Obama calls $18 Billion in Wall Street Bonuses "Shamefull"...
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
January 29, 2009 6:28pm CST
Prs. Obama, if $18 Billion is "shamefull" then how on earth do you justify the $819 billion Pelosi and her partners in crime just voted to give yours and their buddies?
The list of "Yea" votes is a roll call of corruption in the US House of Representatives. That wasn't a "stimulus" package that was a "stimulant" package. Our government (Legislative and Executive branches) is filled with a bunch of junkies. Junkies Jonesing for pork for themselves and their friends.
They lie through their teeth calling it a "jobs" program, but there isn't a single real job to be found in it. Sorry to break it to the dollar druggies, but changing the lawn on federal grounds isn't a real job.
Now the US Senate has their spoon hovering over the candle, looking forward to their fix.
What our government is doing is just as destructive as a heroine addiction, and there isn't a clean needle to be found.
Shameful Obama, Take a look at the track marks on your own arm.
2 people like this
5 responses
@xfahctor (14113)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
30 Jan 09
18 Billion in bonuses is "shamefull". $819 in pork, government takeovers and trojan horses is an outrageous act of iresponsable, disgracefull, totalitarian coup. I read through the bill, a few times actualy and the more I read, the more frightened I became aas the slow realization of what this really was. People, all party bickering aside, you need to call your senators and SCREAM at them, yell, curse, demand retraction, threaten them with civil unrest if you have to. This is not just a subtle shift in the feel of governent, it is a klurch towrds something never seen in this country, a government our founder would call an abomination and an insult to every drop of blood they shed in giving us this great land. This goes beyond party lines. Please, I implore you, forget that little letter in front of your name on a voter registration and step back a moment, realize what this truly is and rage against it.
4 people like this
@Taskr36 (13963)
• United States
30 Jan 09
Wow, I had a response all ready, but you pretty much covered the whole thing. I'll be calling my senators you can be sure. I have no doubt Mel Martinez will be with me on this one. I think Bill Nelson will be screening his calls though after the words I had for him regarding Geithner. Mind you, I didn't use any foul language, but I gave him hell over towing the party line and choosing expedience over qualifications.
His excuse, or one of his excuses, for confirming Geithner was that we need someone to get in there and start doing the job now. That's like saying I need heart surgery now! I can't wait a week for some qualified doctor, just get me the kid who flunked medical school. If he can start now, that's good enough for me!
Actually, here's his exact quote:
"Given what's at stake with our economy, it is vital that we have a Treasury Secretary who is ready to act now."
3 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Jan 09
Isn't it interesting that Obama calls $18 billion "shamefull", but there are pork projects in that stimulant bill that give the buddies of Obama, Pelosi and Reid far more than $18 billion each.
Apparently, when given the chance, Wall Street CEOs are amatures compared to our new Congress.
2 people like this
@xParanoiax (6987)
• United States
30 Jan 09
Yeah, you've hit right on it, Para. I really admire your straight-to-the-point-screw-how-it-sounds demeanor sometimes.
'Cause in situations like these, there really aren't any softer ways of putting it.
I know it's early yet...but stuff like this does not give some of us alot of reason to "hope" that things will "change" in the way he implied.
Things are changing more and more quickly by the day, alright. But mostly not in good ways...and alot of it, he doesn't have much to do with.
*frustrated sigh*
3 people like this
@Modestah (11177)
• United States
30 Jan 09
the hypocrisy is mind boggeling. but what can we do, really?
I think it is all orchestrated beyond the people whom we see and they are puppets on a string, only the people are not the puppeteers.
I do not think this has been a democracy for a long time, and the errors of russia are spread far and wide.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Jan 09
Call your Reps and Senators about it. Better yet, the next time they are home, go talk to them. Oragize a protest outside their offices, or even their homes. Most importantly, vote the rascals OUT!
1 person likes this
@morethanamolehill (1586)
• United States
30 Jan 09
Obama's statement only illustrates how little he knows about business. Or how much he knows counts on the fact that his 'Bots know nothing about business. He lumps all of the bonuses together so that it sounds like a much bigger number but the bonus a person recieves is between the recipient and the shareholders. It has nothing to do with customers. And it especially has nothing to do with government.
Obama wouldn't know shameful if came up and bit him in the a$$. The real shame is the fact the the electorate in this country was stupid enough to elect this man.
His plan is not an "economic" Stimulus It is a DemocRAT Party Stimulus.
We always get the government we deserve. Don't bother with calling your so called "representatives". They couldn't care less about you. Call the RNC and tell them that their days are over if they keep on this path. That's what I did after Gietner was approved.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Jan 09
That's why I call it the "Stimulant" package.. it's just a bunch of junkies jonesing for their fix.
1 person likes this
@jonesy123 (3948)
• United States
30 Jan 09
The $18 Billion in bonuses is indeed very shameful. On top of that I read today that because of the short timeline many banks applied for the bailout money just to have a foot in the door. They just didn't know if they really would need it with all the gloom and doom about the banks at the time. Now apparently most of them, especially the smaller ones, don't even want it and refuse their share of the money, mostly because they don't want the government influence on their banks... That tells me that most of them, even those who already received the money, didn't need it or not that much... They took it as a precaution.
And yes, I have to agree, what's all tucked away in the stimulus packages for the 'buddies' is shameful, too. Maybe Obama is trying to veer attention away from those issues and rather point the fingers at what even he can call shameful.
At the end of the day we'll be stuck with a giant mountain of debt which somehow will need to be paid off.
3 people like this






