Chemistry or stability?

@JenInTN (27514)
United States
November 30, 2008 9:13am CST
It would be great if we could have both but....when choosing a partner which determines your choice? I like stability but chemistry has been known to drive me.lol
2 people like this
6 responses
@sunil_008 (1269)
• India
17 May 09
Hi, i think it needs more than the chemistry to pass the test.you need to see the chemistry to go on and on and on...you need physics to maintain.you need maths to be trouble free...you need biology to enjoy for all time to come...and with all these papers are in hand you will get the stability in relationship...:))
1 person likes this
@sunil_008 (1269)
• India
17 May 09
and of course i forgot the other two papers too. its history and geography required to chose from...lol
1 person likes this
@sunil_008 (1269)
• India
17 May 09
what else i need then...:)) thanks for liking my thinking ...
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
17 May 09
LOL..you seem to be on top of things when it comes to this subject. Nothing like a little research and a hypothesis to find the result..LOL..Thanks for the response. I like the way you think.
@zed_k4 (17589)
• Singapore
15 May 09
Hi there Jenin. I like this discussion here. If you ask me, I'd go for chemistry, of course. But I would understand if someone would want stability from me though. I believe that the two could be combined and the essence is to look for someone whom you can relate to, (chemistry for me) and whom is a responsible person. Once someone is responsible, the stability will fall into place and I believe the two can go hand in hand together.
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
15 May 09
Hi zed! It would be great to have both. I am a chemistry person too. It has a way of leading us at times. I think stability is also very important. Thanks for the input!
1 person likes this
@zed_k4 (17589)
• Singapore
16 May 09
It's my pleasure. I agree that chemistry is more appealing.
@zed_k4 (17589)
• Singapore
31 May 09
Thanks so much for the BR, Jenin...
@mimpi1911 (25464)
• India
15 May 09
I think, it would be stability over chemistry. While both are important, I would like to have a stable relationship that would overpower the chemistry with time. What use does chemistry come without stability? And having both is an out of the world combination which everyone of us would desire.
1 person likes this
@sid556 (30960)
• United States
16 May 09
Chemistry does it for me. Without it, things tend to get boring and go downhill mighty fast so there goes the stability factor.
1 person likes this
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
16 May 09
LOL...sounds like me. I want my cake and eat it too. I want them both..lol..Thanks for responding.
• Philippines
16 May 09
I choose chemistry... this is where a relationship starts. right? while if you are only having stability in a relationship... well for me.. i tend to get bored, then when you are bored and no more chemistry.. why are you still riding that ride? no more thrill... but then again if you love that person when the chimistry is gone... you would like to bring it back and hold on to stability! hahahah! but still I want chemistry coz this will keep me going
1 person likes this
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
17 May 09
I like chemistry too. i don't think I could be with someone if I didn't have that. I like the thought of having them both. Thanks for the response.
@modstar (9605)
• Philippines
16 May 09
Hmm.. this is difficult. I don't think a relationships can become stable if they don't have good chemistry. Chemistry is a vital agent in a relationship. Without it i don't think the relationship can be interesting at all. Stability without chemistry is like a job you keep doing but you hate it. If you ask me, then i guess i'd gamble and choose chemistry. It's what i'm looking for in a relationship. I want us to be on the same wavelenght.
1 person likes this