The Tudors

Jonathan Meyers as King henry the 8th in the tudor - The Tudors
@loudcry (1043)
India
April 11, 2009 1:10pm CST
Television and cinemas draw a lot of flak for being a means of wasting time. But, I for one beleive in the great power of this medium. Case in point is a series being aired on Fox history. The Tudors. A docudrama(new concept ah?) on the Tudor dynasty. It was created in 2007 by Micheal Hirst. The first season is currently being aired in India . Right now the life of King Henry the 8th is being chronicled. He is yet to take on the Roman Catholic church and has just married once so far! So plenty of action still left. Jonathan Rhys Meyers plays( you will remember him as the taciturn coach from 'Bend it like bechkam') King Henry. This series has has its share of controversies too. It has been accused of presenting history inaccurately. That is probably why it is called a 'docudrama'. It is also accused of having many raunchy scenes(which our censor board would have taken care of). Other are worried about the 'americanisation' of British History. Nevertheless, it is a good series to catch. Just cross check with wiki for facts!
3 responses
@jlamela (4898)
• Philippines
10 Aug 09
Actually I am into researching now with British monarchy because I want to write a book about the monarchy. One of the most controversial royal houses both in English and British history is Tudor, not because of its notorious member HENRY VIII but because of the Tudor royal house name existing alone. The founder of this line-King Henry VII-was a descendant of the Lancasters, the family that fought hard with York at the War of Roses because of the dispute on English throne succession. King Henry VII united the two warring houses by marrying Edward IV's daughter Princess Elizabeth of York, earning him the title "Solomon King of England". I read many things about this royal house and seen number of movies too but I want to study more about their lives. Despite all the scandals, rudeness, arrogance and cruelty that happened in the royal court of Henry VIII, it was in this house that England achieved its glorious existence through Henry's daughter the great Elizabeth and as a result of her stubborn attitude towards marriage paved the way for the creation of Great Britain and its prestige.
@loudcry (1043)
• India
10 Aug 09
Its great to know you are writing a book, its on my 'to do' list too. Do let us mylotters know about the progress of the book.
1 person likes this
@harshadod (858)
• India
14 Apr 09
Thanks again for throwing light on History, especially a new interest. I did go through the medieval history of the royal family and its various nuances. How religion and politics had a marriage of convenience. The selfish genes compelling the royal families to keep everything in the family. How the dynasties began and ended , Henry VII to Elizabeth and both beginning and end were characteristically had transferring of royalty to the kith and kin... History is rewritten by the powerful and the real history is always a mystery. People criticizing the TUdors tv series have the main grouse that fact is more interesting than fiction. The facts would have entailed more raunchy scenes than fiction.
@loudcry (1043)
• India
16 Apr 09
The Tudors are definitely an interesting lot. Thanks for the response.
1 person likes this
• United States
3 Oct 09
I think the most interesting thing about historical films/TV series is the choices they make in what they are going to represent/exclude. For example, in films about Alexander the Great, his sexuality is usually glossed over or not discussed at all (except for his wives, which actually played a relatively minor role in his life.) It seems to me that what gets included in a historical film tells us more about ourselves and our values than it does about the period it is supposed to be "accurately" depicting.
@loudcry (1043)
• India
3 Oct 09
We tend to treat history like art. Letting our prejudices and opinions manifest themselves. However, history demands objectivity, and any abberations in the depiction of history should be opposed. As far as 'The Tudors' is concerned I reckon commercialism has played a role in the tweeking of facts.