RNC Appears to Shell Out $150,000 For Palin Fashion

@anniepa (27955)
United States
October 21, 2008 7:47pm CST
I guess the small town values Sarah Palin likes to talk about doesn't include shopping for a wardrobe fit for a Vice Presidential campaign for herself and her family! The RNC has apparently spent over $150,000 for clothing and accessories for Sarah Palin and her family starting since her selection as John McCain's running mate in late August; these expenditures include bills from Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York for a combined $49,425.74 as well as one $75,062.63 shopping trip at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis. $4,716.49 was also spent on hair and makeup through September by the RNC after no such bills in August. http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081022/pl_politico/14805 The question is, does she get to keep the clothes after the campaign ends and the Obama/Biden team moves into the White House? I wonder, did she choose all those black skirts herself or did the campaign pick them out for her? Annie
4 people like this
10 responses
• United States
22 Oct 08
Good question, Annie. I guess she could just list them on her taxes as gifts, huh? Or maybe she will donate them to charity? lol I did see that the article said that examination of similar records for the Obama campaign and the DNC turned up no similar spending. Maybe the McCain campaign thinks the black skirts make Palin look more "serious?" She drives me up the wall constantly pulling her jackets down. Has anyone else noticed that? I guess she's not used to dressing so fine, huh? lol Michelle Obama, on the other hand, always looks good in her clothes. But then, she's not putting on for anyone.
3 people like this
@piasabird (1737)
• United States
22 Oct 08
I think that Michelle Obama looks like a man in drag. You know she's so tall and all. And by all I mean she looks like a man.
1 person likes this
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
22 Oct 08
Michelle could use braces. They can afford them.
@piasabird (1737)
• United States
22 Oct 08
Yes, she could! But I do have to say she sure looks better than she did when they first met. OMG! Talk about a mess! Barack sure didn't marry her for her looks. It must be for her socialist leanings. They had things in common. lol
@Opal26 (17679)
• United States
22 Oct 08
Hi annie, That's pretty funny! She spent all that money on those clothes! Damn, what was she wearing before? It took all that money to buy that? I don't get it! She doesn't look like she dresses for that kind of cash. I'm kind of speechless! I didn't know such plain drab clothes cost that much. But, then again I really shouldn't talk because I honestly don't pay much attention to her and what she is wearing. I think that she is an attractive woman, but I don't think that she dresses particulary stylish. But, maybe that's because I am not really looking or interested in her because I am not supporting her or her party.
2 people like this
@irishidid (8687)
• United States
22 Oct 08
Is there any comparison to how much money Michelle Obama has spent? She could use Cindy's help too. Michelle's clothes remind me of the dresses I've seen in the thrift shop. Not a slam, just an observation. I'm sure they all spend money on things we'd rather they didn't and I don't think you can call out one on it over the other. I mean, after all, you'd have to include the little lobster Newburg and Iranian caviar snacks Obama and Michelle have been enjoying lately.
1 person likes this
@piasabird (1737)
• United States
22 Oct 08
I find that believable. She's so cheap. They only give 1% to charity and only began to give 6% after he started running for president. He has a half brother in Kenya who lives in a shack in a slum on a dollar a month and he doesn't even send him a dime!
2 people like this
• United States
22 Oct 08
"He has a half brother in Kenya who lives in a shack in a slum on a dollar a month and he doesn't even send him a dime!" http://clarusvisum.blogspot.com/2008/10/george-obama-live-well.html
2 people like this
@philjas (1134)
• United States
22 Oct 08
Obama is reported to give money directly to people, like the people he heard about on the campaign trail who didn't have enough money to buy food for the weekend because they wouldn't get a paycheck until Monday, so Barack used his personal credit card to buy enough food for them to get them through the weekend - or a woman he met at an airport who needed $150 to get back home and he gave it to her, and that was when he was just out of college and long before he started running for public office. There are more ways to help people than just writing tax-deductible checks to charities.
2 people like this
@ZephyrSun (7381)
• United States
22 Oct 08
I didn't know that the parties did that for a candidate and family. Seems strange that they could use campaign donations to buy clothes. I think I'll go set up my own political party and you can be my VP and we will go on a shopping spree with donations because we need to have really expensive opps I mean nice clothes lol I don't know if the party picked out her skirts but I wish they would have sent Cindy with her because she knows how to dress and I haven't been impressed with Palin's attire.
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Oct 08
Zeph, I could really use that shopping spree! As far as taking Cindy with her, while $150,000 is a fortune to spend on clothes for us I think it may be slumming it for Cindy if what I read and heard was true. Reportedly her RNC Convention outfit cost over $300,000, or something like that! Imagine having to get SEVERAL outfits for a mere $150,000...lol! Annie
2 people like this
@devylan (695)
• United States
23 Oct 08
Oh, I'm sure the campaign picked everything. She's much more stylish looking now than she was at the beginning, wouldn't you say? Apparently, they made a statement that they had always intended on giving the wardrobe away to charity. Who knows if this is the truth or not. I can only assume, though, that the DNC would do the same for Obama/Biden if they needed to look more fashionable, right? Who knows. I don't care if my President and Vice President is wearing blue jeans and t-shirts, as long as their doing their jobs in the best possible way.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
30 Oct 08
AMEN!! Annie
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
31 Oct 08
*smiles*
• United States
22 Oct 08
They did the same thing for Obama, his wife and his daughters. If it is a public function for the election than the campaign pays for it. All those traveling pant suits for Hilary were the same way. All the campaigns do it. It does not make sense to me but they all do it. When the Clintons campaigned with Chelsea when she was little, the campaign paid for her clothes too. Just like whoever gets elected gets haircuts paid for by the american public. I remember when it hit the news when the Clintons first got elected that their haircuts were hundreds of dollars a piece and Hilary's designer dress cost a small fortune. I do not know what happens to the clothes afterwards but I would imagine they all get the keep them. It is not like they can be returned to the store.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Oct 08
Actually they did NOT do the same for Obama or his family. There have been no such expenditures reported by the DNC. I've never heard of it being done in the past for any candidate but I could be wrong. Once they're elected it's a different story possibly but I don't think their clothes are paid for by the parties. I think there is a hair stylist at the White House but I suppose that makes some sense since it's not like the First Lady can just walk into the corner salon and get her hair done before a state dinner. Annie
• United States
28 Oct 08
It has come out she does not get to keep the clothes. The RNC will probly do a charity auction or something with them once the election is over. Or they will auction them and then put the money back to replace what they spent.
1 person likes this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
23 Oct 08
I'm pretty sure there was a stylist in their somewhere. (They even supplied a suit for her hubby.) Those right wingers were so unhinged by the electricity generated by Hillary and Obama in the primary that they went out and tried to invent their own superstar. They totally ignored the fact that the two Dems were well educated, smart and articulate and chose a candidate that was the triumph of style over substence. Now it appears that the style was bought and paid for by the RNC and wasn't even the candidate's own. I fear that Sarah & her clan have acquired too much of a taste for the high life and will probably not want to gracefully give up their fifteen minutes of fame when Obama wins in November. This could present a problem. Even the most star struck Republicans aren't going to want to pay for their good life then. i predict a short, sweet career in reality TV for Saran & clan. LOL
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
22 Oct 08
So much for fiscal responsibility huh? I've seen a few people rag on Michelle Obama here for the way she dresses, but at least she is more in tune. I can't say that I agree with the $700 dress she wore to the Dem convention, that seems pricey to me, but it pales in comparison to the $3500 outfit that Palin wore, and lets not even bring up Cindy McCain. I was also a litlle miffed to find out that $295 was spent for baby Palin at a high end baby store in Minneapolis during the Republican convention. What could that kid possibly have needed that they couldn't get at Target or Walmart? I'm sure she'll get to keep the clothes, from what I hear Neiman Marcus has a strict return policy. But seriously, I heard about the $150K spent to make her look good, and all I could think is that is more than hubby and I make in 3 years. Just shows where the priorities are. I'm not saying she needs to shop at Walmart, but Sears has nice clothes too.
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Oct 08
Like I said in a comment below - this was paid for by the campaign, and honestly? I think it's a total non-issue. The RNC says that the clothing will be contributed to charity - and I know of several charities that solicit high-end business suits and other clothing to be given to women and men re-entering the work force who need decent interview clothing. Even better, perhaps they're planning to auction them off and donate the proceeds to charity. But again, honestly, I don't really care how much they spent on clothes for Sarah and her family. The one thing I might question is the judgment of the party that it was an appropriate use of campaign funds - but as far as it reflecting on Sarah Palin? Eh. Like I said -- if someone offered to buy me and my kids nice clothes, I wouldn't turn it down.
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
22 Oct 08
As soon as I saw this story I knew someone would post it here. It's amazing how people are now nitpicking things that have been common practice in politics for a long time. Have you forgotten things like the image makeover done for Al Gore during his 2000 presidential campaign? An article can just say "We found no similar spending by Obama", but if that's the case then why aren't they providing us with their actual spending? I really just want to know how is this relevant to anything? In campaigns expenditures are always ridiculous.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Oct 08
How is it relevant? How about her folksy talk to make us think she's just like us? Spending $150,000 for a few black skirts and jackets isn't like me or anyone else I know. I know you're going to disagree, Taskr, but I have no doubt that if there were even a small fraction of that amount spend by the DNC or the Obama campaign for Michelle's clothes and make-up it would be all over the place and would be used as "proof" of their "elitism". Annie
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
23 Oct 08
Once again we're going to have to agree to disagree. I don't know what news channels you watch but I sure haven't seen any free ride by Obama but there sure has been a lot about McCain the media never even touched on at all. I'll agree he's not quite the media darling he used to be recently but they really had no choice but to cover some of his flip-flops and gaffes. I know you think poor Sarah has been demonized by the evil liberal media but I don't see how. She refused to give interviews at first and has yet to have a press conference. When she did get interviews even you have to admit she did quite poorly, and I'm trying to be polite here. I know you'd prefer it legitimate stories about her such as her refusal to release her medical records, the $150,000 spent on clothes for her by the RNC, the new report of her charging Alaskan taxpayers for her children's travel expenses and all news concerning the trooper gate investigation and findings to be ignored or totally overlooked but if that happened the media wouldn't be worth a thing. She was a virtual unknown until two months ago so sure they sent reporters to Alaska to see what they could learn about her as they would about anyone else. I can't imagine anyone getting a pass on her obvious misinformation about what the V.P. is allowed to do with the Senate. My sixth grade granddaughter heard about that question and Palin's answer and she thought it was funny since she's already learned that part of the U.S. Constitution and she said, and these were her exact words, "I can't believe she thinks she can go to the Senate and change their policies. She can break a tie, that's all!" Very serious words from my 11 going on 35 Angela Renee! Annie
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
23 Oct 08
"I have no doubt that if there were even a small fraction of that amount spend by the DNC or the Obama campaign for Michelle's clothes and make-up it would be all over the place and would be used as "proof" of their "elitism"." Annie, you just love to pretend that the media attacks Obama the same way they do Palin, but it just doesn't happen. They aren't talking about the fact that he gave a doctors note from 2007 instead of a medical history like McCain. They aren't talking about how little he and Biden give to charity. The media gives Obama a free ride and if you weren't so ridiculously biased you'd realize that. As far as the right goes, just take a look at the elitist accusations. Obama's money and his spending habits haven't been brought up at all. It's all been about his and his wife's behavior.
• United States
22 Oct 08
The RNC paid for the clothing, and has reportedly responded that after the campaign the clothes will be contributed to charity. Frankly, I don't care, and if anything, it makes me -like- Sarah Palin a little bit more and makes her just a little more human to me. Seriously, folks, think about this - if someone came up to you and said, "Okay, you'll be representing us so we want you to look good. Here's a credit card, let's go shopping and get you some decent clothes" - you'd say no? I wouldn't.
1 person likes this