Critical Thinkers vs. Mindless Minions in Politics...

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 8, 2008 11:37am CST
In politics (like in everything else largely left up to personal opinion), there are two kinds of people. Critical Thinkers, and Mindless Minions. Mindless Minions are those who choose a candidate based on meaningless or arbitrary things like the letter after a candidate's name, or worse yet, their charisma or physical appearance. These are people who look to the politicians they back as the greatest politician ever. The politician can do no wrong and anyone who sees even the slightest blemish is either hatefull, just doesn't understand or should be barred from voting all together. They are the scum who steal lawn signs, vandalize cars with bumperstickers of the oposition, take part in fraudulent voting and other crimes. Yes, there are Mindless Minions in every party, or not party at all. There are also Mindless Minions at all points on in the political spectrum. The Critical Thinker is one who might have a candidate or party of choice, but bases their decision on issues. They read up on each of the candidates whose names will appear on the ballot and compare what they read to their own stances. The are willing to defend their candidates or parties, but they are also willing to call them to task when they make wrong choices. They also acknowedge that there are right choices, wrong choices and those that can go either way. Yes, there are Critical Thinkers in all parties and political persuasions. Most Critial Thinkers do have Mindless Minion moments, but we all have weak moments at times, don't we.
4 people like this
4 responses
@Myrrdin (3599)
• Canada
8 Oct 08
Great post Para. This is exactly true. Every party has the zealot supporter who supports the party regardless of the issue. They will argue till they are blue in the face that everything their party does is right, and everything every other party does is wrong. Zealots are bad, regardless of it is religious zealotry or political zealotry.
4 people like this
@Lee_Rites (845)
• United States
8 Oct 08
I saw the topic of your discussion and just had to read it. That was great! I have gotten to the point where every time someone gives some superficial bs reason they are supporting a candidate it just makes me want to repeatedly bang my head into a wall.
3 people like this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
9 Oct 08
One thing I know, is no politician is a superstar.. even superstars aren't! People come with good points and flaws.. I especially don't think any public person should be on a pedestal. It just isn't logical.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
9 Oct 08
I saw an interview once with Geddy Lee (the bass player/singer for RUSH). He was asked he had any heroes he wanted to meet. He said, "I have heroes, but I wouldn't want to meet them. It would ruin it to learn how they are just human too." I agree with him, we all have people we put on pedastals, and it's sad when those pedastals get knocked down. Politicians running for office should expect to have their pedastals smacked around a bit. :~D
1 person likes this
@eaforeman6 (8979)
• United States
8 Oct 08
Isnt it suppose to be about record, experience, dedication,and MCcain has payed his dues. How can Obama's experience compare to his. It is an insult to even atempt to do that.His service to our military and to congress, is undisputable, and actualy he should have been president along time ago.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
8 Oct 08
Actually, it doesnt' have anything to do with any of that. It only has to do with which candidate can attract 50%+1 of the voters in each state. It may be true that he should have been president a long time ago, but he didn't win a primary election until this time. I am glad to see though that you do take things like experience and his record into consideration. They may not be what it's about, but they are what thinking people look into.