The Blatant Bigotry of Class Warfare.
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
March 3, 2009 6:09pm CST
"Can you judge a man,
By the way he wears his hair?
Can you read his mind,
By the clothes that he wears?
Can you see a bad man,
By the pattern on his tie?"
Well then, Mr, you're a better man than I"
At the heart of class warfare is the lie that the more you make, the more you can afford to pay in taxes. Like all other forms of bigotry, this lie is based on the assumption that the bigot can judge others based on mindless preconceived notions.
Why do class warfare warriors automatically assume that "the rich" can afford to pay more in taxes just because they make more money? Why do class warfare warriors presume that they should get to decide what others can and can't afford at all?
If I make $25,000 a year, but I live on $15,000 a year, I have $10,000 in disposable income. If a "rich" person makes $250 Million a year, but his yearly expenses come to $250 Million then he has no disposable income whatsoever.
So who can afford to pay more in taxes, the one who has $10k, or the one who has none?
You see, income has nothing to do with what someone can and can't afford. Disposable income has everything to do with it.
The class warfare bigot will defend the person who makes $25,000 a year because, why should the frugal person be penalized for being frugal. The rich person who seems to burn through their money so fast should be the one held to the fire for their extravagant lifestyle.
So what they are saying is, there should be a law against living within one's means, if those means are too high.. or in other words, punish the rich, not for any crimes they commit, but simply because they are rich...
This attitude makes them absolutely no different than the person who would punish Black people simply because they are Black. Jews simply because of their heritage or any other bigotry.
"Can you judge a man,
By the way he wears his hair?
Can you read his mind,
By the clothes that he wears?
Can you see a bad man,
By the pattern on his tie?
Well then, Mr, you're a better man than I"
It's ironic isn't it. The song protests the bigotry of judging people based on the clothes they wear or the pattern on his tie, yet the class warfare warrior will insist that we should not only judge people based on such things, but tax them accordingly.
Blatant Bigotry.
3 responses
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Mar 09
Hang on a second there cowboy. Who's responsible for the amount of disposable income anyone has after "expenses"? I believe that's an individual responsibility. There are those who earn $25k per year and are living paycheck to paycheck with not a dime of disposable income. Then there are the folks like my brother-in-law with his company that earned over $5 million last year. Who's responsibility is it that his house is five times larger than ours, that he buys a new Hummer every year and his wife a new Jag? That they own and maintain a huge yacht? So, if my husband and I have more disposable income than he does because we live a different lifestyle he should catch a break taxwise and we shouldn't? No one forces a rich man to live the "lifestyle" but economics does force a poor man to live in an entirely different one.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
4 Mar 09
True, there are people making $25k a year with absolutely no disposable income, but there are people making 100 times that with no disposable income too.
Why do you call for fining the person who makes $250 Million simply because of your preconceived notions about what they can and can't afford?
The fact is, it is nothing but bigotry to demand more from either.
Economics doesn't force anything from anyone. Some have more money than others, that isn't force, that is just a fact of life.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
4 Mar 09
See what I mean. You can't make arguments based on class without prejudging people.
@spalladino (17891)
• United States
4 Mar 09
You don't agree with the tax increase for those earning $250k and more...I get that. Would you agree with a tax increase across the board even though those in the lower income brackets end up paying no taxes? Kinda futile isn't it?
True, there are people making $25k a year with absolutely no disposable income, but there are people making 100 times that with no disposable income too.
I actually find that very difficult to believe.
Why do you call for fining the person who makes $250 Million simply because of your preconceived notions about what they can and can't afford?
I don't "call" for anything, Ted. Common sense dictates that raising taxes on those who don't pay taxes is a wasted effort.
Economics doesn't force anything from anyone. Some have more money than others, that isn't force, that is just a fact of life.
Economics most certainly does force things on those who have little. They're forced to scrimp in order to get by, they're forced to live in certain economic areas, they're forced do without, they're forced to have to choose between paying a bill and buying food or medicine. The rich aren't forced to live a particular lifestyle, however, the poor are...because of economics.

@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
4 Mar 09
The socialists running things do think. They are doing a great job of destroying capitalism, which is exactly what they want to do.
1 person likes this

@venchaul (541)
• China
4 Mar 09
That's a good song! I aree with you! Different class should be burden relevant responsibilities!




