i am against the referral rule in cricket.

Tweet

hi friends.first things first .i am against the newly testing referral system. my feeling is that it would take out the human effect from cricket.take a look back to cricket before 1992.the umpire's decision is final even if he is given out wrongly.1992,run out referring came into act and the results are terrible.i am not saying that run out decisions are wrongly made.i am saying that the umpires are becoming complacent because of technology. so tell me.when was the last time u have seen an umpire give a run out without referring the third umpire?even for cases where batsmen are 1 meter outside/inside the crease,the ground umpire goes to the 3rd umpire that pathetic . even more pathetic was the new referral system is making the already slow moving test cricket even slower.a batsmen even after knowing that he is out ask for referral because he got 2 more referring to waste and it takes 6 minutes out of the game. so whats the role of the umpire now anyways? wides,noball,byes,leg byes,over.at present no one cares about byes and leg byes and wides are too obvious so that makes the umpire role as nothing more than a consultant who sends information to the third umpire to the fielders. i got a lot more but basically ,this is why i am against the referral system.