenage rebellion. I admit I did some dumb things, but I learned from them, and I may have done them regardless of how or by whom I was schooled.
• United States
10 Oct 08
I think this sort of thing has been happening for a very long time. Years ago back when I was still in school I lived in a small town. There was another small town about 6 miles away. Both towns each had their own elementary and jr. high schools but each town shared the same highschool and still do as far as I know. Just before my 8th grade shcool year, each of these towns decided that they wanted to build a new jr. high. A bill was sent out to increase taxes in order to make funding for this possible. The people of both towns decided that a new building was not necessary, hence the bill did not pass for either town. A year later, we had a bad snow storm after which a few minor repairs were needed for one of the jr. highs. Seizing their opportunity, both towns immediately closed their jr. highs and moved all the students into temporary modular buildings which they set up on the highschool grounds. They then made a statement declaring that both jr. high school buildings were ready to be condemned and unsafe for people to be in them. Shortly after that, they circulated the same bill, which this time passed as people naturally feared for their children sitting in an "unsafe" building while attending class. These 2 towns now also share the same jr. high, which is an impressive state of the arch building built next to the highschool. The kicker? Those "ready to be condemned, unsafe" old jr. high buildings opened up immediately after the bill passed and were used to for various things such as a video rental place in one room, the gymnasium was used for a community gym, the cafeteria was used for various community events, and many of the other classrooms were frequently used for various events of one form or another. I find it pretty funny to use an unsafe building for so many things that require people to come and go from it.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Oct 08
Isn't it wonderful that so many could benefit from one blatant lie.
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
10 Oct 08
Wow. That's funny. They're embarrassed about being watched during practice, but they are watched by everyone during pep rallies and games, so what's the difference? That's just silly, and I don't buy it. Yes, there should be a report. The problem that I see with public schools, though, is the standardized tests. Think about this. The higher your school's test scores are, the more funding your school gets for books, supplies, and various other things. The lower your school's test scores are, the less funding you get. To me, it seems like the kids with the lower test scores need more funding for new books, etc. Why should we hold the students accountable for the entire school's performance? It sounds like a problem that falls on the teachers' and administration's shoulders. I'm not saying that there aren't students out there that just don't try to do better, because there are, but if you're an elementary student who attends a school with an empty feild for a playground, with maybe a tether ball poll without the ball attached (I have seen this in the town I live in), and on the way home riding on the bus you pass a school with brand new equipment just because the students made better test scores, well, wouldn't you get a little jaded and stop caring a bit about school, as well? I know I would. Anyway, not only should funding go toward continuing education for teachers (and administration I might add), these same teachers should themselves be required to take their own standardized tests every few years. It's about accountability. My mom is a teacher, and I know she would be in favor of this idea.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
10 Oct 08
Well, actually there is a difference. Practice is where you learn a routine and polish it, the performance is the finished product. But I doubt they are as embarrassed as they made out when they were hoping for a new gym, considering they now have it and choose to practice in the hallway anyway. ;~D The problem is, they see the public as a cash cow to be milked and once the money is in their budget, they should be able to spend it as they please. Standardized testing is a problem, but far from the only one (or even the major one). Like most other situations, the problem is institutionalized arrogance.
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
10 Oct 08
Yep. Institutionalized Arrogance. Hmmm... I like that.
@devylan (695)
• United States
14 Nov 08
Hey, thanks for best response, Ted!