When will the Incompetent Press Reclaim It's Place as Government Watchdog?
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
February 2, 2009 6:09am CST
The US Founding Fathers included the Freedom of the Press in the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution for a reason. They knew that no free society could stand if the press were not free to print stories that were embarrassing to government officials.
It was one of the many steps the Founding Fathers took to remind our government officials and employees that they are just another citizen. It gave the people of the press the safeguard they need to report corruption against the corrupt as well as praise for the praise worthy.
But something happened along the way. The press decided they weren't happy with standing on the sidelines, merely following leads and reporting their findings. They started to take sides.
They protected politicians they agreed with and trashed those they didn't. The officials they supported could do no wrong, those they opposed could do nothing right. They made up lies to help their favorites, even to the point of actively participating in cover ups. Lies and deception were also useful tools against the officials they oppose. It didn't matter what the facts were, as long as the lies were accepted.
No example can ever be better than the absolute love affair the incompetent press has for Prs. Barack Obama. He can do no wrong in their eyes, even when he does things that they abhored in Prs. Bush.
Spend $5 million on a single set for one speech? Sure, why not? It doesn't matter if they trashed much more frugal acts by Bush as "extravagant". Prs. Bush was considered lazy because he logged more time away from the Oval Office than those who came before him, but Sen. Obama logging less than 180 days on duty in the Senate and that was just fine and dandy.
Now he's president and talk about a honeymoon. After speaking out against the corrupt boards of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, he names one of the members of those boards as his Chief of Staff. After campaigning against the tax breaks for the rich, he names, not one, but TWO appointees who flagrantly evaded taxes... but since their foreheads were annointed by Barack Obama's hallowed hand, and they promised to pay their back taxes.. it was ok.
Apparently Rich only means you have an R after your name.
Yes, the press did report all these situations, but always with a positive, forgiving spin to them.
They were completely exposed for the rat feces they are with the "I hope he fails" debacle. In their normal incompetent ways, they edited the quote and took it out of context to fit their unethical, dishonest and vile agenda.
Of course Rush Limbaugh and other talk radio hosts are enjoying huge ratings over the last couple of decades. They are doing the job the incompetent press is supposed to do, but refuse to do it.
It is pathetic that we have "wall to wall coverage" of major stories, yet we have to go read blogs from people living in the affected area to find out the facts.
All we get from the incompetent press is lies, fabrications, quotes taken out of context and pathetic genuflecting.
So incompetent press, when are you going to put down your pom poms and start doing your jobs?
Or is cheerleading the most we can expect from you?
2 people like this
4 responses
@rodney850 (2145)
• United States
2 Feb 09
ParaTed,
The MSM is the most culpable when it comes to who we have as president right now. The normally inquisitve and investigative media was reduced to slobbering indulgent groupies! I agree with LadyLuna when she says that the only way to return the MSM to where they should be is to make them insignificant. Rush Limbaugh may pi$$ some people off but he isn't afraid to call a dog a dog or a cow a cow. He doesn't cut any slack, even to conservatives!
2 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
2 Feb 09
Hello ParaTed,
Great post!
When will the press re-embrace responsible journalism, better known as journalistic integrity? When the free market relegates them to total obscurity -- that's when.
The alternative media is forcing the old, biased dinosaur out the door. Though, it isn't happening quickly enough for my liking. As it is the tabloids (if that's even imaginable) seem to be the most responsible of the Main Street media outlets of recent days. Thank goodness for bloggers, whose challenges to MSM reporting remain the last bastion of a journalistic search for, and rescue of the truth.
At this late stage, the chances of the journalism field reining itself back in are all but an impossibility. Journalistic academia is fully infected at this point. So, until the academicians are replaced, the pathetic 'institutes of higher learning' will keep pumping out "journalists" who have no compunction about admitting, (to the tune of the low 90 percentile) that they are biased, unapologetic liberals.
It's going to be people like the folks here at MyLot who rile the ire in the face of flagrant corruption. People like us need to keep expressing our outrage at tax-cheats being appointed to the new president's cabinet, and habitual Congressional abuse of The People's trust. Then, eventually the pendulum will shift. When it does, I suspect that it's going to be very, very unpleasant!
1 person likes this

@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
2 Feb 09
What's especially frustrating ParaTed is that most people don't have a clue that Mr. Integrity, Walter Cronkite, was deceiving the world with symantec gamesmanship! He was implicitly trusted, all the while spinning his own socio-political agenda into the alleged 'hard news'.
I remember reading a survey a few years back. The subject was a listing of the top ten most trusted Americans. Mr. Integrity was ranked among the most trusted Americans ever. How sad is that given the history that emerged after Phnom Penh, Pol Pot's killing fields and the U.S. 'boots on the ground' brutally honest perspective of what really went on in Viet Nam. Shame on Walter Cronkite!
1 person likes this
@AngryKittyMSV (4317)
• United States
2 Feb 09
Speaking of Viet Nam, Hanoi Jane (treasonous) Fonda was one of king 0bama's biggest supporters. What a freaking surprise, huh?
1 person likes this
@sunil_008 (1269)
• India
3 Feb 09
everyone knows the influence of the media today. but today media is giving more emphasis to the celebrities and their lifes rather than changing the lifes that that real situation with the nation. people are more concerned about the celebrities as they see themselves and their freedom in them. so media is printing all that they want. because its a competition market if they wont then someone else will sell the story. so its the people who needs to know what exactly they want to take the media. if people are more concerned about the nation then will press can do/follw them. otherwise we all rerad the stories about who slept with whom. who had baby. who stole others gf. etc...:)
1 person likes this

@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
3 Feb 09
You make an excellent point, Sunil_008.
Although, the catch-22 is that The People won't start caring more about real life concerns until they are educated on how economics & politics affect their pocketbooks, which in-turn affects their quality of life. Generally speaking, people don't seem to make the connection between the actions of politicians and their own life-circumstances. As long as those politicians control the educational system, thereby affecting the ability of our youth to learn & employ critical thinking, then Idol, Dancing With The Stars, and the latest Hollywood gossip will dominate people's conscious concerns.
Perhaps the silver lining is that the brick-n-mortar media is going belly-up. The People are squeezing the life-blood out of those media outlets, in response to the pathetic job that they've done. As long as that trend continues, we might just have a chance to redirect our own futures.
1 person likes this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
3 Feb 09
The incompetent press has already proven that they don't care to report hard news anymore, you're right.
So they can't complain when other media moved in to fill the vacuum they abandoned.
2 people like this

@AngryKittyMSV (4317)
• United States
2 Feb 09
You said it all so well, if only there were a way to make you be HEARD! I have to keep this short becasue I am so frustrated and outraged that it is hard for me to go on for any length about this subject without spinning off into an expletive laced tirade, but I had to stop by and add my voice to what I hope will be a growing chorus that will bring truth, justice and the American way back to the people! Now I am off to the world wide web to see if I can find some bit of truth amidst the ever growing cacophony of lies and spin...
1 person likes this





