FEMA Blames Residents For Toxic Trailers

Your very welcome. Personally, I don't trust FEMA to not run you over while parked at a red light.

I went on two dates with someone on an executive level of FEMA. I can say honestly, that when I met him, he was very charming. A few dates later, and meeting his work friends, I needed a shower to remove the slimeyness. The callousness that prevails in government assistance programs extends to the personnel's personal lives. All he did was complain about the "trashy people that were using the system because of disasters". We even got into a heated argument regarding my own FEMA claim denial and subsequent hearings. All in all, it's a good thing the discussions in Congress about shutting down FEMA and making a different group. Though I'm pretty sure they will just hire all the old FEMA people back. LOL

FEMA-FILTH. I wonder if there's gonna be a new icky with the FEMA label. I can understand you wanting a shower. Sorry, but my weird sense of humor is peeking at FEMA slime.

I think if a resident of a trailer has a baby that gets sick, (one baby in this news story suffered a bloody nose severe enough for hospitalization) FEMA should step in and move that resident to a non-toxic residence for the sake of public relations if nothing else. Instead FEMA said moving is on the nonexistent dime of the refugees...to hell with the baby.

The question is are there any available shelters in these areas?

All I'm saying is that yes, FEMA should have taken care of it sooner but at the same time if my baby was having nosebleeds severe enough to require hospital care, and I knew it was b/c of a problem with the trailer, I'd move...if I had to move out and stay in a shelter till I could find a place. I wouldn't just sit there letting my baby get sicker every day, just like if I had severe allergies as one man said he had...I wouldn't just sit there doing nothing. [b]~~IN SEARCH OF PEACE WITHIN~~ **AGAINST THE STORMS, I WILL STAND STRONG**[/b]