Universal Health Care is not the answer!
By katsmeow1213
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
United States
October 20, 2008 3:33pm CST
I'm amazed at how many people actually think this is a good idea!
Sure, it's difficult to afford insurance and co-pays and all other fees associated with health care, believe me I know. I currently owe close to $40,000 in medical debt to hospitals to pay for procedures that were not covered by my insurance. I can't afford that, so yes, we need some sort of help with our health care system.
But universal health care? No!! The money to pay for that has to come from somewhere, so where is it going to come from? Our taxes. It will more than double our taxes. In the end you'll be paying the same, if not more for health care through your tax dollars, and taxes are capable of hitting us harder. They can put a tax on everything from your wages to your purchases, and your yearly taxes on your properties. Don't be fooled thinking that a universal health care system will actually be free!!
And do you actually think you'll recieve the same level of care that you do now? Don't count on it. Doctors won't be paid as much, so it won't be a lucrative profession, which means we won't see as many doctors and nurses. That means wait times for life saving procedures will be longer. How long are you willing to wait for treatment? Weeks? Months? What if you have 3 months to live without the procedure, but they can't fit you in until 6 months out because there just aren't enough doctors? Wouldn't you be willing to pay more to get the treatment sooner?
Tell me, in all honesty... how is universal health care going to actually help us??
Yes we need to find ways to make health care more affordable, I will not argue that. But it should be something along the lines of supplimental insurance for the lower income, something that will help with co-pays and fees that our primary insurance won't cover. That would be more affordable for the government (without raising taxes) and for the people.
5 people like this
13 responses
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
20 Oct 08
"But universal health care? No!! The money to pay for that has to come from somewhere, so where is it going to come from? Our taxes. It will more than double our taxes."
It is almost impossible that this would be true. In every other industrialized nation that has universal health care, the cost is less per person than it is here in the USA. However, those countries also have higher life expectancies, and lower incidences of preventable diseases/illnesses/etc. than the US.
So if it's done right, it will certainly NOT cost more than the system we have now. If other countries can do it, why can't we? The US has no business holding such a pitiful position compared to other industrialized nations in preventable diseases, for crying out loud.
1 person likes this
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
20 Oct 08
Last time I was in Ontario, Canada which was less than a year ago, their sales tax was something near 20%. Here in NY state our sales tax is 7%. Canada has free health care. So yes, it is going to more than double our taxes.
And as far as life expectancy and disease, you're not looking at the other variables here, such as the types of people in those countries compaired to ours. Our country has a very high immigration rate, does this come into play in our life expectancy? How about our jobs, our environment? It cannot just be the health care at play here.
1 person likes this
@ClarusVisum (2163)
• United States
20 Oct 08
Oops, I didn't quite say what I meant to. I mean the OVERALL cost will definitely NOT be higher. The increase in taxes would be MORE than compensated for by the elimination of inflated insurance premiums we'd no longer have to pay.
3 people like this
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
I only have to pay $40 a week for health insurance, and nothing more unless I see a doctor. My taxes would be far more than that on a weekly basis with this free health care system, regardless if I see a doctor or not.

@Lindalinda (4111)
• Canada
21 Oct 08
Well to start with I believe the USA is the only civilized country in the world that does not have have universal health care. Certainly all the European countries of the Western World have it. It astonishes me constantly that Americans are against it. The richest nation in the world cannot offer decent health care to its citizens. You yourself said you owe 40 000 in medical bills. That must be a totally crushing burden.
I live in Canada and we have universal health care. Sure a lot of people complain that the waiting period for certain operations are too long, it is difficult to schedule an MRI if you need it soon, etc etc. Let me tell you I will be eternally grateful that we have it.
After a collapse in my son's house this summer I was taken to the hospital. I stayed there for two days. I had several ECG's, an MRI, a CT scan and was seen by three specialists. After I was discharged I received a bill in the mail for $ 46.30
as my share of the ambulance fee. I can live with that and I am not in debt because of medical bills.
I am retired on a fixed income and could not afford to pay the prices that US
hospitals charge if you have to be admitted. Most of my friends do not venture into the US without extra medical coverage, even for one day.
It is true that we have to wait for certain procedures but they are usually not live threatening. Other times we are inconvenienced. Since I needed another MRI. I was told the unit operated 24 hours a day 6 days a week. Would I be willing to accept an appointment at 3 in the morning? Yes of course, it would only cost me $ 30.00 to order a taxi to get me there at that time of the night. Is this not acceptable? I was told I could have an appointment across the border in Buffalo USA the next day at a charge of $ 700. Did I take the night appointment? of course I did.
Do we get the same quality of medical care as in the USA? I am convinced we do. Canadian specialists are on the forefront in the world as far as research and
expertise is concerned. Do we pay for it in our taxes, yes of course we do. But we also know we can partake in preventative medicine, have regular checkups, be referred to specialists before it is too late and get treatment for life threatening conditions. Most of all though, every person rich or poor can get treatment. We also have the options if we have the money and don't want to wait to scoot across the border and pay thousands there.
So ask any citizen of any country that has universal healthcare if they want to give it up. I think you can guess the answer. Shame on America for neglecting health care for families on the poverty line, for young independent people working for minimum wages, for the elderly, for the indigent and homeless. It is the duty of any civilized society to look after its people.

@Lindalinda (4111)
• Canada
21 Oct 08
You are absolutely right I have to pay taxes whether or not I see a doctor but you also have to pay taxes don't you? The difference is when I am sick and I am retired or I need special care I am not required to pay for it again. I can tell you I am greatly comforted that in my old age I will be taken care of by universal health insurance.
By the way I live in Ontario. I have heard a lot of people complain because they have to wait for months to get an MRI or a hernia operation. When I dug deeper it turned out they will only take day appointments for an MRI or they want their operation done at a special hernia clinic instead of a regular hospital.
As for your friend in Nova Scotia, I am sorry she had to wait so long and I am convinced it was painful but at least she is not $ 40 000 in debt over it.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
You have to pay taxes regardless if you see a doctor that year or not... I do not have to pay my medical insurance co-pays and other fees if I do not see a doctor.
What part of Canada are you from may I ask? Because a good friend of mine who lives in Nova Scotia had to wait months for an operation to remove her uterus that was hanging out of her body. MONTHS!! It was painful. She literally had to peel her uterus off her panties to use the bathroom... and they made her wait months!
I enjoy my health coverage as it is.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
Ontario does have better coverage than most other provinces. Personally, I'd rather pay more to be pain free sooner.

@cripfemme (7698)
• United States
21 Oct 08
As a disabled person and a health educator, I must disagree with you. If people can't afford healthcare they don't get treatment early when things are more easily fixable. As others have said, we are the only industrialized nation that doesn't have it. I think this is bad for America, as a whole.

@cripfemme (7698)
• United States
21 Oct 08
I know disabled people other industrialized countries. I work with them on disability rights issues, across boarders. They are doing better than we are in terms of both health care and economics, because they have what they need in terms of assistive technology and medical care to be productive, happy people. We should be so lucky here.
@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
25 Oct 08
It would help if EVERYBODY had access to free preventive care. I think this the problem with some people - it is too expensive for them to even go have an annual physical, so they don't. Problems are not caught until they have nagging awful symptoms they can't ignore and wind up at the ER with a brain tumor....
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
Trust me we won't be able to afford it if it's free either! How much in taxes are you willing to pay? I'd rather pay my $40 a week for insurance.

@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
21 Oct 08
You, at least have health care coverage, katsmeow. It is shameful that in a country that is supposed to be the greatest nation in the world there are so many people with no health care. Where is the money going to come from? Well, they are printing money right and left for everything else, so, why not health care? For starters we could get out of these wars we have become bogged down in. The costs of these wars is breaking the back of America, and there is no end in sight. Many people here are going hungry, homeless, and without health care while we are financing endless wars. Where is the sense in that?

@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
5 Nov 08
If there is so much gold in the vault, katsmeow, why are you the only one aware of this? According to everything I've heard over the last several years the gold just isn't there. I stand by my statement that health care should be available to everyone equally!
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
Health insurance is and should be available to everyone, at low cost for low income. yes we do need more options and it does need to be more accessable and affordable... but not universal.
There will always be war, regardless of where or when, we can't avoid that.
Printing money?? If they could print money just because they felt like it, our nation would not be in debt. Money is printed based on how much gold is in the vault. The more they print, the more the dollar value goes down. Printing more money on a whim is not the answer either.
Canada has universal health care, their sales tax is 14%... think about that!

@thegreatdebater (7316)
• United States
21 Oct 08
Well Kats, if universal health care isn't the answer than what is? Do you realize that GE, and GM spend over 3 billion dollars a year in health care? That is just two companies, just imagine how much we, as a nation, spend. I think we need to find some the help us, because our current system isn't working.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
I realize our current system isn't working, but universal health care is only going to make it so much worse. Yes we need help, we need low cost insurance that is more accessable to everyone who needs it.
1 person likes this
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
Yes we definitly must come up with a plan, I won't argue that. As I said, I'm in financial trouble myself due to medical bills. I believe they should help those who can't afford to help themselves, make insurance more accessable and more affordable for everyone. Perhaps we should do something about the malpractice lawsuits as that's why healthcare is so expensive as it is.
@jonsmom2 (1)
• United States
21 Oct 08
I agree that our current system isn't working, but instead of looking at all the rest of the systems and saying that they won't work here, we need to come up with something that will work here. After all we can put men on the moon but can't come up with a universal health plan that won't cost the taxpayers a fortune and yet still provide decent care for everyone....what's wrong with that picture???
1 person likes this

@LilPixelle (828)
• United States
21 Oct 08
I agree completely with the original statment, someone here said that other universal health care systems work ... I can think of one Very Good reason why ours wouldnt. We are Americans. thats it. Thats my reason, its because we can AFFORD to treat our bodies like crap, we can AFFORD to eat out 30 times a week, and we can AFFORD to smoke, and just generally treat our bodies like crap until one day, Oh no. We need a new lung, or a new kidney or we suddenly have diabetes, or w/e it is, its because we treat our bodies like such crap, we couldnt afford to treat others who couldnt figure out what they were doing to themselves, and you know what? I dont think I should have to pay for them, I work hard to keep my body healthy and make choices to save my money rather than buy all the junk food they do, why should I have to spend MY money on them too? yes there are people who sincerely did nothing to deserve their sickness... but in a lot of cases, people are earning it these days, and because of that, there would be more people needing money from the system, than putting into the system, and frankly, I dont want to pay for them, I'd rather save my money, and protect my body and pay for myself. I mean, I would consider dumping a bunch of my money in if someone was in a car accident or something, but I dont think I should be forced to pay for the soda guzzling woman who has been smoking for the last 40 years, who ways 300 pounds and suddenly got lung cancer, she could have avoided both of those, and I didn't get ANYTHING for what she payed into it, thus why should I bail her out? Not saying I never would... I just dont think the government should force me to, its not their right.
@LilPixelle (828)
• United States
22 Oct 08
I understand that Camo, there are a lot of people born with sicknesses like that, I understand that, but I honestly believe that a majority of the cases in America these days are beginning to be self induced. and I dont think its fair that they spent all there money to get that way and then they take my money to treat themselces for being that way, thats just not fair... now I think I might be willing to part with a fair portion of my money for someone who honestly didnt earn their disease. but its not the governments right to force money out of me when they didnt sanction how the other person treated their body (which is also not their right) in plain english, it really just isnt their right, now a non profit org that collected money for people in high need of medical help, now that would be different and I think I would be willing to support that.
@LilPixelle (828)
• United States
24 Oct 08
Didnt use to come from the government, use to be more of a barter system of precious metals, you know, something with value...and y'know in other countries and long time ago here, it was legal to sell people. was it their right to do that too? the government allowed and endorsed it, was that their right? Just because they can and do do it, doesnt mean they are right, essentially what the government is doing is taking my hard work and giving it to people who didnt earn it, some deserve it, and some dont, and my problem is that I dont get any say in it.

@anniepa (27955)
• United States
21 Oct 08
I kind of get the impression your mind is made up and that's that, which is your right, but it should be pointed out that Obama has never proposed government run health care or "free" health care for all. We all pay much higher premiums and much higher costs for health care because of the many people who are uninsured and wait to go to the ER when they get sick and then are unable to pay. I won't pretend to be knowledgeable enough to know the exact details of the plan that would work best for everyone but I do know nobody in a nation such as ours should go bankrupt, lose their home or die because of health care costs and McCain's plan would help nobody that needs help.
Annie
@Galena (9110)
•
25 Oct 08
I come from the UK, where we have the NHS paid for through taxes.
it's not perfect, but it's the best system there is.
because I earn too little to pay taxes, it costs me nothing. when I was earning more, I paid for it through my taxes.
if anything is wrong with me I don't need to worry about whether or not I can afford to pay for medical care, it's there for me.
those that want to pay more to have treatment quicker, or at a higher level, can pay privately. those that can't don't go without.
seriously, I would never ever ever exchange a national health service for the American system, which I find absolutely third world in comparison. why should only the wealthy get healthcare? what if I needed an operation? what about when I was bitten on the face by my dog. what if I'd just had to let it heal as it would, rather than getting stitched up, then getting to go back and have the scarring tidied up so that I wouldn't look like Freddie Krueger. I was out of work at the time through illness, so would never have been able to pay for cosmetic restoration.
I was shocked when I first discovered that Americans have to pay for their healthcare themselves, through insurance if they can afford to have insurance, or finding the money somehow.
I thought that sort of thing only happened in third world countries.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
25 Oct 08
Our system is not that bad. I am not wealthy but I have insurance. It costs us $40 a week, and sometimes we have to pay a little more when we see a doctor.
If we did not get insurance through work, and could not afford to pay for it, we could get government aid insurance, which is completely free for low income families. There are many options for that. There's absolutely no reason anyone should go without insurance here.
And, if we do not have insurance, the doctors still have to see us. We didn't have insurance once and my husband needed his appendix taken out. They did it, no questions asked, at one of the best hospitals in the city. Granted we had a large bill to pay afterwards, but they told us of the government programs we could sign up for to have it paid, even after it was already done.
I don't think our system is all that bad.

@libertarianfreedom21 (3198)
• United States
28 Oct 08
There are differant ways to save money like the company im with is a health discount plans company that has hospital advocacy that would of probally reduced your $40k in debt to a much lower amount. But there is a lot of things about this election that I dont get. Like the total socializim view of obama that no one seems to relieze is a very BAD idea no matter how good of a person he seems to be or whatever. I can understand people being tired of republicans but dont let it make you make a bad decision on who is president. Mccain isnt perfect but hes better than Obama
@ersmommy1 (12587)
• United States
21 Oct 08
I think alot of people feel something is better than nothing. Alot of people are going broke trying to afford something in the way of healthcare. I have family that has no healthcare. If you are scared you may go for anything. Whether you believe it to be the answer or not.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
But nobody is looking at what that's going to cost us in the long run. Yes health care is expensive... I've been complaining about it for years myself, especially back in the days when we were paying $100 a week for it while trying to get food stamps to put food on our table. I was asking them why I couldn't get help with my insurance since we couldn't afford it. They offer health coverage to low income families, but not if it's offered through your job. And of course when applying for food stamps they don't take that bill into consideration.
So no it's not a perfect system, I'll never say it is. But we'll be losing far more money in taxes if this goes into affect. We're already losing $200 a week towards income tax... that doesn't even count how much we pay for sales tax, property tax, car taxes, anything else.
Canadian sales tax is 14% in Ontario, that's just sales tax, and part of that is to cover their health care system. That's just an idea of what we'll be looking forward to if and when we go into a universal health care system.
@Hatley (163772)
• Garden Grove, California
21 Oct 08
katsmeow I disagree.almost every other country has universal health care and they actually get better care, so I feel your arguments are the same old one republicans have used for a century, they just do not want us middle and working class to finally get the kind of health care other nations have had
'for ages. I am a senior citizen with a great hmo so I am well covered but myadult son has no insurance and it wou ld cost him a fortune to get coverage,hes just 49 so he cannot get social
security yet. we working and middle class people need help to afford good health care, why cannot we have the same univeral
health care as all the other more progressive nations?The crap
you suggest is the samw old welfare crapola that none of us
working people want, too many strings attached to it, you just breathe the wrong way you would get penalized. no I wish we could have universal health care.
@mimico (3617)
• Philippines
21 Oct 08
In my country, we already pay a lot of taxes but there is still no support from the government when it comes to health care. I'm lucky that my parents can afford the best doctors for me if and when I get sick (knock on wood), but I see a lot of poor people who can't afford it and that's when I realize how important a universal health care could be. Of course the funds will come from the rich who can afford to be taxed more, but the poor will be the primary beneficiaries. After all, why would the rich want to go to the same hospitals as the poor when they could afford better treatment at a more expensive place? My point is that it would be better to have a universal health care than none at all.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
The taxes are passed on to the rich and the poor. We would be in no better shape than we are now.
@philjas (1134)
• United States
21 Oct 08
In every other industrialized nation that has universal health care
Which would be EVERY OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED nation.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe every other industrialized or medically advanced nation in the world has it, except us. France is considered to have the best health care in the world, and yep, it's universal healthcare.

@mommyboo (13174)
• United States
25 Oct 08
Kat, you're making it sound like doctors are greedy and only practicing for the money. That bothers me, if that is true. It bothers me if anybody choose a career based on the money and not because it's something they care about. I hope sincerely not to ever employ somebody who is doing their job strictly for the money. They don't deserve to be paid if that's why they chose it. I mean my doctor could give me unsound advice, prescribe things I don't need, or tell me I need procedures I don't in order to make money. That's a pretty horrendous thought.
@katsmeow1213 (28716)
• United States
21 Oct 08
Canada has it, and it's not working out so well for them. Because their doctors are coming to practice here to make more money. What do you think is going to happen to our doctors if this goes into affect? They'll switch careers!













