Unbelievable!
By Marie Anne
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
United States
January 8, 2009 4:10am CST
I am absolutely appalled that such a thing could happen.
The article is copied below, but you can find it here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090107/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/army_apology
WASHINGTON – The Army said Wednesday that 7,000 family members of soldiers killed in the Iraq or Afghan wars mistakenly were sent letters addressing them as "John Doe." Army Chief of Staff Gen. George W. Casey, Jr., was sending a personal letter to all the families who received the improperly addressed letters as the result of a printing error, the Army said.
The 7,000 original letters were sent late last month to inform survivors about private organizations that offer gifts, programs and other assistance to families that have lost soldiers in Iraq or other countries where they are deployed for the war on terrorism.
It was sent from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command's Casualty and Mortuary Affairs Center in Alexandria, Va., which issued a formal apology Wednesday.
The letters, which were printed by a contractor, were to have been automatically addressed with the specific names and addresses of survivors, said Paul Boyce, an Army spokesman. Instead, they contained the placeholder greeting — "Dear John Doe."
"It's our fault for not catching it," he said. "We are certainly sorry."
Casey's personal note to the families alluded to the fact that he lost his own father in Vietnam and it said the Army is extremely sensitive to family grief.
An apology also was being posted on the human resources Web site, Boyce said.
"There are no words to adequately apologize for this mistake or for the hurt it may have caused," Brig. Gen. Reuben D. Jones, the Army adjutant general, said in the statement to be posted.
Boyce said all the other information in the letter regarding the assistance organizations was correct.
"It is important the original intent of the letter is not lost," Jones' statement said. "The organizations mentioned are dedicated to honoring loved ones and recognizing their sacrifice and commitment."
On the Net:
Army: http://www.army.mil
I served in the Marine Corps for more than 21 years. I've had a lot to do with casualty assistance calls and the needs of the families left behind.
My son also served three tours in Iraq, so I know only too well how frightening it is for a family to live with the ever-present fear of seeing that government vehicle pull into the driveway and a uniformed chaplain and commanding officer knock on their door.
These letters notifying the families of benefits and counseling available to them came much later and the information they contained was no doubt valuable to them, but a mistake of that magnitude is unconscionable. How that many letters went through so many hands and got mailed without the mistake being caught is beyond me.
I did free-lance work for a couple of years where I printed form letters that inserted the name and address from a data base during a mail-merge, so I know how it's done.
I worked for a while at a bulk mailing company where letters were folded by a machine, then stacked in another machine to be inserted into the envelopes. Yes, the process is automated, but people still handled those letters and stacked them into the machines.
It says the letters were mailed from an Army facility but were printed by a contractor. It's time to quit paying someone else to do our work. This project should have been handled by soldiers every step of the way; you can bet that such a grievous error would have been caught before reaching those poor families.
I am livid right now. The Army admits their responsibility, and I'm sure that's a great comfort to the families who saw their loved ones memory treated in such a callous manner.
Yea right ...
4 people like this
8 responses
@winterose (39887)
• Canada
9 Jan 09
since they were mass produced and Identical, nobody and you just needed one person to spot the error and that would be reading the name john doe, but that one person didn't see the error, and it went out, these things happens just it is awful but to err is human, that person who ever should have checked the letter before it went out will be reprimanded for a mistake of that magnitude. They issued an apology what else to you want them to do? They will never make a mistake like that again, this is a lesson for them, and they may even fire the employee on their end and the contracting company for this.
1 person likes this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
9 Jan 09
Have you served in the military?
Did you have a son or daughter in a war zone?
If you did, I think your response would be a bit different.

@dragon54u (31633)
• United States
8 Jan 09
That is horrible and inexcusable! Didn't anyone look at a sample letter as they were printing?! Doesn't anyone check their work anymore?! There's just no excuse for this. And why is is contracted out? I know the Army has competent secretarial staffs and they'd save money doing it themselves.
1 person likes this
@Ldyjarhead (10233)
• United States
8 Jan 09
I'm sure the basic letter was proofread, but with a mail-merge program the individual names would have been filled in automatically as they spit out of the printer. Apparently no one looked at a single individual letter after that process occurred.
That's what you get when you outsource and don't check things yourself. That was my point.
@ShepherdSpy (8544)
• Omagh, Northern Ireland
8 Jan 09
Talk about adding insult to injury..and it took them 7000 or so mailings before they got alerted to this SNAFU? The bereavements are obviously still recent and deeply felt by all of the families concerned..Having their Loved one referred to in an officially sourced letter as a "John Doe" is beyond insensitive,regardless of whoever they may blame for it...somebody did the programming,somebody didn't do checks as the letters came out...Were ALL the Letters ADDRESSED to the Deceased's Families correctly so that they got delivered ok,or did the merge foulup occur in the Address as well as in the letter? Someone before the mailroom should have noticed this way sooner...
1 person likes this
@koalatbs (2229)
• United States
9 Jan 09
That's absolutely awful Ldyjarhead! And, I completely agree with you that the letter definitely should NOT have been contracted out for printing. Letters of that nature are too sensitive to leave the job up to an outside company. I'm surprised that they didn't outsource the job to a printer in another country! That seems to be the "way" lately, don't you agree?!
@sxrxnrr45601 (1171)
• United States
9 Jan 09
I read this as well and I swear I almost cried just thinking how them families must have felt getting such a uncaring letter how could the goverment make such a bad mistake these are the men and women that have given the biggest sacafice there childern I just cant beleave such a thing has happend!!!!!!!!
1 person likes this
@onlydia (2808)
• United States
8 Jan 09
Oh my gosh that is just so wrong. I think of them families all the time and the things they must be going though as times are tough for me let alone a family that has lost someone to the war. I think if they used just the vets it never would of happened so yes I totaly agree with you on that. Your friend onlydia
1 person likes this
@CinderInMySoul (4717)
• United States
9 Jan 09
jeezu. even if the system is automated..they SHOULD be doing spot quality control checks if nothing else..and if more than 2 of those checks said "John Doe" it should have been verified.
HOW they could not have done at least 2 quality control checks while printing 7000 of the letters is just stupid!
thats got to be one of the biggest printing errors ive heard of...though im sure there are plenty of them out there. that type of letter though is IMPORTANT. man, how the hell could they have NOT done spot checks?!
@ANTIQUELADY (36440)
• United States
9 Jan 09
how very, very tacky. i don't think that kind of mistake is forgivable. those poor families, that had to be a big low blow to them.









