In Obama's own words... we don't need him.

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
November 26, 2008 11:48am CST
“What we don’t need is the same old people doing the same old things in the same old ways.” ~Barack Obama. Sen. Obama said this when he was on the campaign trail in Idaho. So far his cabinet is exactly what he describes here... the "same old people". Today he stammered and stuttered through an embarrassing response when questioned on the subject. In fairness, he did say one thing that is true, and describes what the Obama administration is shaping up to be... "The walls of the echo chamber can sometimes keep out fresh voices and new ways of thinking," Obama said. "You start engaging in group-think." Obama is nothing more than a group think Democrat who has no interest in "change" or the best person for the job. All his lies and deceit aside, if you don't have a D after your name and didn't work in a previous democrat administration, you need not apply. It's hilarious but telling that Prs. Bush had more diversity in his administration than this champion of "diversity" even hopes for. Lies are all Obama has.... and all he is.
5 people like this
13 responses
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
28 Nov 08
sorry to hear such negativeness. It does no good at all. I think for me...colin powell jumping from republican to demacrat said it all. He may be one of the older guys but he is very much respected as a politician and a man. And he did not have D next to his name. Since it is a done deal...why don't we at least give the man a chance...he isn't even in office yet for c sakes! If he sat there & did nothing at all but talk pretty...he still could not do worse than Bush.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Nov 08
I am giving him a chance, and have written articles that do so. But giving him a chance does NOT include being blind to his lies.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
29 Nov 08
I know he can't do all that he promised, or even hopes to do... he's not a dictator. However, some of his lies have already been exposed on things he had 100% control over. Yes, politicians lie, but that is their choice, accepting their lies is our choice. If we just get lazy and not expose the lies when we can, then we are no better than they are.
2 people like this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
29 Nov 08
I agree that we can not be blinded. Personally, I think they all have their own personal agenda and are liars. I have yet to meet one that is completely honest. Some are just worse than others. As for Obama, He was not the one that I really hoped to see win. The person I was rooting for dropped out of the running. Since he got the job, I just hope that he can do something good for our country. I don't believe he can possibly do all that he's promised.
2 people like this
@mikeysmom (2088)
• United States
27 Nov 08
the thought has occurred to me to and i hope we are wrong though as we need change so very badly in this country. the old way is just not working. i did not vote for him but would like to see him succeed because if he does all he said he was going to do it will very good for the middle class for a change. let's see what happens in the months ahead.
2 people like this
• United States
27 Nov 08
There will always be back biters..and no doubt from the opposition party.. Had your candidate gotten in; I am sure MR. Obama would not be the subject of all your Mylot topics.. I think you are just jealous that someone neat clean and afro american is going to rule our country. I like Mr. Obama and I don't appreciate all the bad things you are saying about him.
• United States
27 Nov 08
I am not racist but your own words have really betrayed you.. I supported President Bush and never spoke against him..even when some friends or family..said I think this ..about the President..I didn't disgrace him or belittle him..out of respect for the office He holds As mean as you are to Mr. OBama..so you are to me..You have a lot of hatred and cruel words inside you .. If you must use them...go ahead use them on me..but please respect the office of our COmmander in Chief..both for him who leaves and for him who enters.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Nov 08
I was just returning what you threw at me.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Nov 08
I have said from the beginning that I will support Obama when he does things I agree with and oppose him when he does things I disagree with. I did that with Bush and I never liked McCain at all, but I would have done it with him too. Your words show your complete hatred for the US, freedom and what the US stands for. Our president doesnt' RULE you mindless freak. Our president is ONE of many in the federal government who have obligations and responsibilities. Who cares if he is Black or whatever, so far he has done nothing but betray the promises he made on the campaign trail, so it is only right that we should call him on them. Prs. Elect Obama will be the next president. He earned that privilege through a great campaign and gaining the number of electoral votes necessary to win. For that I congratulate him and pray for nothing but health, happiness and success for him, his family and his administration. I hope his girls enjoy all the unique opportunities that only come to "1st kids" by virtue of being in the president's family. I hope they learn a lot and don't take a second for granted. If you want to be a blind little racist pig that is your right, but leave me out of it.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
28 Nov 08
"The same old people" to most of the voters means the same people who have been in charge the past eight years. "Change" means change from the failed policies of the past eight years. I understand and respect that those of you on the right disagree and either think Bush hasn't been that bad or that the problems we've had have been no fault of his, probably instead the fault of the slim Democratic majority in Congress the past two years but apparently the majority of the voters disagree with that assessment. It seems that anyone who didn't support Obama thinks he should appoint as many or more Republicans than Democrats to his cabinet and other positions but the voters have been pretty clear about what they think of Republicans in general. Even though Gates is staying on as Secretary of Defense and Jim Jones, a staunch McCain supporter, is likely to be part of the Administration, that isn't enough. Those of us who didn't support Bush had to deal with the first six years of his Presidency where Democrats in the Senate and the House were basically silenced. Anyone who dared to disagree with the Administration on anything was called unpatriotic and anti-American. When Bush was reelected in 2004 he boasted of the political capital he'd won and how he intended to spend it. Obama won far more political capital but hasn't once shown that type of arrogance. I was really hoping people would at least wait until Obama took office to start complaining about his every move. I have no problem with anyone expressing their disagreement or displeasure, I spoke my mind these past few years, but can't people at least give him a chance? I don't think I heard or read of a single person criticizing Bush for not appointing a single Democrat despite his slim margins of victory. The nation obviously no longer leans to the right. Annie
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
28 Nov 08
Apparently to you history only goes back to the beginning of the Bush administration. Just once I'd like to see some of that objectivity I used to see in you Annie. You follow Obama like a love sick puppy.
1 person likes this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
3 Dec 08
Thank you, Devylan, that's how I see it and it's how most of the people I know see it. I certainly only know a tiny number of people, relatively speaking, but I don't think they're so different from the majority of the rest of the people in this country. History obviously goes well beyond the Bush Presidency, but unfortunately that's what's in our memories right now. Also, Ted, there really is something between blindly following everything Obama does not matter what and saying he's a liar. Annie
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
2 Dec 08
No, Ted, I have to disagree. Within the context of the campaign, Obama was only speaking of the past eight years. Annie is not saying that that is all there is, just that that is what the context of this discussion is about.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Nov 08
HE is doing exactly what he critized Hilary for. He said she would put the same old people in the white house. He was going to "change that". Well he didn't. He did the same thing he accused and critized Hilary for. He also said "there will be no room in MY white house for Lobbyist". Yet he has appointed people with strong lobbyist ties and in some cases lobbyist themelves. All the "change" is not happening. Anyone can see that.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
26 Nov 08
Exactly, so far it wouldn't have made any difference if Hillary or Obama had won.
1 person likes this
• United States
27 Nov 08
LOL! He also supposedly decided to run against Hillary because he felt she didn't have a good foreign policy plan. But then he turns around and puts her in the position of Secretary of State!!! Where she will run his foreign policy!!!??? I'm encouraged a bit that he is supposedly appointing centrists rather than leftists, and he is keeping Defense Chief Gates. Trying to hope against hope that we are giong to be OK. But it is weird that he appoints all these same people. I heard someone point out that Bill Clinton was the only democratic president in the last 30 years or so, and that's all Obama has to draw on if he wants experienced people, which he definitely NEEDS But why not get a couple of experienced Republicans or Independents, to round it out the way he said he was going to do. I hope it means he is not going extreme left as he has in the past. But it seems it will give him a lot of trouble -- are these people loyal to him, themselves, or to Hillary and Bill? Who's really going to be in charge there?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Nov 08
Good point! How can he say she isn't strong in foreign policy, and that he will appoint the best people for the job.. if he then appoints her to the position he things she is weak in? lol
1 person likes this
@murderistic (2278)
• United States
26 Nov 08
First everyone is afraid that he is going to make radical and socialist changes.... now everyone is complaining because he is choosing experienced people for his administration. I really don't get it. You should be happy that he isn't making the radical changes you feared.
1 person likes this
• United States
27 Nov 08
BUt he is not keeping his campaign promises. He has not even been sworn in yet and already he is going back on the things that people voted for him on.
• United States
27 Nov 08
And if any other candidate had won, they would be doing the same thing. Welcome to politics.
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
2 Dec 08
Finally, some enlightenment. Thank you, Murderistic.
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
26 Nov 08
When I looked at what Obama choose for his cabinet they were all pro abortion, pro same gender, and pro kill the oil and gas industry so America goes back to the stone age. I am beginning to believe that he really is not an American born citizen and his intent was to bring America down to ruin and the Democrats knew all this, but voted him in to ruin America and the Republican party.
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
28 Nov 08
Only a handful of cabinet appointments have even been announced and I don't see what any of them have to do with the abortion or gay marriage issues whatsoever. The Republicans have ruined themselves and the majority of Americans have voted to take their country back. Annie
1 person likes this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
26 Nov 08
That's unpossible! The messiah NEVER lies! Take it back now or MSNBC will have an army of reporters camped out on your lawn with every liberal government employee digging into your DMV, child support, military, criminal history, and any pet ownership in your past. Those who doubt or question the messiah shall be dealt with accordingly!
@newtondak (3946)
• United States
27 Nov 08
I would definitely feel better about him if he would move away from the "lawyer-speak" and answer questions directly with plain old common English. It reminds me of that song on "The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas" where the politician sings - "Ohhh, I love to dance a little sidestep...."
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Nov 08
Me too. He had the chance to answer the question like a man... but chose to be a coward isntead.
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
26 Nov 08
Lol, it's so true. Of course the economy and Bush are to blame;) He'll always have an excuse ready. And he'll always find people to defend him. Eloquent and slick. Quite frankly, I don't care if he doesn't go through with his big change promise and it's just the same old people again from Clinton time. I don't care about diversity in all the positions... I care about whether or not he will take care of the economic crisis in a proper manner. I care about whether or not all the money will just be handed to the big shots and us small people will be left to fend for ourselves. I care about whether he embarrasses us in front of the rest of the world. And I will care, if he takes away some of our freedoms. As of now, same old same old is not working. Handing money to the big shots is not working... yet Obama's economic plans seem to be just a continuation of that. So what he asked the big three to come with a plan first ridiculing them that they didn't do so to begin with. If this is all they learned from freely handing out the bank bailout money, then we have a big time problem. Okay, getting off my soapbox now.
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
2 Dec 08
Actually, I just heard on NPR the other morning that he's putting his political views aside and picking people with the most experience, whether they're Republican or Democrat.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Dec 08
In other words, he never had any intention of changing politics as usual. The whole "change" crap was just a lie.
1 person likes this
@devylan (695)
• United States
3 Dec 08
Eh, I guess I just never expect politicians to be anything but politicians. To me, he was saying that he would make things different than they have been for the past eight years, but I'm not going to reiterate what I already stated in reference to another response further up on the thread.
1 person likes this
@tobepure (187)
• China
27 Nov 08
wow,things seem complicated here!but i think Obama do will take change into the White House.or he will lose the standpoint he live on!
1 person likes this
• United States
27 Nov 08
Are you really that surprised? He's a politician, politicians lie. But isn't it wonderful that the United States has become open-minded enough to elect a black man as a president?!? I'm serious, we've come a long way. It didn't matter who was elected, things were not going to "change". It's all about "them" ruling "us" and "us" paying "them" bills. At least Obama sugar coats things and will give us a reach-around. Happy Thanksgiving and... Happy MyLotting!
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Nov 08
If the Black man is a waste of human flesh, no it isn't wonderful at all.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
27 Nov 08
Yes, it would have been great to have a president who is an honest person, who happens to be Black. btw, was McCain being honest when he was in the Keating 5? Is he being honest when he blocks attempts to answer POW/MIA questions? Was he being honest when he cheating on his first wife?
1 person likes this
• United States
27 Nov 08
It's wonderful that a black man can be elected, and that even a mixed race man (traditionally the most scorned by both races) can be elected. But would have been so nice to have elected a black man who stands for the US Constitution and everything it means. Would have been nice to have elected someone who would be truthful. I think politicians are not always to be trusted, for sure. But we really missed our chance to have a downright honest President, by not electing McCain. The one thing we would have always been sure about with McCain is that he was being truthful and that whether right or wrong, his intentions would have ALWAYS been for the best for our country. I really think we needed that desperately now, and we missed it for someone who so clearly never is truthful and always hides things.