Should Mylot Pay For Questions? I think NOT
By wsamboer
@wsamboer (186)
South Africa
November 10, 2006 3:51am CST
Should Mylot restructure payments? I think they should. I think Mylot should not pay anything for short and nonsensical questions e.g. “how much you earn” or “ how you sleep” or “do you like ice-cream, I do". Or “do you like cooking, I like.” I think this kind of input-members show they are still immature or cannot form sentences. They should form part of a different group–like an under 18 group. And that those who continue in this vein should then rather forms part of this group. We cannot continue by just asking questions, especially the "shoo-shoo" we see on Mylot every day.
I don’t mean to be obnoxious or nasty, far from it, but I do think these brothers and sisters don’t know that a Blog, like Mylot, is a Journal or Diary. In a Journal or Diary you write entries of your life experiences or your feelings on certain subjects. You don’t just ask questions that have no meaning, and are many times so much nonsense, that there are no sensible answers to it. I think Mylot should not pay for these kind of input. We can learn nothing from it. Mylot should then rather pay more for sensible and factual input. That is why we are blogging. That is what it is called, Blogging on a blog. (Journal/Diary entries) Mylot’s reputation should soar upward, not crash downward.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@Asylum (47893)
• Manchester, England
10 Nov 06
I fully agree, despite the recent changes and guidelines this kind of posting still appears to be quite prolific.
It is often difficult to find a subject worthy of response, and while so many are jumping from any inane post to another and pasting "Me too" or "I dont know" in order to boost their rating, I find myself laboriously wading through pages of trash to seek out something worthwhile. Do not misunderstand me, I know there is a lot of good material here but it is buried among all the babble.
This kind of nonsense can only harm Mylot both in credibility and financially.
1 person likes this
@hodgemo2 (272)
• United States
10 Nov 06
I agree too. Plus, I'm not sure, but I don't think you get as much to respond to a post, and keep a discussion going, as you do to post 1 reponse to someone else's topic, or to create your own topic. This severly limits the amount of discussions that are actually continued. I mean, instead of getting a dialogue going, people dissect every question into as many parts as possible just to get as many topics as possible.
@amitavroy (4819)
• India
10 Nov 06
Well I think you are right.
I have seen it.
Even I submitted many important topics for discussion but I had no response.
But when I submit a stupid question
Then I get ample of replies.
What can I do now?
@jrsrinivasforu (80)
• India
10 Nov 06
hey .. i dont understand why all of u r making so much about this MYLOT..!






