Page by Page and Line by Line

@newtondak (3946)
United States
November 25, 2008 12:08pm CST
"President-elect Barack Obama pledged Tuesday to go through the federal budget "page by page, line by line" to eliminate excessive spending and get the economy back on track." I believe we heard this before - only not from Obama. This was actually a part of McCain's campaign - except that he also indicated that he would reveal the parties responsible for implementing the aforesaid excessive spending.
2 responses
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
25 Nov 08
That is indeed true. However, at this point I don't care who does it as long as it gets done and somebody really puts an end to the wasteful spending. Unfortunately, it's probably mostly talk again. I'm not holding my breath that anything really gets done.
1 person likes this
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
25 Nov 08
It might happen until he steps on the toes of someone important - then it will just get lip service.
• United States
26 Nov 08
Actually, Obama did say exactly that during the campaign. McCain said that he'd blanket veto any "porkbarrel spending". Obama said that he'd go through the budget line by line, check programs to see what's working and what's not working, and eliminate programs and appropriations for programs that are wasteful, or just aren't working. Part of the reason that I supported Obama over McCain is that that approach makes a lot more sense to me than a blanket promise to veto any earmarked spending whatsoever - that's an approach that's sure to throw out the baby with the bathwater - and doesn't necessarily eliminate government waste in established programs. If you're interested, newtondak, drop me a private message and after I get things settled with my internet access (I have heat back and I get to stay in my current apartment yay!), I'll send you the xls file I have of every earmark request submitted by Obama in his tenure as a US senator. They're an interesting study in how earmarks can work, not only for the region affected, but to the benefit of much larger areas.
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
26 Nov 08
It will be interesting to see just what is cut and what is not. Obama chose not to accept public funding for his campaign, taking millions of dollars from the American public instead of staying within those limits. He also formed a not-for-profit organization to accept contributions for his transition team instead of sticking to the amount allowed by Congress. These are not good indications of his ability to stick to a budget or to minimize spending. He is bound to loose some support from the farm community as he originally supported farm and ethanol subsidies to get the agricultural vote, but has since said that he is in favor of cutting them.