Obama's Birth Certificate

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
October 14, 2008 6:10pm CST
Ok, I have no idea how valid the accusations are about Obama's birth certificate, but the Democrats really need to make sure his birth certificate is authentic. It could mean more than a mere execution of presidential line of ascension. Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution states that: "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President" If Obama is a natural born citizen then there is no problem here, however, if he isn't (which is what the accusations are all about), then he was never eligible to run, much less accept the office. If that is true, then his election would be null and void, as if it never happened. This is nothing to be merely shrugged off as partisan politics. If Obama wins, and at any time during his adminstration it is proven that he isn't a natural born citizen.... If you ask me, it should be the Obama supporters making the loudest waves to make sure he is truly eligible. Just for the record though, if the arguments against his eligibility are purely based on whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya (or anywhere else). There is nothing in the Constution that mentions geographic place of birth. All it says is "natural born citizen", that means that anyone who argues about geography for either McCain or Obama needs to read the Constitution again.
8 people like this
13 responses
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
15 Oct 08
It's authentic. See the pictures for yourself. http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_1.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_2.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_4.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_6.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_7.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_8.jpg http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_9.jpg Besides, if this was true, Clinton would have used it to clinch the nomination pretty much IMMEDIATELY. Anyone paying attention during the primaries and seeing how hard she fought for the nomination would have to be stupid to think that if there was some way to beat Obama 'by default' in one shot, Clinton would have seized upon it instantly. She didn't because there isn't. I only wish McCain was dumb enough to make a big deal out of it himself.
4 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
Well, factcheck has been wrong before. Like I said though, I'm really not putting any stock in the rumors, I just find it an interesting situation if the Democrat party, the press, or Obama's supporters are just hoping he can get elected, and worry about this later.. if at all. This one is more a "what if" thing than an opinion one.
4 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
btw, Hillary paid little to no attention to Obama's connections with William Ayers either. She completely accepted Obama's explanation that included "my kids go to school with his kids"... which can't be anything but a lie.
3 people like this
• United States
15 Oct 08
In this case, you don't have to heed a single word on the factcheck site. They HELD THE CERTIFICATE IN THEIR HANDS AND TOOK A BUNCH OF PICTURES, which I linked to. Have you looked at them? What do you think is more likely, that they're all somehow forged, or that they're legitimate? Even the certificate number is there in plain sight!
4 people like this
@jerzgirl (9234)
• United States
14 Oct 08
I think this is a non-issue for the simple reason that all candidates have FBI background checks before they're allowed to announce their candidacy (or shortly thereafter). If he weren't eligible, he wouldn't have gotten to where he is now. They go through ALL records with a fine tooth comb (granted, no one did with "Brownie", but he was appointed by Bush and who challenges that authority). If there were questions on either of their eligibility (and there are with McCain as well having been born in Panama Canal Zone), they would not still be in the race. Both are eligible candidates and people just simply need to stop the bullspit!
4 people like this
@jerzgirl (9234)
• United States
14 Oct 08
And, I have defended McCain on his birthplace because military births are still automatically citizens, just as my cousin was having been born in Ankara when her father was stationed there.
4 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
Actually there aren't automatic FBI background checks for candidates.
4 people like this
@jerzgirl (9234)
• United States
15 Oct 08
According to the State Department's website, America.gov, potential VP nominees undergo extensive background checks "to identify weaknesses that could hurt the campaign". Why would they do such extensive checks on the potential VPs and NOT the potential POTUS him/herself??? That makes no sense whatsoever, so I respectfully disagree with you on this one. In the meantime, I will continue to look for a proof text.
3 people like this
@bobmnu (8157)
• United States
15 Oct 08
By not releasing the information he is encouraging the rumors. It makes you think that he has something to hide. Why was his wife's senior thesis sealed? Why are his medical and other records sealed? This is what got John Kerry in trouble with the swift boaters. He said he released his military record but only released part of it. To stop the rumors he needs to open all his records for the public to review.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
True, he brings the rumors on himself.
4 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 08
Not only hasn't he released his records, the ones he has released aren't the ones that answer the questions.
• United States
21 Oct 08
Can you please tell me what Michelle Obama's senior thesis has to do with her husband running for President? She's not running for President, he is. This is just another example of people trying to dig up crap to get everyone to wonder about Obama here at the end of the election.
@eaforeman6 (8979)
• United States
14 Oct 08
Is Obama a Kenya citizen, Indonesia,or a usa citizen? His school records showed him as a citizen of Indonesia when he was in school there.If he is not an American citizen, it is not legal for him to even be a senator. Where is the Vault copy that would show the answer to this question?This is another thing that should have been verified.Some of his family members are saying that he was born in Kenya.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
Yes, Paranoia, but there is some question to the validity of that birth certificate. As I said, I don't know how valid the claims are, but if there is even a speck of reality to them, this really needs to be checked out. It's much more than just a question of "vetting".
3 people like this
• United States
15 Oct 08
Yes, didnt the judge order him to produce the birth certificate?Wasnt it said that the one seen was tampered with and that is what brought it to this?
1 person likes this
• United States
15 Oct 08
Kenya does not allow dual citizenship and I believe they issued a statement saying that he wasn't a citizen. Besides, there's a copy of his birth certificate that's been made available to the public that clearly states that he was born in Hawaii.
4 people like this
@Mare73 (1335)
• United States
15 Oct 08
He was born in Hawaii - Hawaii - last time I checked is a state!
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 08
Actually, some people have challenged his citizenship status. In fact, it has gone all the way to the Supreme Court... decision is pending. http://comments.obamacrimes.com/blog/Articles/_archives/2008/11/2/3959369.html
@Aurone (4755)
• United States
15 Oct 08
No one is debating that if he was born in Hawaii he is a citizen. They are saying maybe he wasn't born in Hawaii, maybe he was born in Kenya. I think it s probably bunk because you would hope that a reporter would have found this by now, but we all know there are ways to shut people up and that Obama has been the media's darling all along. I do find it odd that in the face of this legal action that is being taken he just doesn't send one of his aides to court with the proper documents and put this whole thing to rest. It seems like it would be better for him to do so.
2 people like this
@dvschic (1795)
• United States
15 Oct 08
he'd still be a citizen, even if born in kenya, due to his mothers citizenship and residence in the country prior to leaving. "http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.html" Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock: A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) INA provided the citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child. " http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html" and the constitution has been clarified to reflect the additional definitions of natural born citizen: Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:" * Anyone born inside the United States * Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe * Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S. * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national * Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year * Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21 * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time) * A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
True, which is why I included the last paragraph in the OP.
4 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 08
Apparently according to the laws as they were written on Aug 4 1961, there was a requirement that Barack Obama's mother may not have satisfied for him to be a natural born citizen. "In 1961, as opposed to TODAY, Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as ammended (INA) required the following: A child being born to one alien parent (ie. Non Citizen) and one citizen parent in a marital relationship, required that the sole US citizen parent to have resided in the United States for a period of ten years, five of which must have been over the age of 14. Today's version of the law has somewhat different residency requirements for the US citizen parent. But the law, as it applied on August 4, 1961, required ten years presence, five after the age of 14." http://comments.obamacrimes.com/blog/Articles/_archives/2008/11/2/3959369.html
@devylan (695)
• United States
16 Oct 08
I don't know if you pick Best Responses, Ted, but Dvschic definitely deserves it.
2 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
21 Oct 08
Hello ParaTed, I first posted a thread about this topic over four months ago. As such, I'm deeply troubled that this issue remains under a cloud of obscurity. Additionally, I am absolutely disgusted by this whole mess. Barack Obama could have eliminated this whole issue, and spared the taxpayers the cost and headache of 'trying' this issue in a court of law had he simply supplied the requested long-form birth certificate. Instead, he and the DNC have submitted a Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that Mr. Berg has no right to access the requested document. At issue here is NOT that he might hold dual citizenship with Kenya. In fact, his biological father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. did petition for Kenyan citizenship for his son, when Barack Hussein Obama, Junior was not quite two years old. However, that Kenyan citizenship was legally dissolved, annuled or terminated due to Barack Junior's Indonesian citizenship status. Kenya did NOT recognize dual citizenship, so when Barack Junior was registered in Indonesian public school ("Obama defended his education at "Sekolah Dasar Negeri 04," which roughly translates as government elementary school No. 4 in Indonesia..."), as a Muslim citizen of Indonesia, his Kenyan citizenship became null and void. Incidentally, at the time that Barry Seotoro (A.K.A. Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.) attended Indonesian public school, the laws in Indonesia prohibited any non-citizen from accessing public education -- it was deemed a benefit of citizenship, where only citizens were eligible to attend. He was proclaimed a Muslim Citizen of Indonesia, which is verifiable from his Indonesian public and parrochial school records. "Emirsyah Satar, the CEO of Garuda Indonesia, a large airline corporation. Emirsyah comments on Obama; "He was often in the prayer room wearing a 'sarong', at that time, he was quite religious in Islam but only after marrying Michelle, he changed his religion." http://www.poskota.co.id/news_baca.asp?id=29295&ik=6 http://laotze.blogspot.com/2007/01/obama-hoisted-on-his-own-petard-one.html As I understand it from extensive review: when Barry Seotoro (Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.) was returned to the United States, his mother or grandparents would have had to petition the U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Dept. for Barack Jr. to apply for U.S. citizenship, since his adoption of Indonesian citizenship dissolved his U.S. citizenship, as Indonesia and the USA did not have a reciprocal dual citizenship treaty at that time. There is no evidence that Barack's mother or grandparents applied for citizenship for the minor child, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. after he was returned to the United States in his tenth year. This Indonesian citizenship issue is elevated to the status of a powerful case against Barack Obama's eligibility to run for POTUS given the supposition that Barack Obama may have travelled to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport during his years in NYC, his Columbia University days. If this is so, then it would indicate that Barack Obama claimed Indonesian citizenship as late as the 1980s. Of course, this cannot be confirmed or debunked because Barack Obama has had his personal records sealed, including those records relevant to his Columbia University days. If he would just release his travel records during his time at Columbia University, a great part of this issue would be dissolved. "Yet he declined repeated requests to talk about his New York years, release his Columbia transcript or identify even a single fellow student, co-worker, roommate or friend from those years." http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html "Senior Strategist Mark Penn subtly admonished reporters for not digging deepy enough into Obama’s unreleased documents. “One would think the demand would not be for some additional information when we’ve already done senate disclosures, but of this important set of information about Senator Obama that could be critical for the voters in these last 12 jurisdictions making their decisions,”...'. http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/03/16/clinton-campaign-calls-for-obamas-records/ There is also the issue of a little know immigration law which imposed a time stipulation to jus soli births in the early 1960s. Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. cannot claim 'natural born' status by jus sanguinis, as only one of his parents was a U.S. citizen. Which means that Obama may only claim citizenship by jus soli. Stanley Ann Dunham, his mother, did not meet the time requirement of 'adult status' to automatically convey natural-born status to her son Barack, so even if he was born on Oahu, he is still ineligible to claim 'natural born' status by jus soli. Last, there is this third argument: "If you consider the history and believe that Hawaii is not legally a part of the United States, as many do, then one might ask, is Obama a natural born citizen of the United States? One could even make the argument that being born in Hawaii, he's a Hawaiian national! I believe the most compelling legal analysis based on Hawaiian kingdom and international law and precedent, is that the Hawaiian national population today is comprised of descendants of Hawaiian subjects and those foreigners who were born in the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1898." http://www.hawaiiankingdom.info/C1126750129/E20080215214658/index.html So, there are three separate allegations of why and how Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen, and therefore ineligible to run for POTUS. Do any of the three arguments have merit? I do not claim to know, nor do I suggest that anyone other than his deceased mother knows for sure. The answer eludes us because Barack Obama has refused to provide access to his full history. This all goes away if and when Barack Obama grants permission to the State of Hawaii to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests, or responds to the issue in the traditional way by providing a certified copy of the long-form birth certificate to Barack Obama, who in turn would need to submit it to the Pennsylvania court to comply with Mr. Berg's discovery demands. Incidentally, a second lawsuit has been filed in a Washington Court which similarly seeks to force Barack Obama to submit the long-form birth certificate. So, instead of this issue going away, it is spreading. Costing taxpayers in two different states now. And, that's what makes me really angry. Why not just supply the darned document???
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 08
Exactly! The fact that Obama has refused to do the one thing that would put all the rumors to rest is telling... and disgusting. Why play all the hiding games if his actual birth certificate would answer all the questions? The main point though, what happens if he wins the White House and it turns out he was not eligible to even run?
1 person likes this
@MissGia (955)
• United States
15 Oct 08
For the love of god will people stop it all ready. If he wasn't a US born citizen I'm pretty sure someone would have found out by now and i'm sure it's already been checked into. Some may not agree with our Government but they're not that stupid to where they would let an unnatural citizen into office. I don't know where those accusations are coming from, but i'm wanting to bet that it has something to do with his name and family HERITAGE. if that is the case than the people making these accusations are just plain dumb and are making generalized assumptions.
2 people like this
@MissGia (955)
• United States
15 Oct 08
Are you guys calling our government neglectful to look into an issue such as citizenship. If he wasnt a natural citizen he wouldn't be a Senator as we speak. I don't care where the man went to school or who he went to school with.. that's not the type of stuff i look into when i pick my presidential candidate. The issue here is his citizenship..and if your so concerned about it contact the US Government and tell them you feel that Obama is frauding the US Government and has wrongfully be a senator for how ever many years.
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
Yup, like we knew that Ayers and Obama's kids go to school together, right?
2 people like this
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
15 Oct 08
MissGia, Again, I ask, why is this such a big deal? It doesn't have to be but Obama is choosing to make it one! I don't see the problem, if he has a valid birth certificate then why stonewall a Philadelphia court?
2 people like this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
3 Nov 08
I think that the Democrats do not want to bother because they want Obama for President even if it was found he was not born in the United States, had never lost his citizenship because he lived in another country, etc. They want an exception made because he is black, i.e. descended from Negro slaves. But that is a fallacy. Obama's Negro side is not descended from slaves, therefore to compensate him by forgetting the law that only natural born citizen (of the States) can become president is false. I do not think that they mean a natural born citizen of another country can become a citizen unless it refers to someone born in the U.S. embassy or a territory of the United States in another country.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 08
Sadly, I doubt a lot of Democrats would care.
1 person likes this
@carolscash (9492)
• United States
20 Oct 08
Like many others have said here, I am sure that if he were not a legal US citizen then he would not be at this point in the game. There are so many people who are looking for a way to get him out of this election that I believe they would have found out that his birth certificate was fake. Please America, let's stick to the guidlines that we have for an election and vote in the most worthy President!
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 08
His actual birth certificate has never been produced. What has been produced is a document called Certification of Live Birth. This is not the same as a Certificate of Live Birth (Birth Certificate).
@kenzie45230 (3560)
• United States
15 Oct 08
I guess what I wonder about is that when this lawsuit was filed about his birth certificat being falsified, that's when Obama rushed off to Hawaii. He brought back a birth certificate that he gave to factcheck.org - which is an Annenberg organization - which means it has ties to Ayers and Obama. I wonder why he didn't present it to the court?
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
15 Oct 08
Factcheck is an Annberg organization? I may never cite it again!
2 people like this
@philjas (1134)
• United States
15 Oct 08
A CONSERVATIVE blog that points out how silly this whole thing is: http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/12/obama-is-an-american-no-really/ Of course there are some commenters there that still don't believe it, but if you ask me trying to claim that Obama might not be an American citizen is as bad as the liberals who still insist Trig Palin is actually Bristol's baby. I realize that wouldn't have anything to do with Sarah Palin's qualifications to be VP, but I'm saying that both arguments are just desperate grasping at straws attempts on the part of partisans to prove something bad about the opponent. Sometimes people just make stuff up and run with it to discredit the other side.
3 people like this
@devylan (695)
• United States
16 Oct 08
Thank you, Philjas.
1 person likes this
• Alexandria, Virginia
15 Oct 08
why is the main stream media not discussing this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Nov 08
That's a good question. Another good question is, why hasn't any of the press that has covered this explained to the public that there is a difference between a Certificate of Live Birth (Birth Certificate) and a Certification of Live Birth (which is what everyone has seen).
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
15 Oct 08
Great question shoffman! If there was any validity whatsoever to the claim that Obama was not an American citizen investigative reporters would have uncovered the evidence by now. Imagine the national recognition the reporter who broke the story would get. This is not being discussed by the mainstream media...on either the right or the left...because it is a non-issue
4 people like this
@devylan (695)
• United States
16 Oct 08
Well, if someone who isn't legally a citizen wins the presidency, then maybe we should rethink our Constitution.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Oct 08
Why attack the Constitution to protect what would be a lie? Why do you have so little respect for the US Constitution?
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
20 Oct 08
True, and there are times it does need a little tweaking, but not to accomidate a president who ran illegally. Glad you clarified the misunderstanding.
3 people like this
@devylan (695)
• United States
20 Oct 08
I am not attacking the Constitution, and I'm sorry if I came across that way. If I understand things correctly, though, and please correct me if I'm wrong, when our forefathers wrote the Constitution, they had the insight to realize that sometimes things need to be tweaked to adapt with the changing times. That is all I am saying. Anyway, we've already established that he is a legal citizen, so this is not an issue in this instance.
1 person likes this