Here We Go Again! ! Different rights for different people!

Tweet

Last year I posted a discussion about a Muslim woman who was fired from a Security Company because she altered her uniform. She made herself a skirt that touched the floor instead of wearing the regulation knee length skirt. She took her complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission. Now there is another situation. Eight female employees at UPS who got fired because they failed to adhere to company dress code launched a complaint. They worked at a UPS warehouse and because they had to climb ladders often 6 feet high to stack or retrieve packages they wore pants and if they wished a knee length skirt over top. The women insisted on wearing floor length skirts which UPS considered a safety hazard because they could easily trip over them going up and down the ladders. The Human Rights Tribunal is already hearing this issue for two weeks at taxpayer’s expense. The ladies claim that it is possible to see the shape of their lower legs wearing pants and short skirts. Ever heard of baggy pants? These women all belong to the same mosque. This mosque preaches strict adherence to sharia and no compromise with the West. Teachings found at khalidmosque.com preach such things as: Islamic Guidelines to Women: "The enemies of Islam know the importance of Hijab and the value of remaining at home. They therefore vehemently attack Hijab (The head covering for women)...They hate Islam and us. They wish to our demise and downfall." Save the women: "Once a Muslim woman becomes introduced to the wickedness of Western ideology and concepts she becomes fixated on trying to appear and act like her "role models" of corruption." What is the Islamic position on female circumcision? "It is an honour for women but not obligatory" Is it permitted for a Muslim woman to pierce her nose? "It serves no purpose and causes pain and mutilation." www.khalidmosque.com Note on the above: In certain countries little girls are dragged to an old woman who performs the female circumcision with an unsanitary knife. That is not mutilation? That does not cause pain? On the website there are also derogatory remarks about Jews. My question is: Should organizations that complain of violation of religious and human rights while denouncing other faiths and ways of life have the right to be heard by Human Rights Tribunals?