Does Obama support segregation?

@Taskr36 (13963)
United States
October 9, 2008 4:03pm CST
Here's one to think about. In Obama's home town of Chicago, Illinois they are planning a segregated school specifically for homosexuals. Now I know some will be fooled into thinking this is a good thing, but for those of you who believe that, please look at the arguments used to support the segregation of African Americans. You'll notice they peddled the same garbage then about how it was "safer" to have African Americans in different schools and how this would be "better for them". No matter how you dress it up or what excuses you come up with segregation is what it is. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,435102,00.html
4 people like this
5 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
9 Oct 08
The difference between setting up a school where homosexual students can go to class without being harassed and the segregation of the old days is that these students can attend this school by choice...not by force. Unless I'm mistaken.
2 people like this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
9 Oct 08
It's setting a dangerous precedent. Segregation wasn't forced initially until people realized the lies about separate, but equal claims. Then they were suddenly told they had to stay in the segregated schools for their own safety. Look at history and you'll see how easy it was to make segregation look appealing in the early years.
1 person likes this
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
10 Oct 08
I don't agree with you Taskr, and here's why. The segregation of African American students was not made to look appealing, it was done out of hatred because white folk didn't want those black kids mingling with their children, drinking out of the same water fountain as they did or eating in the same places that they did. Don't for one minute try to paint it as pretty at any time in history because I know that you know better. There are already Special Services schools all over this country...for the deaf, for the blind, for the mentally challanged and they in no way *prevent* the students who are enrolled there from attending a regular public school should they decide to. THIS is the difference between special needs and segregation...with segregation people did not have a choice. Today they do.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
10 Oct 08
Oh my god. Are you saying that gay people are disabled? I'm sorry, but I just don't know where to go with that... I'm not claiming segregation was EVER pretty. I'm saying that the excuses you're making, are the EXACT same excuses used during the segregation of African Americans.
1 person likes this
@cripfemme (7698)
• United States
10 Oct 08
Of course it's hardly an ideal situation to have a school just for LGBT people but I can see, being an educator myself, that frequently these students are threatened and targeted for behavior we would not approve of by the other students or even their faculty. Of course, sensitivity training is a much better solution but some people are too traumatized to be in regular schools as a result of what has happened to them.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
10 Oct 08
If students and especially faculty are targeting them in public schools then that needs to be dealt with aggressively in the public school system. While students can be disciplined for such acts teachers should be fired for targeting students out of prejudice. I know as well as anyone that teachers often turn a blind eye to bullying, but homosexuals aren't the only victims of it and we can't segregate everyone who gets mistreated. You need to remove the violators, not the victims.
1 person likes this
@cripfemme (7698)
• United States
11 Oct 08
Well said. Anyone who bullies a student, especially a teacher, ought to be fired or suspended (depending on their status). I'm in favor of special schools for anyone, bur think that for the traumatized student or several, we need to have special programs just like for other traumatized, bullied teens. This is of course more well served by programs like gay/straight alliances and other forms of solidarity.
• Canada
9 Oct 08
I don't know what the heck either Obama or McCain support anymore. This election has gotten so far out of whack that it's impossible to tell.
• United States
10 Oct 08
I personally don't think it's a good idea, but the article said that it will be optional. The article also said that most of the 50 people attending the meeting agreed that the school was a good idea. I think it should be up to the individual, but this would at least give them a choice. Why did you have to tie the article to Obama? What does he have to do with it? Chicago is a big place; Obama doesn't own it. Are you trying to say it is his idea? lol
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
10 Oct 08
Sarah Palin has been blamed by liberals, for everything bad that has ever happened in Wasilla and Alaska. Shouldn't we at least consider Obama's position on issues that are not only in the state he represents, but the city he lives in and represented for years as a state senator? I never said it was his idea, but we should certainly wonder whether or not he supports it.
1 person likes this
@bwaybaby (903)
• United States
10 Oct 08
What does this have to do with Obama? Yes, it's Chicago, but it's not like he runs the place. He's not mayor or anything. He's a senator. His job is to represent people in the Senate. He really has no say in anything like this.
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
10 Oct 08
He not only lives there, but represents the State of Illinois. He was also a state senator for years before being a US Senator. As a lawmaker AND a lawyer the issue of segregation, which last time I checked was illegal, should be rather important to him. He certainly has more clout than anyone else in the state of Illinois.
1 person likes this