What do you think Clinton, Palin and Pelosi have done for women in politics?

United States
November 1, 2008 10:48pm CST
Have they changed the playing field so that more women are going going to be able to go after some of the top political offices in this country? Do you think they were fairly treated by the press? Is sexism still a problem? Or do you think this shows that women are now equal to men when it comes to our top elected offices?
4 people like this
4 responses
@relundad (2310)
• United States
2 Nov 08
I think that Palin's name should not even be mentioned with Clinton and Pelosi. Sexism is still a problem, and will probally always be a problem as will racism, but thats life as we know it. Despite both racism and sexism there are the select few of us that will rise above that and be judged by what we know and not the color of our skin or the gender for which we were born.
3 people like this
• United States
2 Nov 08
The reason I brought up Palin is because she is running for VP and because CNN and other new organizations made a big deal about her having younge kids. Does that mean all moms with little kids can not have a career or challenging jobs? It kinda surprised me that they went after her on that one when they had things like actual political issues and job experience they could have talked about but they zeroed in on that one for a while then moved on to the rest. It makes me wonder if the rest of our society thinks you can't be mom AND have a career. Kind of demeaning to every working mom out there.
3 people like this
@relundad (2310)
• United States
2 Nov 08
Well it depends on who you ask, for some its the golden reason that she should be VP. When for me it matters not. In a earlier discussion the poster said that her connection was the fact that she was a mother to a disabled child. My question to her was are you looking for a personal friend or someone capable of running this country?
3 people like this
• United States
2 Nov 08
How would being a mom make her unable to do her job? I think it is fine to say you think not think she is qualified for the job because of experience or do you not want her to win because you do not like her stance on the issues. But I do think it is dangerous ground to judge a female candidates worthiness for a job on wether or not she has small kids. What about every working mom out htere? Should htey be judged by that? Of course not. Neither should she. But the press did it.
3 people like this
@redhotpogo (4398)
• United States
2 Nov 08
Clinton, Palin, and Condaleezza Rice, I would say have done a great deal. Mostly Rice though. Clinton is sorta just riding along on the success of Bill, and Palin doesn't really have much success, other than alaska. I know that's big to some people, but come on...alaska? shutup. Pelosi doesn't deserve to be mentioned with any of these women. Pelosi is a joke. She's like the woman you give a little bit of responsibilty, that gets a power trip, and thinks she runs everything. Get off the tv, and shutup. Sheeesh. You'ld think she was the frikin president. Someone turn her mic off. With her little flying monkey Reed.
2 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
2 Nov 08
I take it you don't like Nancy Pelosi...lol? Seriously, though, you and many others may not like her and some disagree with her politics, but it really is a big deal that she's the first female Speaker of the House. I don't think she's ever given any more of an impression of being on a "power trip" than any other Speaker I've seen in my lifetime. Remember Newt Gingrich? Annie
2 people like this
• United States
2 Nov 08
I agree. Like her or not. It is a big deal that she is Speaker of the house. She is the first woman who has held that position and hopefully that chances the playing field for all women in politics.
2 people like this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
2 Nov 08
I think Hillary Clinton has greatly advanced the cause of woman in politics. Nancy Pelosi, although reviled by some, has come the closed so far to being a hearbeat away (two heartbeats actually). Sarah Palin dosen't even deserve mention for anything except setting woman back. This is just my opinion but I have always given credit where credit was due. Women of achievement in politics have a long history of excellence whether liberal (Geraldine Ferraro, Hillary Clinton, Shirley Chisolm ) or conservative (Clare Boothe Luce, Margaret Chase Smith). Not until Sarah Palin have I ever doubted the right of a female super achiever on either side to be in the spotlight based on her intelligence and achievement. To see the likes of Sarh Palin riding on the coattails of women who so outclass her has been painful.
@mehale (2200)
• United States
2 Nov 08
In many ways the accomplishments of these women have given women in general a better image and done wonders for our ability to hold positions of power. Unfortunately, we still have a long way to go. There are still many Americans out there that dislike women candidates simply because they are women, just as there are the voters that dislike Obama just because of his race. We still have a long way to go to beat both sexism and racism. We are finally on the right track, though!
1 person likes this