Is Obama the anti-christ?
By tdavis
@tdavis (117)
United States
October 27, 2008 9:37am CST
Just looking at the surface of this question it would appear to be a yes, depending on several other factors. First, if the Demo's get a super majority in the house and senate. If Obama is elected president and is able to stack the court with like minded individuals that will legislate from the bench, he may fit the bill. Socialization of the United States and the world would begin, and the issue of a one world goverment will be put forward. Obama has made a dramatic rise into power, and is still an unknown. Europe, Germany, France and numerous other countries see him as the American to make the United States subserviant to world interests. The ground work has been laid with the Eurpoean union and the union of American states or the Amero union with canada, america (usa) and mexico. Has gotten americans use to the idea of globalization, the united nations will either step in or will be reorganized to fill the role of a legislative body for the new world order. Bush the first began using that phrase, and it was chilling to me, but after 12 years of hearing it, it has lost its shock value and has gotten us use to the term and the idea. All of you religious scholars and political junkies, lets hear your expert opinion regarding this idea.
1 person likes this
5 responses
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
27 Oct 08
First of all, the idea of the Amero has been floated around forever. It's not going to happen. I know quite a few Europeans, and not one of them have said they feel he would make America subserviant to world interests. The fact of the matter is foreign governments like him because he is clear headed, even tempered, open minded and willing to listen.
Every president is able to "stack the bench" with like minded individuals. This has been going on for quite a long time also.
My question for you is if a Republican does things to help the people why is it called reform, but if a Democrat says similar things it is called socialization?
There will be no new world order, I highly doubt many countries would jump on board that train, and the world is too diverse for such an idea to even work.
@tdavis (117)
• United States
27 Oct 08
This is not merely a democratic issue, republicans have been doing their fair share, NAFTA, Illegal entry into us, and getting the un's permission before taking actions to protect american interests. Bush W, like his father is setting the state for a world goverment, there is no true rep. in sight. Clear headed, even tempered, open minded and willing to listen, sounds like a team player to me. Team players in goverment does not mean doing whats right, it means getting along.
I was a demo. for a long time until they moved away from me. Dems use to be for small goverment and individual rights and freedoms. The repbs moved into the area of my basic beliefs, and they too have come and gone. Small goverment, low taxes, less red tape and hoops, get out of my way, let me work if I make more, I keep more. Americans use to value fairness and freedoms. Taxing anyone more because because they make more is just wrong. God only asks for 10%, why does the goverment need 50%?
It was once believed that a united europe, with the same currancy, and without boarders, would never happen. Many did not believe it would happen in the America's, but we are getting closer and closer.
1 person likes this
@soccermom (3198)
• United States
27 Oct 08
Europe went to the Euro, but last time I checked each country still retained it's own border.
I also realize that this is a bi partisan problem, however when you use discussion topics such as the one you did, expect people to think it has to do with the Democratic party.
As far as your team player theory, I understand where you are coming from, but I can't say that I agree.
@mcat19 (1357)
• United States
27 Oct 08
It is unfortunate that you let the opinion of a few rightwing nutjobs who would say anything to defeat Obama sway you in this way. We are far from an anti-Christ. This is propaganda in the worst sense of the term. Just dismiss this from your mind. I know other wingnuts who have said that Bush was the anti-Christ. These people are not to be believed either. Just breathe.
@tdavis (117)
• United States
27 Oct 08
What is a wingnut? I thought Obama was for bring everyone together? In your view can I not express my views without name calling? Your argument might have merrit, slang terms are non specific and do not promote understanding or communications. Instead of dismissing it, give specific, articulate counterpoints to the view you disagree with.
1 person likes this
@goldeneagle (6745)
• United States
27 Oct 08
He certainly fits the bill...also if you read the writings of Nostradamus, it is predicted that "Hussein" will be part of a great world war. Everyone used to take it for granted that Nostradamus was referring to Saddam Hussein. However, now I am not so sure. I am not sure one way or the other, but Obama could very well be. I just have that feeling. I hope I am totally wrong about him, because it appears that Obama is going to win the election, but I just can't seem to shake the bad feelings I have about him...
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
27 Oct 08
Hi T and welcome to Mylot.
This has been batted around before a couple of times. No, Barack Obama is not the anti-Christ and the Amero union will not happen. Regardless of who is in power the people of the United States will not stand for it...we will stand against it...and, so, it will not become a reality. Don't live in fear...don't believe that this nation is not great and that the people who live here are powerless. We are not.
