Are Unions losing all of their power?

@iriscot (1289)
United States
December 6, 2008 10:55am CST
I have a son who was the top bodyman at a Chevie dealership. The auto body shop and auto mechanics belonged to the same machinist union. The dealership was having financial problems and sold the dealership to another auto dealer. The new owner of the dealership never had an auto body shop at his other businesses and was going to eliminate the one in the dealership that he was purchasing. The workers and shop repair foreman lobbied to keep the body shop as they were the largest one in the area and were making a profit for the company. It was decided that they would give it a test run for 3 months and see how it worked out. They cut back some and let 2 workers go. The shop made money and there was a good profit received from the parts that were sold. The only catch was that the body shop was no longer going to be a union shop, although the mechanics would remain union. So the union representatives and lawyers got together to force the dealership to maintain the union in the body shop. After 2 months of negotiations the union reps failed and the body shop is no longer a union shop. My son needed to work two more years in the union to retire and receive full retirement benefits. As a result he will lose approximately $200 a month in retirement pay. So, I ask you are the unions losing all of their power, they did no good for my son.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@mlh8087 (368)
• United States
6 Dec 08
Personally, I feel the unions are the biggest waste of time. They only cause business to jack up prices so the outrageous wages they demand for their union members can be paid. Multiply that by however union members you have working for any given car company and that jacks up the price of a car to an amount no normal middle class person can afford. Yeah the unions are a big waste of time and money. Your person was paying union dues the whole while he was a member and what did the union do for him in a crunch. Nothing! The unions are in it for the money. I bet the people that run the unions are getting paid more than your guy.
1 person likes this
@iriscot (1289)
• United States
6 Dec 08
Don't get me wrong I'm not pro union, I've seen too many things in the past that has turned me off as far as they are concerned. I served as a City Commisioner for 12 years and I was on the negotiating committee for the city when the union contracts were up. Never once did the union people believe that they were making enough money or getting enough benefits. Negotiaions would go on for months and it didn't seem to matter to them how long it took because their increases were always retroactive to the last date of their contract.
• United States
26 Jun 10
Unions are the boil on the butt of humanity, they have made employers pay an outragous wage, and have lost by these companies becoming a little smarter and sending everything overseas. WOW, how can you lose by being union? alot!
@stinge (810)
• United States
7 Dec 08
I don't know much about unions. But I think they can only do but so much for the employees. When the company makes a decision, all the union does in my opinion is file grievances if they din't agree. I work for the post office. I have been ther for 10yrs. There are 3 shifts in my building. The morning afternoon and the nightshift. The mail volume has decreased ever since I started back in '98. And Just like every other company, the postal service has lost money every year. we currently have a no lay off clause in our contract. It protects the people like myself who have 10yrs in. They are currently in the process of getting rid of the morning shift. The people will be moved to the afternoon and nightshift. As a result, the junior clerks on these 2 shifts will be maoved to other facilities to make room for the senior clerks coming from the morning. I'm in ny, and they can send you as far as New Jersey. It has happened a few yrs ago allready. They excessed some 60 people and they got shipped off to new jersey because the volume of mail was low at my job. But now with the talks of not only getting rid of the morning shift, they are saying that the people who have 6yrs or less in the postal service are going to be let go. I don't know if that's the same for all the states. But my point is that the union can only do but so much. A few yrs ago I was placed on the list of junior clerks to be transferred to another facility out in new jersey. This was due to a drop in mail volume. And also, there were other facilities in the ny ares that close. Those employee's were sent to my building. On top of that you had people who's jobs were elimainated in certain parts of my building. You have people at my job who sort mail manualy, who are called manual clerks. And you have people like me who sort mail on the machines, which are automation clerks. They are slowly doing away with the manual section. So those people are being moved over to automation. All of the manual clerks are seniors, so as they get rid of those manual jobs, they have to keep excessing the junior clerks to make room for them. When the excess list came out a few yrs back, there were about 100 names on that list to be sent to new jersey. A few people like myself got lucky since most of the senior clerks opted to go to new jersey. Everyone at the time was saying "they can't get rid of all those people". And I say why not. When the numbers are down companies can do whatever they want. Now my so called union supposedly fought to keep those people from getting sent to new jersey, but it didn't work. So in my experience the union can only do so much. It sounds to me like in your discussion that they got rid of the body shop just so they could make even more money perhaps. Even though they made a profit, they wanted to pay as less people that they could. That's what I'm guessing. I think in these hard economic times, many companies will just be trying to eliminate as many employee salaries as they can just to save money. Even if it is a profit. Maybe these guys thought that the profit really wasn't worth it to keep all those employee's on the payroll.
1 person likes this
@iriscot (1289)
• United States
7 Dec 08
I can understand why they are cutting jobs in your industry. I personally, have relatives all over the U.S. I used to send letters by mail to them, now most all of them are on the internet and have email service, so we just email each other. I know the United Parcel Service has raised prices for their stamps quite a bit and your wage increase probably figured into the equation. It seems unfair that companies jockey employees around like they do, but I guess that won't stop until the economy gets turned around and business really picks up. I'm sorry to hear about your situation and hope that it will get better.
• United States
1 Apr 09
In My Town Unions has lost their Flair. All they do is picket places the already have people working their 1st. While listening to the local radio (Princeton) station ( The Local Marsails union)was saying the local Buiness was not local. The people from that union put up a big rat, and complaining they wanted that job, while the local business(es) were working. The Pizza shop did not get as many customers while the picketing was going on, the compamy kept up their job, and it looked like a big disgrace. The Unoin picketing looked like more they were crying for a job, they will never get, nor will the buisness will stop and hand over the contract. Thank goodness i never joined a Union, I will never want to cry over a contract i was never offered and picket a business that already had the work before me at all. their no good for small towns,and No Place for them even when they "Picket Cry" on the jobs they never had in the 1st place. They Lost my intrest when they keep picking on working people when thay can sign up for work, some place els the will Hire anyone on the spot.
• United States
7 Dec 08
The unions should take the current economic conditions as an opportunity to purchase the companies that are failing and run them as an employee owned entity. The unions have billions of dollars in pension funds to work with. If a company is worth saving then the unions should put their money where their mouth is.
@iriscot (1289)
• United States
7 Dec 08
You may have something there, I believe it has worked for a steel company in the east and may work for the auto industry. However, I wouldn't expect the union to do such a thing, it probably would have to come before the membership for a vote and I don't think the membership would want anyone tampering with their pension funds. I may be wrong.
• Alexandria, Virginia
6 Dec 08
You make some excellent points however when the three auto makers go by by and are in chapter 11 the unions will bye bye and the wages will go down dramatically and pensions will go bye bye Basically we headed for a depression that will be 20x worse than the great depression You w ill be lucky your son has a place to work and the lawyer may be deliver newspapers
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
6 Dec 08
Originally unions were a good thing in organizing the workers and pushing through better wages, benefits, and working conditions. Unfortunately they went way beyond that and yes, they are now losing power. Look what happened to the big 3 auto makers. The UAW could organize a strike that was able to completely stop productions and cause losses to the company in the millions. This way they pushed through some really unreasonable demands such as job banks. Whoever heard of getting paid for years for doing nothing? The employees had high wages and benefits even in times where the car makers were already suffering. It was cheaper to give in to the union rather than taking the losses of non-production. What happened to your son is bad but his retirement pay shouldn't have been bound to working in a union shop. Look at it this way, the guy could have simply shut down the place. But your son still has a job. If he couldn't have switched to a union body shop at the time his work place lost the union status, he probably also couldn't have switched to one, when the place would have been closed down. Then he would have been unemployed... What would have happened to his retirement pay then? Point is, the union went overboard and is a burden not only on employers but also on its own members. Fees, strike obligations, retirement benefits tied to working in a union shop... how fair is all of this to the union members? How well do the union bosses make out? People just start to have no understanding for union demands anymore, not even their own members. That is behind them losing their powers.
1 person likes this
@iriscot (1289)
• United States
6 Dec 08
I agree the unions are completely out of control. In the service we used to say "Don't sh** in your own helmet", well, it looks like they have managed to do just that. They will probably take down our auto industry unless there is some sort of bailout that will help save Chrysler, Ford and GM. It seems to me that the union workers have very little loyalty to the companies that have provided the money to feed, cloth and pay the rent or mortgage for their workers all of these years. My first post wasn't to defend the union it was just posted to show that they aren't what most workers believe they are. Most union leaders have been proven to have ties with the gangster element. That statement will probably draw a lot of fire from union personel. I remember during WWII the United Mine Workers went out on strike, having complete disregard of what the shortage of coal would cause to the operation of our defense factories. It was downright shameful.