Closing GITMO: Popular But Dangerous!!
By rodney850
@rodney850 (2145)
United States
January 23, 2009 10:43am CST
President Obama announced yesterday that he would close the Guantanamo detention facility within a year. This action was welcomed by the anti-war, anti-Bush populus but do these people really realize what this really means?
With the closure of Gitmo comes two basic choices and those are; 1: bring all of the prisoners here to America and keep them in our cities and towns untill they can be tried... or 2: release them.
I don't know about anyone else but I really like the idea of suspected terrorists being incarcerated on an island where they pose no real threat as versus bringing them to the US where any number of their cohorts may be able to plan and execute an escape!
As far as letting them go....we all know where they will go when that happens or do we? Here is an example of what happens when a terrorist is released:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090123/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_yemen_al_qaida
1 person likes this
1 response
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
23 Jan 09
First, not every detainee at Gitmo was there because they were suspected terrorists picked up on american soil after 911. Many are prisoners of war captured by the US in Afghanistan and Iraq. They were subject to the accords of the Geneva convenntion (accords signed and ratified by the US) but they were denied those rights. Every human rights organization on earth including Amnesty International has accused the US of violations.
There is no intention to release these people within the continental US but the ones who have sufficient evidence against them will be brought to the US to stand trial where they will be granted legal representation. (One of the reasons Gitmo is on Cuban soil is because it allows the US to incarcerate people without charges and without any right to representation.)
I'm not certain what the numbers are on Guantanamo detainees but I belief at one time there were upwards of 700. At the present time there are 245. Many have already been returned their own countries or repatriated to other countries willing to take them.
Because of the anger of the world against the Bush administration for allowing the injustices at Gitmo, several countries such as Britain and Australia refused to help with repatriating the detainees. This morning, Britian has indicated that she will be willing to help the Obama administration find countries for those not brought to trial. Also, Portugal has asked the EU to begin taking in detainees.
Gitmo was a disgrace and it flew in the face of everything this country stands for. When Colin Powell was asked awhile back in a California interview if he would close Guantanamo, he replied that he would close it that afternoon if he could. Many leaders in the US and around the world feel the same. Thankfully, Barack Obama is one of them.
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
23 Jan 09
Irisheyes,
First and foremost in this discussion is the underlying fact that you or no one else can see but is so obvious that if it were a snake it would have already bitten you! That fact is that you or I or most people in the world don't have a clue as to why these people were taken to Gitmo other than the ones that committed terrorist crimes in the US. You don't have the same information that Bush and his administration had and you or I don't have the info that president Obama has either. If there was no threat from the majority of these prisoners, Obama himself would not have put the 1 year timeline on it, he would have freed them today! Personally, I don't believe he will colse Gitmo because if he only brings the terrorists back to the US it will put many Americans at risk.
1 person likes this
@irisheyes (4370)
• United States
23 Jan 09
He will only bring the ones back to the US who have enough evidence against them to bring to trial. Look, we are the United States of America and we do not detain ANYONE without charges and without recourse. We do not break the Geneva accords that we signed. Whatever they did and whatever Bush knew and Obama knows, they get due process because that is the way we do it. We do not sneak onto foreign soil so we can violate human & legal rights and claim it is okay because it was done outside the USA. I have no problem with executing anyone in Gitmo who can be proven guilty of terrorism against the US BUT I have a big problem with incarcerating them without charges and trying them without due process or representation. It is not necessary for any of us to know what Bush knew or what Obama knows. We know what our country stands for and it is not what went down at Gitmo.


